Re: F42 Change Proposal: Fedora Plasma Workstation (System-Wide)

Den ons 3 apr. 2024 kl 23:27 skrev Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>: > Andreas Tunek wrote: > > From Red Hat's POV it is not Fedora Gnome Workstation ( > > > https://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2020/05/07/gnome-is-not-the-default-for-fedora-workstation/

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Fedora Plasma Workstation (System-Wide)

Den ons 3 apr. 2024 kl 18:45 skrev Neal Gompa : > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 12:22 PM Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 2 2024 at 06:18:31 PM -07:00:00, Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > I mean, we really don't need to speculate about this much. We did an > > > entire overhaul

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Pytorch Release (Self-Contained)

Den fre 12 jan. 2024 kl 05:40 skrev drago01 : > > > On Thursday, January 11, 2024, Aoife Moloney wrote: > >> >> == Benefit to Fedora == >> >> This change will introduce PyTorch, a high demand machine learning >> framework, to Fedora. PyTorch is widely used for tasks such as image >> and speech

Re: CentOS Stream, RHEL, and Fedora [was Re: What is Fedora?]

Den tis 11 juli 2023 kl 19:12 skrev Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>: > Since RHEL is made out from Centos Stream and Centos Stream is made out > from Fedora ELN, can't Alma and Rocky branch directly from Fedora? > Can we collaborate in some way with those communities so

Re: CentOS Stream, RHEL, and Fedora [was Re: What is Fedora?]

Den tis 11 juli 2023 kl 12:49 skrev Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>: > Oracle has (finally – the community projects Rocky and Alma were much > quicker to react) made an announcement about the situation: > >

Re: Advice needed: Pantheon desktop broken on Fedora 37 (yes, worse than usual)

Den tors 13 okt. 2022 kl 17:01 skrev Neal Gompa : > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 10:58 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 10:55 AM Michael J Gruber > wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for all your work! > > > > > > Dropping pantheon is not the only fallout of GNOME's schedule around > our

Re: PackageKit Password Prompt on Fedora 36

I also get the prompts, they seem to be related to when there are multiple users logged in on the same system. Best regards Andreas Den sön 17 apr. 2022 kl 06:05 skrev Otto Urpelainen : > Mark Bidewell kirjoitti 16.4.2022 klo 16.23: > > I hope this is the right mailing list since this is about

Re: ELN SIG Launch

Den lör 13 feb. 2021 kl 02:10 skrev Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>: > Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > And why would I want to do Red Hat's / IBM's work for free? > > > > Contributing to Fedora provides value to me because I use Fedora myself. > > In contrast, what would

Re: Am I the only one affected by Bug 1903332?

Den tors 3 dec. 2020 kl 20:49 skrev Peter Robinson : > > My computer does not boot with later Linux (like > kernel-5.9.10-200.fc33.x86_64 and 5.9.11-200.fc33) and I reported that in > Bug 1903332. I guess that is a really HW-specific bug since it hasn't been > discussed here, but I wonder if

Am I the only one affected by Bug 1903332?

My computer does not boot with later Linux (like kernel-5.9.10-200.fc33.x86_64 and 5.9.11-200.fc33) and I reported that in Bug 1903332. I guess that is a really HW-specific bug since it hasn't been discussed here, but I wonder if anyone else here has the same problem? I guess I will enable

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Route all Audio to PipeWire (System-Wide Change)

Den lör 21 nov. 2020 kl 15:31 skrev James Szinger : > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:35:19 -0600 > Brandon Nielsen wrote: > > If it has changed, it would be really great if pipewire-pulse could > > make it into the F33 repos so it could be easily tested. > > I agree. I think new software should be

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Branched 20200906.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Den sön 6 sep. 2020 kl 14:59 skrev : > Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event > for Fedora 33 Branched 20200906.n.0. Please help run some tests for this > nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly > release validation testing, see: >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

Den mån 31 aug. 2020 kl 22:40 skrev Michael Catanzaro : > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:19 pm, Andreas Tunek > wrote: > > I can't get that command to do anything useful in either F32 or F33. > > You should see something like: > > $ resolvectl query example.com > examp

