[EPEL-devel] Packages disappearing from the EPEL 9 buildroot

Hi! Two packages I built for EPEL 9 are now reported by koschei as having missing build dependencies. https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/davix?collection=epel9 https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/uglify-js?collection=epel9 The EPEL 9 builds were built using the following build

gsoap updated in rawhide

The gsoap package was updated in rawhide to version 2.8.117. As always for this package there is a soname bump. The following dependent packages were rebuild by me: CGSI-gSOA voms The following dependent packages need to be rebuilt. Maintainers in cc: davix dmlite gridsite srm-ifce

Non-responsive maintainer tc01 (Ben Rosser)

Hi! I filed a bugzilla request 2021-04-18 (almost 4 month ago) asking for the uglify-js package to be updated: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950780 There has been no reply from the maintainer. Following the non-responsive maintainer policy

[EPEL-devel] gnu-free-fonts-20120503-18.el8.0.1 still not tagged into dist-c8-compose

Hi. I was asked to repost a thread from the CentOS forum on this mailing list: Sorry for starting a new thread. But there has not been any activity on the old thread for a month (2020-02-05) except for my request for a status update a week ago (2020-02-26) for which there was no reply. Can

Re: epel8: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot

tor 2020-01-30 klockan 17:42 -0800 skrev Kevin Fenzi: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 07:57:22AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 06:06, Jiri Kucera wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > when doing `fedpkg scratch-build --target epel8-candidate --srpm > > >

gsoap updated in rawhide

The gsoap package was updated in rawhide to version 2.8.91. As always for this package there is a soname bump. The following dependent packages were rebuild by me: CGSI-gSOA voms The following dependent packages need to be rebuilt. Maintainers in cc: davix dmlite fts glite-lb-server

[EPEL-devel] The use of the playground

Hi! I recently had a discussion about the use of the playground on pagure.io: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8582 I was asked to bring the discussion here to epel-devel. I quote my last comment from the thread below. If you want more details you can read the entire thread at the pagure link

Re: Could not execute clone: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/mcatanzaro/Projects/fedora-scm/eog/.git/info/exclude'

ons 2019-08-07 klockan 08:30 +0200 skrev Lubomír Sedlář: > On my machine git creates the file on any clone. How did you manage to > configure it to not do so? > That being said, it's still a bug and should be fixed. You can prevent fedpkg from adding patterns to the exclude file by adding the

Re: friday roundup of failing images in rawhide

fre 2019-07-19 klockan 18:16 -0700 skrev Kevin Fenzi: > hey folks, here is a list of currently failing images in rawhide. > Please fix if you can. > > 4. Fedora scientific KDE: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36353230 > > Problems in request: > missing packages: root-python

Trying to reach maintainer Andreas Bierfert (FAS: awjb)

Hi! I have not been successful in reaching maintainer Andreas Bierfert (FAS: awjb, e-mail in FAS: andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de). Does anyone know if he is still around? Mattias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___

Re: /usr/include/GL/glext.h:467:10: fatal error: KHR/khrplatform.h: No such file or directory

The breakage is i Fedora 29. Mattias mån 2018-12-10 klockan 12:34 + skrev Sérgio Basto: > IIRC this is fixed with Mesa in rawhide > > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 09:23 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Got an e-mail from Koschei [1] with a notice that camotics package is >

Re: F29 Mass rebuild - Help needed to fix failed build

ons 2018-07-18 klockan 15:23 +0200 skrev Zoltan Kota: > Hi All, > > The Mass rebuild of pybliographer failed. See below: > > Fwd: releng's pybliographer-1.2.18-4.fc29 failed to build > > Notification time stamped 2018-07-15 03:04:40 UTC > > releng's pybliographer-1.2.18-4.fc29 failed to

Re: Packaging Question

fre 2017-10-27 klockan 11:47 -0400 skrev Steve Dickson: > > This makes sense but the reason the libnfsidmap-devel package is not > be upgraded (or installed) is because: > > dnf install /tmp/libnfsidmap-devel* > Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:48 ago on Fri 27 Oct 2017 11:19:35 AM > EDT. >

Re: ssl is not being compiled on dillo on F26

tis 2017-09-12 klockan 03:20 + skrev Globe Trotter: > Thank you very much again for helping out here: I would not have > known how to fix this. I am wondering if you think that it might be a > good idea to ask upstream to update using openssl v 1.1 (with the > patch included). If this is the

