Re: [Development] Long time before becoming approver?

2011-11-03 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 3 de November de 2011 09:50:45 eike.zil...@nokia.com wrote: Btw, I don't think the governance model handles how changes to the governance model itself are done And how do we handle the changes to the way the model is changed? :-) -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com

Re: [Development] Long time before becoming approver?

2011-11-03 Thread Leandro T. C. Melo
On 11/3/2011 10:50 AM, ext eike.zil...@nokia.com wrote: One could also handle the relevant people might be on vacation issue by giving approvers a probation period where they are approvers in gerrit, but the status can be revoked without the hassle of a vote of no confidence, to give people

Re: [Development] Installing Qt5Config.cmake from the Qt repo?

2011-11-03 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 3 de November de 2011 11:48:24 Stephen Kelly wrote: No problem. If I understand you correctly, that's already the plan. # Network and DBus are optional find_package(Qt5 COMPONENTS Network DBus) if(Qt5Network_FOUND) # ... endif() if(Qt5DBus_FOUND) # ... endif() #

Re: [Development] QThread::finished() race → fixing QThread

2011-11-03 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Thursday 03 November 2011 11:37:25 Thiago Macieira wrote: Hello First of all, required reading: http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2010/06/17/youre-doing-it-wrong/ == Background == Today, I was told that there was a timing sensitive test in QDBusPendingCall's unit testing. Looking at the

Re: [Development] QThread::finished() race → fixing QThread

2011-11-03 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
2011/11/3 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com: == Larger implications == The crux of the issue is that finished() is emitted by QThreadPrivate::finish(), which is run from *inside* the thread that is finishing. Depending on how you interpret finished(), that is a contradiction. If you

[Development] Possible QDoc bug - no doc generated for a static overloaded method

2011-11-03 Thread Tomasz Siekierda
Hi, as Andre suggested, I am bringing an issue for attention here. My original post: http://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewthread/8914/ QDoc does not generate documentation for QWebServiceMethod::invokeMethod() static overloaded function, while the other (non-static) overload works fine. No

Re: [Development] API review for a new QDnsResolver class

2011-11-03 Thread Peter Hartmann
On 11/03/2011 12:40 PM, ext Jeremy Lainé wrote: Based on some initial feedback I received regarding DNS SRV support in Qt, I have refactored my proposed code and introduced a QDnsResolver class which I would like to submit for API review. The point of this class is to provide a QNAM-style

Re: [Development] QThread::finished() race → fixing QThread

2011-11-03 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 3 de November de 2011 14:36:09 Olivier Goffart wrote: Now that you mention it, this is a regression against Qt 4.7, (isRunning and isFinished used to lock) hence the patch: http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,8063 (that should be applied to Qt 4.8 please) That is not

Re: [Development] QThread::finished() race → fixing QThread

2011-11-03 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Thursday 03 November 2011 15:56:20 Thiago Macieira wrote: On Thursday, 3 de November de 2011 14:36:09 Olivier Goffart wrote: Now that you mention it, this is a regression against Qt 4.7, (isRunning and isFinished used to lock) hence the patch:

[Development] Mailing list for community / web / marketing / events

2011-11-03 Thread Quim Gil
Hi, I want to propose the creation of a mailing list focusing on marketing, events and misc community activities not directly related with software development: - qt-project.org content. - Marketing activities. - Organization and involvement in events. ... The problem is that many of the

Re: [Development] Installing Qt5Config.cmake from the Qt repo?

2011-11-03 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Thursday, November 03, 2011 01:05:49 Stephen Kelly wrote: I think ossi still has some feedback on it that we can work on later, but I've tested it, and it works just as the shell script version worked. Additionally, as most of the reusable functionality is now defined in the mkspec

Re: [Development] API review for a new QDnsResolver class

2011-11-03 Thread Peter Hartmann
On 11/03/2011 04:12 PM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: (...) The DNS query is not the problem. A query is always composed of a domain name being queried, along with the DNS class (Internet, no one uses anything else for real purposes) and the record type. For the record type, it's very easy to

Re: [Development] Installing Qt5Config.cmake from the Qt repo?

2011-11-03 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Wednesday 02 November 2011, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Wednesday, 2 de November de 2011 13:38:15 Stephen Kelly wrote: ... http://blogs.kde.org/node/4495 How does it know which files are my headers? It needs to have a list somewhere, which needs to be given to the Qt5 macros. It cannot

Re: [Development] Installing Qt5Config.cmake from the Qt repo?

2011-11-03 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 03 November 2011, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Thursday, 3 de November de 2011 11:48:24 Stephen Kelly wrote: No problem. If I understand you correctly, that's already the plan. # Network and DBus are optional find_package(Qt5 COMPONENTS Network DBus) if(Qt5Network_FOUND)

Re: [Development] [cmake-developers] Installing Qt5Config.cmake from the Qt repo?

2011-11-03 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 03 November 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: On 11/03/11 19:44, ext Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Wednesday 02 November 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: and neither does foo/bar/libbaz.so. Why ? it's not abstract. This is in itself neither an advantage nor a problem. The