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

Den mån 31 aug. 2020 kl 00:55 skrev Michael Catanzaro : > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:30 pm, Andreas Tunek > wrote: > > On my F33 test system (new install yesterday) I can see my NAS but I > > can't connect to it. Could that be due to this change? > > Possibly! Try

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On my F33 test system (new install yesterday) I can see my NAS but I can't connect to it. Could that be due to this change? Best regards Andreas ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora 33, can't access NAS

I made a fresh install with Fedora Workstation 33 today and everything seems to be working except for one problem. I can see my NAS in Files, but I can't connect to it. It looks exactly the same as F32 where everything works as expected. Does anyone have any pointers on how to debug this, or

Re: Slow boot on F32 Workstation

Den tors 26 mars 2020 kl 05:56 skrev Przemek Klosowski via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>: > On 3/21/20 8:45 AM, Andreas Tunek wrote: > > I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from > > the start I noticed that booting F32 was r

Re: Slow boot on F32 Workstation

Den mån 23 mars 2020 kl 06:23 skrev Chris Murphy : > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:46 AM Andreas Tunek > wrote: > > > > I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from > the start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was > some k

Re: Slow boot on F32 Workstation

Den sön 22 mars 2020 kl 03:26 skrev Tony Nelson < tonynel...@georgeanelson.com>: > On 20-03-21 08:45:09, Andreas Tunek wrote: > > I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from > > the > > start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow.

Re: Slow boot on F32 Workstation

Den lör 21 mars 2020 kl 15:24 skrev Stephen John Smoogen : > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:46 Andreas Tunek > wrote: > >> I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the >> start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was

Slow boot on F32 Workstation

I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was some kind of bug or some devel stuff and would get solved. However, I still have the problem and I wonder if this a problem unique to my hardware or a

Re: Downgrading from rawhide

Den tis 25 feb. 2020 kl 16:10 skrev Christophe de Dinechin < dinec...@redhat.com>: > Is there any documented procedure to safely downgrade from rawhide to > the latest release? > > I tried > > # dnf update --releasever=32 fedora-release > # dnf distro-sync --allowerasing --skip-broken > > Does

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal (late): Enable EarlyOOM

Den lör 4 jan. 2020 kl 01:53 skrev John M. Harris Jr : > On Friday, January 3, 2020 4:25:20 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > in the cases were I could issue syrq+b, responsiveness was so bad > > it'd take upwards of 15 minutes just to type out the command > > In that case, I'd suggest waiting the

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Drop Optical Media Release Criterion

Den mån 16 dec. 2019 kl 18:42 skrev Adam Williamson < adamw...@fedoraproject.org>: > > > Sometimes someone will propose that we've crossed the line when we > haven't, and usually we realize this and the proposal fails (excellent > example: the recentish "x86-64 micro-architecture update"

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

Den tis 10 dec. 2019 kl 15:36 skrev John M. Harris Jr : > Most users, just like most American and UK users, set their keyboard > layout to their > primary layout, and then don't change it, unless it's to try out Dvorak, > Colemak, or another alternative keyboard layout for a bit, at which point >

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, 02:11 John M. Harris Jr, wrote: > > > The user experience is nothing like data loss. The users are not stupid. > It's > fine that the keyboard layout for initramfs is only updated when initramfs > is > rebuilt. People don't change their primary keyboard layout very often. I >

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change: glusterfs dropping 32-bit arches

On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, 23:33 Kevin Kofler, wrote: > Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Building it on 32-bit in the CI is only to ensure correctness of sprintf > > format strings. It's a compile-only test. > > And that is sufficient. As long as it compiles, you can package it. > Whether > upstream

Re: systemd-243-rc1

On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, 16:10 Nicolas Mailhot via devel, < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Le 2019-07-31 14:13, Lennart Poettering a écrit : > > Hi Lennart > > > Note that there's a "stable" backport tree maintained outside of the > > main repo: > > > >

Re: Better fonts by default?