Re: ssl is not being compiled on dillo on F26

lör 2017-09-09 klockan 05:00 + skrev Globe Trotter: > Hi, > > Thank you for your detailed response. However, I tried replacing > > AC_CHECK_LIB(ssl, SSL_library_init, ssl_ok=yes, ssl_ok=no, -lcrypto) > > with > > AC_CHECK_LIB(ssl, SSL_writet, ssl_ok=yes, ssl_ok=no, -lcrypto) > > but I

Re: ssl is not being compiled on dillo on F26

In openssl 1.1 some functions were renamed to newer more consistent names. There are however preprocessor macros defined for most of them so that old code still compiles. One of the old functions that was renamed was SSL_library_init, which now is defined in /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h as # define

Re: R packages needing review

tor 2017-06-01 klockan 10:39 -0400 skrev Tom Callaway: > Background: R recently released 3.4.0, which introduced changes that > required all "compiled" R modules to be rebuilt against it. I've been > working over the last week or so to do this, and at the same time, bring > them to the latest

Re: Help needed with packaging issue, conflicting file /usr/lib/.build-id

tor 2017-06-01 klockan 09:20 +0200 skrev Christian Dersch: > Hi all, > > I have an issue with one package (wcslib) on i686 and armv7hl > architecture in rawhide, the built binary package has file conflicts > with some more packages only on that architectures, the others seem > to be fine (so it

Review swap requests

Hi! I am offering two python packages for review swapping: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448040 Review Request: python-ipyparallel - Interactive Parallel Computing with IPython https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448041 Review Request: python-metakernel - Metakernel for

gsoap updated in rawhide

Hi! The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.43 in rawhide only. Dependent packages should rebuild. However, the mass rebuild is scheduled to start this week so just leaving it to be fixed by the mass rebuild is very much OK. $ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --srpm --whatrequires

Re: Packages FTBFS with Python 3.6

ons 2016-12-28 klockan 20:25 +0100 skrev Igor Gnatenko: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Miro Hrončok > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We've recently tried to rebuild all Python packages with Python 3.6. > > However, we currently have bunch of packages that simply fail to build. >

Looking for a proven packager

Hi! I submitted a bugzilla report with a patch that implements an improvement of the hadoop package in Fedora, extending the current incomplete Fedora integration patch that only supports ix86 and x86_64 to more architectures. The maintainer is unwilling to apply it, but says that if a proven

gsoap updated in rawhide

Hi! The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.30 in rawhide only. Dependent packages should rebuild. dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --srpm --whatrequires gsoap --alldeps davix-0:0.6.3-1.fc25.src fts-0:3.3.1-5.fc24.src glite-lb-server-0:3.0.18-10.fc24.src

Re: Fwd: Broken dependencies: qpid-dispatch

mån 2016-04-18 klockan 09:41 -0400 skrev Irina Boverman: > Why I am getting these messages? > Latest version in rawhide is 0.5-3, and there are no broken > dependencies... > Regards, Irina. > - Forwarded Message - > From: build...@fedoraproject.org > To:

Re: Fedora 24 Mass Rebuild

tor 2016-02-11 klockan 20:52 -0600 skrev Yaakov Selkowitz: > On 2016-02-06 00:08, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > The Mass Rebuild has been completed, 16129 builds have been tagged > > into f24, > > there s currently 1155 failed builds that need to be addressed by > > the package > > maintainers. FTBFS

Review swaps (4 R packages)

Hi! I have 4 R package that I submitted for review. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305333 R-highlight https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334 R-inline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305335 R-Rcpp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305336 

gsoap updated in rawhide

Hi! The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.28 in rawhide. Dependent packages should rebuild. The Fedora 24 mass rebuild is scheduled to start today, which should take care of these. But if your package is listed below, check that it builds as expected. In some cases there are

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

tis 2016-01-26 klockan 10:18 + skrev Peter Robinson: > > > > So it appears this thread was probably not enough. Which keeps us with > > > > interesting state where mock by default does not install weak > > > > dependencies where Koji installs them. It causes interesting issues > > > >

