Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-05 Thread Alexander Pohoyda
Egbert Eich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] static int doScalable; static int doBitmaps; -static int doEncodings; +static int onlyEncodings; +static int onlyEncodings; A typo? -- Alexander Pohoyda [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Devel mailing list

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-03 Thread Egbert Eich
Kean Johnston writes: Egbert Eich wrote: Juliusz, Kean, please check below and tell me if it does what you expect. Mostly, except for the -x stuff. Can you and Juliusz apply and try the attached patch? This doesnt include the X11.tmpl cleanup portion of my original patch, but ti does

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-03 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
RM Weired. I don't see that problem when running mkfontscale RM (Solaris2.7/SPARC build with Sun Workshop/Forte 7) ... Try -e. Juliusz ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-03 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
KJ I am in favour (personally) of making -x mean eXclude a suffix KJ and perhaps changing the current mkfontscale's -x to -a, for (a)dd KJ an encoding. I agree. Juliusz ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-03 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
From the code I don't see a difference in order between you version and Juliusz's either, am I wrong? KJ No you're not. I didnt know if those semantics were important so I KJ didn't change them. I am not sure they are important, but since this KJ is a replacement for mkfontdir, I think it is

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-03 Thread Roland Mainz
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: RM Weired. I don't see that problem when running mkfontscale RM (Solaris2.7/SPARC build with Sun Workshop/Forte 7) ... Try -e. That's what I did (% mkfontscale-e $PWD # in the encodings/ dir) ... Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-02 Thread Egbert Eich
Juliusz Chroboczek writes: What sort of checking was done before replaceing mkfontdir with mkfontscale ? EE I had the impression that this had been tested to some extend. Egbert, I am sorry if I misled you. No problem. I guess it was my mistake. So far submitted code was

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-02 Thread Kean Johnston
Egbert Eich wrote: This is really difficult. I have compared Julisz's and Kean's patches. Juliusz doesn't implement the -r option while Kean's code doesn't fix the '(null)' problem, Kean doesn't generate an encodings file if no encodings are to be processed while Juliusz generates one containing a

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-02 Thread Egbert Eich
Kean Johnston writes: Yes, if we don't have an improved version by the end of the week I will revert this. I didnt see any comment on my message ... did you see my patch from yesterday that implements the -r and -n options? I'm sorry I have overlooked your posting. I've combined

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-02 Thread Roland Mainz
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: With Roland's fix, mkfontscale generates encodings.dir files containing the string (null), ie with lines like: big5-0 (null)(null)large/big5.eten-0.enc big5.eten-0 (null)large/big5.eten-0.enc viscii1.1-1 (null)./viscii1.1-1.enc.gz adobe-symbol

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-01 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
AA What sort of checking was done before replaceing mkfontdir with AA mkfontscale ? None; there's been a problem of assignment of responsibility. Please see bug 388, where I'm assuming somebody will do the testing before committing (or decide not to commit until there's testing), and Egbert

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-01 Thread Egbert Eich
Dr Andrew C Aitchison writes: With Roland's fix, mkfontscale generates encodings.dir files containing the string (null), ie with lines like: big5-0 (null)(null)large/big5.eten-0.enc big5.eten-0 (null)large/big5.eten-0.enc viscii1.1-1 (null)./viscii1.1-1.enc.gz adobe-symbol

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-01 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
What sort of checking was done before replaceing mkfontdir with mkfontscale ? EE I had the impression that this had been tested to some extend. Egbert, I am sorry if I misled you. I had tested the mkfontdir replacement on the font directories I hold on my laptop. I did not test this on a

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-01 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Egbert Eich wrote: Having build options for all kinds of experimental stuff doesn't sound like a realistic solution. Better to have some sandbox separate from the main tree. True. If we had known that this was experimental, a branch of the CVS tree would have made sense.

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-01 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
AA any idea whether this is the right solution ? Please try the attached instead. Juliusz Index: xc/programs/mkfontscale/mkfontscale.c === RCS file:

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-01 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Please test http://bugs.xfree86.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=425 Juliusz ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: mkfontscale strikes again

2003-07-01 Thread Kean Johnston
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: Please test http://bugs.xfree86.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=425 This fixes the -n -r problems for me, and compiles OK. However, are you trying to emulate the exact semantic behavious of mkfontdir? If so then the way you implement doEncodings is incorrect. In