Re: Install errors with 4.3.0 on RH7.3?

2003-03-21 Thread Kendall Bennett
Andrew C Aitchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks to me as if your make World failed (but kept going as it usually does) so install tried again and failed. I have xc/programs/rstart/contexts/@Aliases xc/programs/rstart/samples/contexts.odt1/@Aliases

_XAllocTemp and _XFreeTemp in Xrender on X11R5

2003-03-21 Thread Albert Chin
I tried building Xrender from XFree86-4.3.0 on Solaris 2.5.1 (X11R5). It has neither _XAllocTemp or _XFreeTemp. Any way to work around this in Xrender/Picture.c? -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: xfig crashes XFree86 server (4.3.0) with trident driver

2003-03-21 Thread Gary E. RAFE, Ph.D.
! If it's reproducible and you can get a gdb backtrace, that would !be useful. Baring that, seeing it if goes away with Option NoAccel !would at least narrow things down. I gave this another go with a newly-built debug server, XAA and trident driver modules, and got the following backtrace

Re: xfig crashes XFree86 server (4.3.0) with trident driver

2003-03-21 Thread Mark Vojkovich
Sorry, I meant a backtrace of XFree86, not of xfig. Mark. On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Gary E. RAFE, Ph.D. wrote: ! If it's reproducible and you can get a gdb backtrace, that would !be useful. Baring that, seeing it if goes away with Option NoAccel !would at least

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-21 Thread Jos Fonseca
No DRI developer expressed his interest or opposition, probably because there isn't opposition, or simply no interest. In either case I see no reasons why not proceed, so I'll open a bug to address this. I'll ask that [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the same addressed used on SF BT system) is set as the

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-21 Thread Keith Whitwell
José Fonseca wrote: No DRI developer expressed his interest or opposition, probably because there isn't opposition, or simply no interest. In either case I see no reasons why not proceed, so I'll open a bug to address this. I'll ask that [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the same addressed used on SF BT system)

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fre, 2003-03-21 at 21:07, José Fonseca wrote: No DRI developer expressed his interest or opposition, probably because there isn't opposition, or simply no interest. In either case I see no reasons why not proceed, so I'll open a bug to address this. I'll ask that [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the same