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

mån 2016-01-25 klockan 18:09 +0100 skrev Marcin Juszkiewicz: > W dniu 25.01.2016 o 17:03, Vít Ondruch pisze: > > So it appears this thread was probably not enough. Which keeps us with > > interesting state where mock by default does not install weak > > dependencies where Koji installs them. It

Re: Incomplete work of fedora-review

sön 2015-11-22 klockan 22:21 +0100 skrev Christian Dersch: > Hi all, > > I can confirm the behaviour Jens reports, there are already two bugs > open @RHBZ: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275275 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279538 > > Greetings, > Christian

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree, v2

mån 2015-10-05 klockan 14:59 +0200 skrev Kalev Lember: > Hi all, > > Here's another look at F23 broken dependencies. A number of packages > have been fixed last week, but there's also a new broken dependency, > CableSwig, due to gccxml retirement. There is a replacement for gccxml available

Re: Can't build EPEL 6 package: broken dependencies, Release Enginering ???

tor 2015-10-01 klockan 13:43 -0400 skrev Irina Boverman: > See here: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11296302 > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6309/11296309/root.log > -- > DEBUG util.py:441: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum', '- > -installroot',

Re: dnf: Error: RPM package source (jpilot-1.8.2-2.fc22.src) will not installed

mån 2015-09-28 klockan 15:06 +0200 skrev Luigi Votta: > I've downloaded it with dnf, > and attempted to install with rpm. > > But it doesn't install; this is the result: > > warning: mockbuild user doesn't exists - using root user > > when using: > rpm -i jpilot-1.8.2-2.fc22.src.rpm That

gsoap updated in rawhide

Hi! The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.22 in rawhide. Dependent packages should rebuild: CGSI-gSOAP (*) davix fts glite-lbjp-common-gsoap-plugin glite-lb-server gridsite lcgdm lcgdm-dav srm-ifce voms (*) (*) These I am maintainer for and rebuilds have been done already.

Re: gcc5 C++11 ABI rebuilds and FTBFS packages

://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217224 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65956 Mattias Ellert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code

Re: Review swaps

tor 2015-01-22 klockan 10:48 -0700 skrev Jerry James: 5. gap-pkg-sonata: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185018 Please let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thank you. Hi! About two weeks ago I sent a list of review requests to this list asking for review swaps.

gsoap updated in rawhide

Hi! The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.21 in rawhide. Dependent packages should rebuild: CGSI-gSOAP (*) davix fts glite-lbjp-common-gsoap-plugin glite-lb-server gridsite lcgdm lcgdm-dav srm-ifce voms (*) (*) These I am maintainer for and rebuilds have been done already.

Review swaps

://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165354 voms-clients-java Mattias Ellert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org

Re: Enable tapping by default

tis 2014-11-18 klockan 00:16 +0200 skrev Nikos Roussos: On 11/18/2014 12:12 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:27:53PM +0300, Mustafa Muhammad wrote: Hi, I am testing Fedora 21 beta and -like all previous versions- click by tapping is off by default. Several bug reports

Re: Make buildSRPMFromSCM faster?

lör 2014-07-19 klockan 12:30 +0100 skrev Richard W.M. Jones: The first step of most Koji builds is buildSRPMFromSCM, where a .src.rpm file is built from the git repo. Currently this involves completely building a mock buildroot containing all the BuildRequires, and running `rpmbuild -bs'.

gsoap updated in rawhide

Hi! The gsoap package in rawhide has been updated to version 2.8.17. Dependent packages should rebuild. Mattias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora

Re: rawhide report: 20131221 changes - R libraries

lör 2013-12-21 klockan 19:30 -0700 skrev Orion Poplawski: On 12/21/2013 07:46 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Sat Dec 21 05:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for i386 -- [InsightToolkit]

Re: FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

tis 2013-12-10 klockan 12:18 -0500 skrev Darryl L. Pierce: Of all the packages I maintain, only one was affected by this issue. That one was easily solvable by deleting the bundled swig generated code in the sources and have the build regenerate it with a newer swig version that doesn't

Re: FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used

fre 2013-12-06 klockan 15:06 -0500 skrev Darryl L. Pierce: On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:27:05AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Michael scherer wrote: Let's rather ask the contrary, why is this so much a issue to communicate with upstream to fix things, and add patches ? The vast majority