On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 at 03:53, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: > > Unfortunately, a lot of text on the web renders really poorly without > > rgba subpixel rendering (aka ClearType). It's a lot less noticeable if > > you're lucky enough to have a 4K display (which I do not). > > I have a

Re: IBM buying RedHat

On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, 22:22 Chris Murphy, wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Antonio Trande > wrote: > > "IBM to acquire Red Hat in deal valued at $34 billion" > > > > > https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/28/ibm-is-reportedly-nearing-deal-to-acquire-red-hat.html > > > Official press release. >

Re: F29 hidden GRUB, problem testing and how to unhide

ub command line, which is the > only thing that has that command line, is passed onto the kernel and I > can see that in dmesg - which would not be the case with direct kernel > boot, if grub were being skipped. > > > -- I could only get the GRUB menu by using F

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

Den mån 3 sep. 2018 kl 12:56 skrev Fabio Valentini : > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, 09:13 Ron Yorston wrote: >> >> Adam Williamson wrote: >> >On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 08:58 -0700, stan wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 09:33:39 +0200 >> >> Andreas T

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

Den mån 3 sep. 2018 kl 14:07 skrev Hans de Goede : > > Hi, > > On 02-09-18 09:33, Andreas Tunek wrote: > > Den lör 1 sep. 2018 kl 15:50 skrev stan : > >> > >> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 13:44:56 +0200 > >> Andreas Tunek wrote: > >> > >>

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

Den sön 2 sep. 2018 kl 17:59 skrev stan : > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 09:33:39 +0200 > Andreas Tunek wrote: > > > There is no root acoount on a default F29 installation. Also, you > > can't see the boot menu and I haven't been able to trigger it. > > Whoa! I'm not sure w

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

Den sön 2 sep. 2018 kl 18:18 skrev Adam Williamson : > > On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 08:58 -0700, stan wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 09:33:39 +0200 > > Andreas Tunek wrote: > > > > > There is no root acoount on a default F29 installation. Also, you > > > can't

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

Den lör 1 sep. 2018 kl 15:50 skrev stan : > > On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 13:44:56 +0200 > Andreas Tunek wrote: > > > I can't get a commandline, everything seems stuck in the boot > > process Is there anyway to get a commandline and update the system > > when it is in

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

Den lör 1 sep. 2018 kl 09:54 skrev Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek : > > On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 09:21:42AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 07:06:09AM -, Raphael Groner wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > tried the suggested workaround with systemctl enable dbus-daemon. Now I > >

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

Den tors 30 aug. 2018 kl 15:21 skrev Hans de Goede : > > Hi All, > > Just a quick headsup for users following Fedora 29, the > dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 build is missing the systemd dbus.service > file, breaking almost everything. > > Instead it contains a dbus-daemon.service file, but the > dbus.socket

Re: F28 System Wide Change: AArch64 Server Promotion

ect.org/ > wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi#Raspberry_Pi_3_aarch64_support not > accurate when it says it *is* supported? > That link does not work for me and I get some strange redirect to the Fedora download page. /Andreas Tunek > Jonathan > ___

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

2017-07-14 19:05 GMT+02:00 Debarshi Ray : > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: >> > F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of >> > their applications

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Reduce Initial Setup Redundancy

2017-07-11 20:33 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org>: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:10:30PM +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> > I think that's fine. The GUI doesn't need to cover every possible use >> > case, and this particular use case does not seem to be

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Reduce Initial Setup Redundancy

2017-07-11 19:50 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org>: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 07:18:39PM +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> What I wanted to do in the GUI is to revert to the Fedora setup with >> one root and several "regular" users. That

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Reduce Initial Setup Redundancy

2017-07-11 16:25 GMT+02:00 Michael Catanzaro <mike.catanz...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Andreas Tunek <andreas.tu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> So you mean that bug 1270953 >> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270953) is >

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Reduce Initial Setup Redundancy

2017-07-10 21:37 GMT+02:00 Michael Catanzaro <mike.catanz...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Andreas Tunek <andreas.tu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Will there be any GUI method to remove the sudo rights from the first >> created user? > &

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Reduce Initial Setup Redundancy

