Re: [PATCH 3/3] can: Kconfig: CAN_AT91 depends on ARCH_AT91

2013-03-11 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:44:54PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: On 03/08/2013 06:30 PM, ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com wrote: From: Ludovic Desroches ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com SAMA5D3 devices also embed CAN feature. Moreover if we want to produce a single kernel image (at least for

Re: [PATCH 3/3] can: Kconfig: CAN_AT91 depends on ARCH_AT91

2013-03-11 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 03/11/2013 10:24 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote: On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:44:54PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: On 03/08/2013 06:30 PM, ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com wrote: From: Ludovic Desroches ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com SAMA5D3 devices also embed CAN feature. Moreover if we want to

[PATCH 3/3] can: Kconfig: CAN_AT91 depends on ARCH_AT91

2013-03-08 Thread ludovic.desroches
From: Ludovic Desroches ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com SAMA5D3 devices also embed CAN feature. Moreover if we want to produce a single kernel image (at least for Atmel devices) it is not useful to be too restrictive. Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com ---

Re: [PATCH 3/3] can: Kconfig: CAN_AT91 depends on ARCH_AT91

2013-03-08 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 03/08/2013 06:30 PM, ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com wrote: From: Ludovic Desroches ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com SAMA5D3 devices also embed CAN feature. Moreover if we want to produce a single kernel image (at least for Atmel devices) it is not useful to be too restrictive. If it compiles