On Wed Jul 26, 2023 at 14:09 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 01:39:47PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 8:23 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for
> > >
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 01:39:47PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 8:23 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen
> wrote:
> >
> > I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for
> > (modern) Language SIGs. I think for this to be successful we need
> >
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 6:11 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 13. 07. 23 v 10:45 Florian Festi napsal(a):
> > As it is relevant for this meeting may be someone that attended my
> > workshop can give a 3 or 5 minute summary of the new Dynamic Spec
>
> I can volunteer. I was on your workshop and I
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 12:56 AM Ron Olson wrote:
> There isn’t a SIG, and I don’t know if there’s any interest really, but
> I’d be happy to tell my tales of packaging Swift for Fedora. :\
>
Sure, such perspectives are definitely also welcome - this will be a broad
discussion.
In many cases
There isn’t a SIG, and I don’t know if there’s any interest
really, but I’d be happy to tell my tales of packaging Swift for
Fedora. :\
Ron
On 5 Jul 2023, at 1:22, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session
for
(modern) Language SIGs. I
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 6:09 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 7/13/23 11:52, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On 7/13/23 11:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 5:25 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 7/5/23 02:22, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> I have
On 7/13/23 11:52, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 7/13/23 11:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 5:25 PM Demi Marie Obenour
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/5/23 02:22, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for
(modern)
On 7/13/23 11:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 5:25 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/5/23 02:22, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
>>> I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for
>>> (modern) Language SIGs. I think for this to be successful we
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 5:25 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 7/5/23 02:22, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> > I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for
> > (modern) Language SIGs. I think for this to be successful we need
> > representatives from various Language
On 7/5/23 02:22, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for
> (modern) Language SIGs. I think for this to be successful we need
> representatives from various Language SIGs to be there (Rust, Haskell,
> OCaml, Golang and of course Python
Dne 13. 07. 23 v 10:45 Florian Festi napsal(a):
As it is relevant for this meeting may be someone that attended my
workshop can give a 3 or 5 minute summary of the new Dynamic Spec
I can volunteer. I was on your workshop and I will be at Flock.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit
This is great to see! The issue of lack of coordination and
collaboration between the language SIGs also came up in my workshop on
DevConf [1]. Having them share more code/macros and spec file idioms
would make packaging as a whole easier. Not re-inventing solutions for
the same or at least
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 8:23 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
>
> I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for
> (modern) Language SIGs. I think for this to be successful we need
> representatives from various Language SIGs to be there (Rust, Haskell, OCaml,
> Golang
Oops, somehow I forgot Ruby -- anyway all Lang ecosystem SIGs participation
to welcome and encouraged of course.
On Wed, 5 July 2023, 14:22 Jens-Ulrik Petersen, wrote:
> I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for
> (modern) Language SIGs. I think for this to be
On 05/07/2023 08:22, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session
for (modern) Language SIGs. I think for this to be successful we need
representatives from various Language SIGs to be there (Rust, Haskell,
OCaml, Golang and of course Python
I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for
(modern) Language SIGs. I think for this to be successful we need
representatives from various Language SIGs to be there (Rust, Haskell,
OCaml, Golang and of course Python and older ecosystems like Perl, R, TeX
come to mind
16 matches
Mail list logo