2017-07-07 16:24 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Reznik : > = System Wide Change: Reduce Initial Setup Redundancy = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReduceInitialSetupRedundancy > > Change owner(s): > * Michael Catanzaro > > Currently there is a high level of

Re: F26 System Wide Change: GNOME 3.24

2017-01-31 20:24 GMT+01:00 Matthew Miller : > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 02:53:13PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> == Detailed Description == >> Tentative new features for 3.24 include: >> >> * Updated System Settings panels: User Accounts, Printer, Online Accounts >> * Tag

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-25 17:37 GMT+01:00 Stephen John Smoogen : > On 25 November 2016 at 09:27, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> >> >> - Original Message - >>> On 2016-11-17 07:43 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> > 2. The Fedora QA group has 1 mac mini which is very old

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-18 15:53 GMT+01:00 Stephen John Smoogen : > On 18 November 2016 at 02:39, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> > Apples and oranges. There's no installer on ARM. There's no need to wipe >>> > all your data on a desktop system that you have one unit of.

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-18 19:37 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy : > Options: > 1. Keep the mactel-boot stuff (pretty but weird), and write up test > cases specifically to account for the weirdness in particular how to > reset the state of the computer so it's possible to do clean installs. >

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.3 Available Now!

2016-11-16 15:17 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tunek <andreas.tu...@gmail.com>: > 2016-11-16 1:00 GMT+01:00 <rawh...@fedoraproject.org>: >> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.3 is now >> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation >&

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.3 Available Now!

2016-11-16 1:00 GMT+01:00 : > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.3 is now > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation > testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: >

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-15 17:30 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>: > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> 2016-11-15 8:43 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>: >> > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 07:35 +0100, Andreas Tu

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-15 17:31 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>: > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 17:27 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> Maybe the release criteria should reflect that then. Right now it says >> that mac support is a criteria for release. > > You do rememb

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-15 17:12 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org>: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Andreas Tunek <andreas.tu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> 2016-11-15 15:35 GMT+01:00 Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com>: >>> On 15 November 2016 at 01:35,

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-15 8:43 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>: > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 07:35 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> If something is in the release criteria I expect the feature to be >> present in the release. If the feature in question has worked for ~

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-15 13:45 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org>: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Andreas Tunek <andreas.tu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> 2016-11-14 22:26 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org>: >>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:13 PM,

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-15 15:35 GMT+01:00 Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com>: > On 15 November 2016 at 01:35, Andreas Tunek <andreas.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2016-11-15 1:06 GMT+01:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl>: > >>> You seem to confuse

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-15 1:06 GMT+01:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl>: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:52:15PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> AFAIK, you have been able to install Fedora on Intel Macs since 2008 >> (that was when I first tried). To not be able to install Fedo

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-14 22:57 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>: > On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 22:13 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> It not only means >> that the work people did developing and testing the features where >> wasted > > The change in question clear

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-14 22:26 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org>: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Andreas Tunek <andreas.tu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> 2016-11-14 14:01 GMT+01:00 Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com>: >>> On 11/13/2016 01:46 PM, Ms Sanch

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-14 14:01 GMT+01:00 Stephen Gallagher : > On 11/13/2016 01:46 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote: >> >> >> On 11/11/16 14:33, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> >>> Just to address this specifically, I am referring to Apple's penchant for >>> stuffing their machines with hardware from

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-11 10:04 GMT+01:00 Fabio Alessandro Locati <f...@redhat.com>: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 09:20:08AM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> As a mac owner (although one that is not very well supported by >> Linux*) I really appreciate the fact that Fedora works. And sayi

Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

2016-11-11 4:09 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson : > On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 21:44 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Adam Williamson >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 13:31 -0800, Chris Murphy wrote: >> > >

Re: On running gui applications as root

2015-11-18 21:24 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson : > On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 15:09 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: >> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:53 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> >> > I don't understand. If a user who has the right to act as root asks >> > to authorize a program

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

2015-10-19 20:47 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net>: > > > Am 19.10.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Gerard Ryan: >> >> On 10/18/2015 06:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: >>> >>> I still can't upgrade, I get: >>> >>> dnf system-upgrad

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

2015-10-02 21:20 GMT+02:00 Gerard Ryan <gali...@fedoraproject.org>: > On 10/02/2015 07:11 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> 2015-09-26 0:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Daede <bztdli...@gmail.com>: >>> On 09/25/2015 02:18 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: >>> >>>>

Re: Better irc policies?

