David Dawes wrote:
I believe that this is an acknowlegement that the core team was no longer
representative of the active, experienced and skilled XFree86 developers,
or a place where technical discussion happens.
Such an acknowledgement could have been derived long ago from the
dissention
For this type of debugging, I usually just telnet it from another box.
Kirk Haderlie wrote:
Is it possible to debug XFree86 using a dual monitor setup on a
single machine. I tried using -keeptty but this doesn't do what I
would expect. Can X be run on one monitor and a debug console on the
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:04:56AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Richard A. Hecker wrote:
I will add my own Rant here. Ignoring email from Joe Public who
bought his 'Puter from Walmart' might work, but I feel 'Dissed'
when a person insults my intelligence
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 03:10:14AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
...snip...
More likely than not it is a case of it's better to not say
anything at all, than to try and be honest and explain your
position and then have people attack you endlessly with more
ferocity than they'd have done
Tim Roberts wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:00:35 -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:19:29AM -0800, Tim Roberts wrote:
After coming in to find 170-odd messages from the new [Devel] list in my
inbox, I decided to switch to digest mode. However, mailman tells me that
the list
Mark Vojkovich wrote:
...snip...
Where I work, bug tracking is necessarily tied to source control
in rather strict ways. Ways that I don't necessarily like, and
would not want to see XFree86 emulate. But I can envision non-
intrusive bug tracking.
Mark.
This
