On 03/06/2014 06:00 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 03:50:37PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
For instance we named a release beefy miracle and that might have
been offensive for some people (ex. in India)., but
apparently no one cared enough to officially complain.
Additionally,
Hi,
I don't think that worrying about perpetuating offensive stereotypes
is specifc to the US, we have similar controversies in Europe:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banania#Controversy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwarte_Piet#Controversies
Anyway, the line between what is acceptable and
On 03/06/2014 09:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2014 03:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I certainly did file a complaint against generic-logos which has
a similar problem with Fedora Board which in turn dismissed my
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 03/06/2014 09:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2014 03:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I certainly did file a complaint against
On 03/07/2014 10:59 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
Hi,
I don't think that worrying about perpetuating offensive stereotypes
is specifc to the US, we have similar controversies in Europe:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banania#Controversy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwarte_Piet#Controversies
Well, read
On 03/07/2014 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 03/06/2014 09:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2014 03:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I certainly
2014-03-07 12:16 GMT+01:00 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de:
On 03/07/2014 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681339#c31
OK, that's better than nothing, but this still is just one individual's
position and is far from being an official position.
See
On 03/07/2014 02:32 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-03-07 12:16 GMT+01:00 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de
mailto:rc040...@freenet.de:
On 03/07/2014 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681339#c31
OK, that's better than nothing, but this still
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 12:17 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/07/2014 10:59 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
Hi,
I don't think that worrying about perpetuating offensive stereotypes
is specifc to the US, we have similar controversies in Europe:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banania#Controversy
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 12:17 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/07/2014 10:59 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
Hi,
I don't think that worrying about perpetuating offensive stereotypes
is specifc to the US, we have similar
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 22:52 +0100, drago01 wrote:
There is at least one starkly obvious difference there, which is that
you choose your religious beliefs and affiliations; you do not choose
your race/color/general genetic origin.
Well people can choose to not be offended by random images
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 22:52 +0100, drago01 wrote:
There is at least one starkly obvious difference there, which is that
you choose your religious beliefs and affiliations; you do not choose
your race/color/general
Am 07.03.2014 23:33, schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 22:52 +0100, drago01 wrote:
There is at least one starkly obvious difference there, which is that
you choose your religious beliefs and affiliations; you do not choose
your race/color/general genetic origin.
Well people
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 23:57 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 22:52 +0100, drago01 wrote:
There is at least one starkly obvious difference there, which is that
you choose your religious beliefs and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2014 02:06 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 03:57:02PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
* #1230Requesting FESCo address Cherokee logo issue
(notting, 18:48:47) * LINK:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1230 (notting,
sgallagh wrote:
Seriously? Retiring useful package? Isn't that a bit of
overkill? (Yes, I'm grumpy because I'm using Cherokee).
This has been discussed ad nauseam.
The reasoning was that upstream ships imagery that is in violation of
Fedora's policy not to ship offensive material. [...]
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler f...@redhat.com wrote:
sgallagh wrote:
Seriously? Retiring useful package? Isn't that a bit of
overkill? (Yes, I'm grumpy because I'm using Cherokee).
This has been discussed ad nauseam.
The reasoning was that upstream ships imagery that
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 15:50:37 +0100,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
For instance we named a release beefy miracle and that might have
been offensive for some people (ex. in India)., but
apparently no one cared enough to officially complain.
That depends on what you mean by official. I
Hi
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:50 AM, drago01 wrote:
For instance we named a release beefy miracle and that might have
been offensive for some people (ex. in India)., but
apparently no one cared enough to officially complain.
I certainly did file a complaint against generic-logos which has a
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 03:50:37PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
For instance we named a release beefy miracle and that might have
been offensive for some people (ex. in India)., but
apparently no one cared enough to officially complain.
Additionally, there is a fundamental difference here. The
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 03:50:37PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
For instance we named a release beefy miracle and that might have
been offensive for some people (ex. in India)., but
apparently no one cared enough to
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 15:50:37 +0100,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
For instance we named a release beefy miracle and that might have
been offensive for some people (ex. in India)., but
apparently no one cared
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I certainly did file a complaint against generic-logos which has a similar
problem with Fedora Board which in turn dismissed my concern and failed to
answer my follow up question and I gave up on it. That is of course
artwork that Fedora itself is upstream of rather than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2014 03:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I certainly did file a complaint against generic-logos which has
a similar problem with Fedora Board which in turn dismissed my
concern and failed to answer my follow up question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2014 03:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 03/06/2014 03:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I certainly did file a complaint against generic-logos which
has a similar problem with Fedora Board which in turn dismissed
my
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2014 03:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 03/06/2014 03:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I certainly did file a complaint against generic-logos which
has a similar problem with Fedora Board which
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-03-05)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:59:49 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-03-05/fesco.2014-03-05-17.59.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 03:57:02PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
* #1230Requesting FESCo address Cherokee logo issue (notting,
18:48:47)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1230 (notting,
18:48:47)
* AGREED: FESCo decision reiterated. Package will be retired Monday
28 matches
Mail list logo