2015-10-15 14:27 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller : > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:15:50AM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: >> >Is there a plan for dealing with IRC nicks and the Hubs chat? >> >> There's an IRC nick field in FAS. My thoughts were by default for >> new users we'll

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

2015-09-26 0:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Daede <bztdli...@gmail.com>: > On 09/25/2015 02:18 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: > >> Removed librtmp (what could go wrong?), now I get the following error: >> >> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux dnf[621]: Error: package >> kernel-core-4.

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

2015-09-23 20:39 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl>: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 07:47:58PM +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> 2015-09-23 0:16 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>: >> > On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 13:33 -0400, Matthew Mill

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

2015-09-25 23:11 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tunek <andreas.tu...@gmail.com>: > 2015-09-23 20:39 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl>: >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 07:47:58PM +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote: >>> 2015-09-23 0:16 GMT+02:00 Adam Williams

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 23 Beta!

2015-09-23 0:16 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson : > On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 13:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 06:21:00PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> > I just used dnf distro-sync as per: >> >

Help me bisect boot problem.

Hi My main computer is affected by bugs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236423 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240566. The correct way to solve this bug would be for me to bisect from 4.0.4-303.fc22 to see which patch broke on my system. Unfortunately I have not

Re: Better irc policies?

2015-06-10 20:11 GMT+02:00 Gerald B. Cox gb...@bzb.us: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Chaoyi Zha cydrob...@fedoraproject.org wrote: certainly increases the barrier to something newbies or those trying out may not be willing to commit. Here are the instructions on how to register your

Re: Better irc policies?

2015-06-10 21:51 GMT+02:00 Gerald B. Cox gb...@bzb.us: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com wrote: This is the actual instruction for registering taken from here: https://freenode.net/faq.shtml#nicksetup Same instructions my link is a paragraph

Better irc policies?

Currently the #fedora channel on freenode requires some kind of registration. In my opinion it is pretty difficult to register on freenode (I have tried but haven't managed). Do you think it would be possible to drop the registration requirement? It is a pretty big barrier to newbies and people

Re: Making 3rd party gstreamer codecs work in F22

2015-04-25 18:43 GMT+02:00 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com: Hi, It turns out that some of the 3rd party repos that ship additional gstreamer codecs have been lagging behind and aren't ready for F22. At this point it's unclear if they'll manage to put out any recompiled F22 packages in

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Branched 20150217 nightly compose nominated for testing

2015-02-17 14:11 GMT+01:00 adamw...@fedoraproject.org: Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 22 Branched 20150217. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see:

Re: GStreamer (?) sound problems on 21

2015-01-31 20:14 GMT+01:00 Matěj Cepl mc...@cepl.eu: On 2015-01-31, 16:29 GMT, you wrote: I think *probably* ALSA. IIRC, PulseAudio should resample streams to a rate the card can play, but it gets the information as to what streams the card can play from ALSA, I think. 'pulseaudio -k;

Re: GStreamer (?) sound problems on 21

Added bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188398 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

GStreamer (?) sound problems on 21

Hi everyone This is a bug but I am unsure how to report it. Anyway the problem is that I do not get any sound from Rhythmbox and Totem. I get sound from Gnome shell, the gnome terminal, mplayer and the speaker test in Gnome. As far as I know Rhythmbox, Totem and Gnome use Gstreamer, so it should

Re: GStreamer (?) sound problems on 21

2015-01-31 14:34 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com: Hi everyone This is a bug but I am unsure how to report it. Anyway the problem is that I do not get any sound from Rhythmbox and Totem. I get sound from Gnome shell, the gnome terminal, mplayer and the speaker test in Gnome

F21 install experience on iMac (5K retina)

