Re: Anyone interested in packaging + maintaining the nimble language?

2023-09-12 Thread Maxwell G
On Tue Sep 12, 2023 at 09:21 +0200, Sandro wrote: > On 12-09-2023 03:36, Maxwell G wrote: > >> It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is anyone using it, and would > >> like to package + maintain it for Fedora? > > IIRC, we used to have nim in Fedora and then it was retired. > > Indeed. That

Re: Anyone interested in packaging + maintaining the nimble language?

2023-09-12 Thread Ondrej Mosnáček
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 9:22 AM Sandro wrote: > > On 12-09-2023 03:36, Maxwell G wrote: > >> It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is anyone using it, and would > >> like to package + maintain it for Fedora? > > IIRC, we used to have nim in Fedora and then it was retired. > > Indeed. That may

Re: Anyone interested in packaging + maintaining the nimble language?

2023-09-12 Thread Sandro
On 12-09-2023 03:36, Maxwell G wrote: It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is anyone using it, and would like to package + maintain it for Fedora? IIRC, we used to have nim in Fedora and then it was retired. Indeed. That may be a good starting point. There's also nim-srpm-macros [1],

Re: Anyone interested in packaging + maintaining the nimble language?

2023-09-12 Thread Sandro
On 11-09-2023 21:05, Michel Lind wrote: It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is anyone using it, and would like to package + maintain it for Fedora? This looks like an interesting language, so #whynot (famous last words). Would you be interested in co-maintaining? I think if Nim makes

Re: Anyone interested in packaging + maintaining the nimble language?

2023-09-11 Thread Jason Tibbitts
> Maxwell G writes: > IIRC, we used to have nim in Fedora and then it was retired. Yes, it was in Fedora 33 but orphaned for some time and then retired. The last version packaged was 1.0.4. The final spec doesn't look very complicated but of course it's tough to say how that would apply to

Re: Anyone interested in packaging + maintaining the nimble language?

2023-09-11 Thread Maxwell G
On Sun Sep 10, 2023 at 22:04 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have a package that has begun to use the nimble language in its new > version: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181693 > https://nim-lang.org/ > > It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is anyone using it,

Re: Anyone interested in packaging + maintaining the nimble language?

2023-09-11 Thread Michel Lind
Hi Ankur, On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 10:04:18PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have a package that has begun to use the nimble language in its new > version: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181693 > https://nim-lang.org/ > > It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is

Anyone interested in packaging + maintaining the nimble language?

2023-09-10 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hi folks, I have a package that has begun to use the nimble language in its new version: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181693 https://nim-lang.org/ It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is anyone using it, and would like to package + maintain it for Fedora? -- Thanks,