On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Kendall Bennett wrote:
Andrew C Aitchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
X -configure comments these values out because many apps used to
get confused by having precise dpi values and displayed silly
fonts. I think that at one time a 85x90 dpi screen would make
Netscape
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Note that CONFIG_INPUT (the new input layer) exists in 2.4.x kernels
as well... so you can test right now. It's just that 2.5.x (and
2.6.0 when released) has made the new input layer the default.
I'm not really up to speed on the 2.4 stuff, never
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:19:37PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Are you speaking about the current 4.3.0 or the stuff you are working on ?
What I was working on.
Ok, ...
I take it, there will be a 4.4.0 before 5.0 ?
Well, i am not sure i follow you completely here, but my interrest in
MV but XAA is an all or nothing thing.
Could you please explain that? Do you mean that if you use XAA, you
can no longer wrap at the GCOps level?
Juliusz
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SD some fonts can't be displayed any more which worked with freetype1
SD based freetype module
Yes. The FreeType 1 library had been fine-tuned to include
workarounds for a number of common font bugs (much against David
Turner's preferences). These hacks are only now getting into
FreeType 2.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:19:37PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:04:06PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Are you speaking about the current 4.3.0 or the stuff you are working on ?
What I was working on.
BTW, is the stuff you were working on accessible on a CVS branch or
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 03:18, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
Hmmm. I've never tried it on a PowerBook. I guess I will have
to see if I can borrow one from around here to play with. Unfortunately,
that means it's unlikely to be fixed in 4.3 (I recall having a difficult
time with Linux PPC
The discussion thread
has focused on multi-head for a single user. What about plans for multi-user? Matrox
and Nvidia have four port cards. Why couldnt a single system (maybe multi-processor)
support eight simultaneous users if it had two of those cards and USB input
devices? What would be
On 1 Mar 2003, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
MV but XAA is an all or nothing thing.
Could you please explain that? Do you mean that if you use XAA, you
can no longer wrap at the GCOps level?
You can wrap them, but if you are above XAA you MUST call down.
XAA expects to see every rendering
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
That said, another thing that would be nice, would be the possibility to
specify one display section for every depth, instead of just copying it
for each supported depth. Do many people in these times of 64+Mo of
onboard memory specify different
On Saturday 01 March 2003 03:18, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
Can you VT switch back to the X-server OK, and startx again after
quitting?
Yes, I can.
If so, it's probably just a matter of not enough stuff
being saved and restored in the UnLoad/LoadStateExt functions in
riva_hw.c.
Hmm, how can
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Christoph Pittracher wrote:
On Saturday 01 March 2003 03:18, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
Can you VT switch back to the X-server OK, and startx again after
quitting?
Yes, I can.
If so, it's probably just a matter of not enough stuff
being saved and restored in the
setjmp is a *macro* (for __sigsetjmp) defined in /usr/include/setjmp.h.
This is libc 2.2. so it doesn't set HAS_GLIBC_SIGSETJMP.
SYMCFUNCALIAS chokes on this. This is gcc 2.95.3.
I think the HAS_GLIBC_SIGSETJMP set logic is wrong.
Mark.
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
setjmp is a *macro* (for __sigsetjmp) defined in /usr/include/setjmp.h.
This is libc 2.2. so it doesn't set HAS_GLIBC_SIGSETJMP.
SYMCFUNCALIAS chokes on this. This is gcc 2.95.3.
I think the HAS_GLIBC_SIGSETJMP set logic is wrong.
You've got
Regard to that one BUG with the mention that it persist in 4.3.0 too
and any CVS too:
By Rene:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xfree86m=104526841725691w=2
By mysef:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xfree86m=104385693307371w=2
I send more deBug:
15 matches
Mail list logo