Hi Fedora I just wanted to give my impressions on the F21 install experience on an iMac (but I guess it is applicable for any mac). I installed F21 workstation on an Retina iMac after I made half the SSD free space. The installer set up all partitions and I went with the default. Everything

Re: F21 install experience on iMac (5K retina)

2015-01-26 22:18 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com: On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-01-26 21:32 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com: On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com wrote

Re: F21 install experience on iMac (5K retina)

2015-01-26 21:32 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com: On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com wrote: Problems Linux can't find the correct resolution of the screen, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184204 Not sure about

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

I just want to say that I really support this feature. I do not see any point in a firewall for a Workstation. BTW, while we are on the subject, does anyone know how to actually disable the firewall in Fedora 20? I haven't managed to figure it out /Andreas -- devel mailing list

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-15 20:08 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net: Am 15.04.2014 20:03, schrieb Andreas Tunek: I just want to say that I really support this feature. I do not see any point in a firewall for a Workstation. that's obviously BTW, while we are on the subject, does anyone know

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

2014-04-15 21:28 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net: Am 15.04.2014 20:18, schrieb Andreas Tunek: 2014-04-15 20:08 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net: Am 15.04.2014 20:03, schrieb Andreas Tunek: I just want to say that I really support this feature. I do not see any

Empathy takes over Polari

Hi list Everytime I try to start Polari Empathy's IRC client takes over (and shuts down Polari). Is this a reported bug, and if so, in which package (Polari or empathy)? /Andreas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

? /Andreas Tunek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

2014-01-28 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org I'm not sure I'm convinced. If someone is on the command line, isn't it easiest to use a command-line tool to install those kinds of things? If you want to install a c++ compiler you would have to know the exact package name of that

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

2014-01-28 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com That's not the tool we've designed and built. We've built a GUI application installer, not a package installer. That is awesome! Thank you! But in a lot of cases it is very nice to have a GUI package installer. /Andreas -- devel mailing list

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

cursors, or the theme. Why switch to a different tool ( ie, a software installer ) to install something that is not a software ? So every application that could be extended would have to be rewritten? How would you solve stuff like extra gvfs-components? Have that support in nautilus? /Andreas Tunek

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

2014-01-27 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org: Le lundi 27 janvier 2014 à 17:11 +0100, Andreas Tunek a écrit : 2014-01-26 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org: Le dimanche 26 janvier 2014 à 18:14 +0100, Heiko Adams a écrit : Am Sonntag, den 26.01.2014, 12:01 -0500 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: Hi

Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.

On 19/08/2013 4:31 PM, Richard Vickery richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:28:34PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote: Basically we ship Fedora 20 in a state where one only of our major desktop

apf support in default?

Hi Fedora I just installed F19 on this computer and most stuff worked great. However, when I tried to access my NAS using afp ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Filing_Protocol) it didn't work. In F17 everything worked without any problems. Anyway, a little digging later I realized that the

Re: Heads up: LLVM 3.3 and Mesa 9.2-pre

Will this mean that newish radeon UVD (video decoder acceleration stuff) will be available (or at least easier) for F19? Best regards Andreas 2013/5/6 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com LLVM 3.3 is coming soon, and is required [1] for some upcoming Mesa features including newer Radeon support and

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Test Compose 6 (TC6) Available Now!

Maybe your hitting this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950653 /Andreas 2013/4/14 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com Hi On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: [snip for brevity] Live DVD boots as far as black screen after progress bars no further with no

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

2013/4/9 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com On 09/04/13 10:41 AM, Andreas Tunek wrote: I tried the live image on two computers and could not get into GDM. Is this a known bug or should I report it? It's hard to tell with no more details than that, but there are no known general

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

2013/4/9 Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org *IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3, TC4, and TC5 are over their size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE and Live SoaS). As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is now

Fedora 18 on Asus U38N-C4010H

. If you boot into Win8 and boot into Fedora 18 everything seems to work, but rebooting into F18 from F18 does not work. I do not have access to the laptop anymore so I will not be able to test anything else. But I will see if I can try F19 alpha on it. /Andreas Tunek -- devel mailing list devel

  1   2   >