On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:35:49PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> Under review, thanks for preparing ansible 2.0 landing :)
Haïkel,
I think I fixed the spec file w/r/t to your initial review comments.
Cheers,
--
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <l...@redhat.com> | larsks @ {freenode,twitter,gith
upporting modules, but that seems like a different issue.
Environments runnning Python 2 should continue to Just Work.
--
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <l...@redhat.com> | larsks @ {freenode,twitter,github}
Cloud Engineering / OpenStack | http://blog.oddbit.com/
signature.asc
Description
t Ansible target was for
supported Python versions. Bad Lars.
--
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <l...@redhat.com> | larsks @ {freenode,twitter,github}
Cloud Engineering / OpenStack | http://blog.oddbit.com/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
, there is an installable
python-shade package available via my COPR:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/larsks/python-shade/
(Caveat: rawhide required)
--
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <l...@redhat.com> | larsks @ {freenode,twitter,github}
Cloud Engineering / OpenStack | http://blog.oddb
simply doesn't
pan out. But I also think that in many situations it is not required
and using systemd inside the container simply complicates things.
--
Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com | larsks @ {freenode,twitter,github}
Cloud Engineering / OpenStack | http://blog.oddbit.com
to share work with
the larger community.
Cheers,
--
Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
the upstream build process.
--
Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:38:25PM -0400, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
A version-less library is less than ideal, however. How stable is the
API/ABI?
Yeah, that's my feeling, too, but that's what the upstream Makefile