Re: File conflict when upgrading package

sön 2013-11-17 klockan 22:12 +0100 skrev Sandro Mani: Upgrading from xflr5-6.09.05-4.fc21.x86_64 to xflr5-6.09.05-5.fc21.x86_64 however fails with Transaction check error: file /usr/share/applications/xflr5.desktop from install of xflr5-6.09.05-5.fc21.x86_64 conflicts with file from

Re: root rebuild failed after glew update

mån 2013-11-18 klockan 04:26 +0100 skrev punto...@libero.it: Il 18/11/2013 04:13, David Airlie ha scritto: Hi owners, I tried to rebuild root after glew update, but it failed due to hadoop changes, Not sure if hadoop needs a build in rawhide for the current f20 build or something

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

tor 2013-11-07 klockan 09:14 + skrev Peter Robinson: I don't see many people forcing things through, I believe that the vast majority of contributors either like the change or aren't bothered by it. Just so that my silence is not counted as approval. I disapprove. Mattias

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

mån 2013-11-04 klockan 14:58 -0500 skrev Josh Boyer: For a large number of upstream projects, they don't care at all about being in a distro. They just focus on their project and someone else integrates it into the distro. Containerized apps are just another way to do that. No, it is

Re: A dependency for a noarch package has been removed on an archictecture. How to silent broken dependency mails?

ons 2013-09-04 klockan 17:29 +0300 skrev Susi Lehtola: On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 08:55:36 -0400 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: I could change perl-Alien-ROOT from noarch to architecture specific, but that's cheating and more seriously it just shifts the problem in the reverese

Re: UTF-8 locale in RPM build

sön 2013-08-25 klockan 23:13 +0200 skrev punto...@libero.it: Il 25/08/2013 22:17, Ian Pilcher ha scritto: I'm trying to build a jpackage SRPM (jena-iri) on Fedora 19, and it's failing, because the locale (LANG) is apparently set to C during the build. (javac and javadoc don't like

Re: Bundled Flash

fre 2013-08-23 klockan 16:46 -0700 skrev Adam Williamson: But if I'm going to do it, I'd rather get the replace-dir-with-symlink stuff 'right' (for whatever value we decide is 'right') first time. The shortest scriptlet I saw to remove a directory in pretrans is: (see e.g.

Re: [EPEL] gimp-paint-studio failed to build on el6

tor 2013-08-15 klockan 11:57 -0700 skrev Luya Tshimbalanga: Hello, I wonder why the build failed[1] despite assigning a quotation on a doc file listed on: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gimp-paint-studio.git/tree/gimp-paint-studio.spec?h=el6 Is there a way to fix that? Ref

License change: xrootd

Hi! The License tag of the xrootd package ha changed from BSD to LGPLv3+ due to an upstream license change. Mattias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora

Review swaps

Hi I have a few review requests that I would like to arrange swaps for: 3 packages related to particle physics simulation: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877275 Review Request: lhapdf - Les Houches Accord PDF Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877396 Review

Re: package, package2, package3 naming-with-version exploit

tor 2013-04-04 klockan 17:29 +0200 skrev Vít Ondruch: Dne 4.4.2013 16:20, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a): esthetics. May be I misunderstood the thread, but wasn't this the main point since the beginning? To prevent the naming-with-version exploit as is still stated in the $SUBJECT? It

gsoap updated to version 2.8.12 in rawhide

Hi! The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.12 in rawhide only. Dependent packages (gfal, gridsite, lcgdm, lcgdm-dav, srm-ifce, voms) must rebuild. Mattias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: rawhide report: 20121228 changes

ons 2013-01-02 klockan 14:03 +0100 skrev Vít Ondruch: Dne 2.1.2013 13:19, Panu Matilainen napsal(a): On 01/02/2013 01:53 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 28.12.2012 15:39, Michael Scherer napsal(a): [root] root-graf3d-gl-5.34.02-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.1.7()(64bit) doesn't

Review swaps

Hi! I am looking for reviewers and am willing to make reviews in return. Three renamed packages due to upstream name changes: globus-gram-job-manager-fork: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772986 globus-gram-job-manager-pbs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772988

gsoap updated in F17 and rawhide

Hi! gsoap was updated to version 2.8.7 in F17 and rawhide. Due to changes to the struct soap the soname of the libraries was bumped from 1 to 2. Dependent packages needs to rebuild: lcgdm lcgdm-dav srm-ifce voms Mattias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel

Globus Toolkit updated to version 5.2

Hi! The packages containing software from the Globus Toolkit have been updated to Globus Toolkit version 5.2 in rawhide. The update for Fedora 15 and 16 and EPEL is currently in the testing repo, and buildroot overrides are also in place for these releases. Many of the changes implemented by

Re: Owning /usr/share/icons/hicolor

mån 2011-10-31 klockan 19:02 +0100 skrev Till Maas: On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:42:59AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: Are the fedora-logos and setroubleshoot packages doing it the right way, and other icon-installing packages need to be fixed? Are they doing it the wrong way, and should be

gsoap updated in rawhide

Hi! The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.4 in rawhide only. Depending packages should rebuild: - CGSI-gSOAP - lcgdm - voms - VirtualBox-OSE (rpmfusion) Mattias Ellert gsoap co-maintainer smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing

gsoap updated to version 2.8.3 in rawhide and F16

* VirtualBox-OSE The first three are maintained by me and updates have already been created. VirtualBox-OSE is from rpmfusion. the maintainer is CC on this mail. Regards, Mattias Ellert gsoap co-maintainer smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing

Re: Oh god, my eyes (packaging a hairball of bundled PHP stuff, tt-rss)

ons 2011-08-31 klockan 10:17 +0300 skrev Yanko Kaneti: # repoquery -f '*/jquery*.js' --qf=%{NAME}\n | sort | uniq | wc -l 356 jQuery FTW :) Most of these are probably doxygen generated documentation. Recent versions of doxygen provides a search option for the generated html documentation

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2011-06-16 x86_64

ons 2011-06-22 klockan 19:17 -0500 skrev Matt Domsch: Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 using rawhide from 2011-06-16 Good hunting! lcgdm-1.8.0.1-7.fc16 (build/make) ellert,stevetraylen This is already resolved (by an update of CGSI-gSOAP). The package built fine on

Re: patch only if dependent version x? (rpm spec)

fre 2011-06-03 klockan 07:19 -0400 skrev Neal Becker: So it is ultimately conditioned on fedora version, not foo-devel version. OK. It seems more direct to condition on foo-devel version. Is that unreasonable? Or just too difficult? You can do it on the version of the software.

Re: mass rebuild of mysql packages in F-15

ons 2011-03-23 klockan 12:11 -0400 skrev Marcela Maslanova: Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be needed mass rebuild. dhorak will build these, which are not rebuild yet. After that will be created one big update, so please don't file your own updates into

gsoap updated to 2.7.17 in F15 and rawhide

Hi! The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.7.17 in F15 and rawhide. This update also turns on the IPv6 support in the provided gsoap libraries. Due to the IPv6 support dependent packages need to be rebuilt. According to repoquery the following packages are affected: condor lcgdm

Re: gsoap updated to 2.7.17 in F15 and rawhide

mån 2011-02-14 klockan 13:12 +0100 skrev Mattias Ellert: Hi! The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.7.17 in F15 and rawhide. PS. I have requested a buildroot override in F15. Mattias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing list devel

Re: New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

fre 2010-08-27 klockan 08:31 -0700 skrev Jesse Keating: Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se wrote: tor 2010-08-26 klockan 13:27 -0700 skrev Jesse Keating: Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: Jesse Keating, Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:44:34 -0700: I just submitted updates for el5

Re: New fedpkg build coming to an update repo near you!

tor 2010-08-26 klockan 13:27 -0700 skrev Jesse Keating: Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: Jesse Keating, Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:44:34 -0700: I just submitted updates for el5 and f1{2,3,4} as well as a build for rawhide (f15) of a new fedpkg build. Here is a summary from the rpm: EL6?

Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages

fre 2010-07-16 klockan 18:26 +0800 skrev Chen Lei: I think using git repo for meego packages have more harm than benefit, because the most important feature for rpm is people can validate the md5sum of the source tarball easily. Unless special case we can't find a way to get reliable souce

Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

ons 2010-07-07 klockan 16:29 -0400 skrev Tom spot Callaway: Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fixed. Thanks! ~spot