Re: [PATCH 1/2] video, sm501: add OF binding to support SM501

2010-12-23 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Heiko, On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 07:49:45AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote: Hello Paul, Paul Mundt wrote: On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 09:23:47AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote: - add binding to OF, compatible name smi,sm501 [...] Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |7 +

Re: [PATCH 3/4 v4] video, sm501: add OF binding to support SM501

2011-01-31 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Heiko, On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:57:38AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote: - add binding to OF, compatible name smi,sm501 The MFD part looks fine to me: Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com

Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] video, sm501: add I/O functions for use on powerpc

2011-01-31 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Heiko, On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:57:20AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote: - add read/write functions for using this driver also on powerpc plattforms Not sure whose tree this is going through. Probably Paul's one though. The mfd part looks fine to me, please add my: Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz sa

Re: [PATCH] mfd: Add basic device tree binding for wm8994

2011-12-12 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Mark, On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 06:59:28PM +, Mark Brown wrote: Add a placeholder device tree binding for the wm8994 driver. At present the binding is essentially null as none of the platform data is supported, and at least some of that will depend on the pending regulator bindings. I

Re: [PATCH v3] mfd: mc13xxx: add device tree probe support

2011-12-12 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Shawn, On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:04:43PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: It adds device tree probe support for mc13xxx mfd driver. Thanks, I applied this one. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ ___

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] regulator: mc13892: add device tree probe support

2011-12-12 Thread Samuel Ortiz
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:21:07PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: It adds device tree probe support for mc13892-regulator driver. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org Cc: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Cc: Liam Girdwood l...@ti.com Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz sa

Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] mfd: twl-core: Add initial DT support for twl4030/twl6030

2011-12-19 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Benoit, On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote: Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips. The current version is missing the regulator entries due to the lack of DT regulator bindings for the moment. Only the simple sub-modules that do not depend on

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: improve mc13xxx dt binding document

2011-12-22 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Shawn, On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:00:44PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: It improves mc13xxx dt binding document on how the regulator name is being used for binding a mc13892 regulator device. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org Cc: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com Thanks, patch

Re: [PATCH v4 03/12] mfd: twl-core: Add initial DT support for twl4030/twl6030

2011-12-22 Thread Samuel Ortiz
on platform_data information can be initialized properly. Add irqdomain support. Add documentation for the Texas Instruments TWL Integrated Chip. Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson b-cous...@ti.com Cc: Balaji T K balaj...@ti.com Cc: Graeme Gregory g...@slimlogic.co.uk Cc: Samuel Ortiz sa

Re: [PATCH v4 03/12] mfd: twl-core: Add initial DT support for twl4030/twl6030

2012-01-08 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Benoit, On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote: On 1/2/2012 10:04 AM, Grant Likely wrote: On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 03:56:37PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote: Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips. The current version is missing the regulator entries

Re: [PATCH] devicetree: Add empty of_platform_populate() for !CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS (sparc)

2012-02-27 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Grant, On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 03:06:58PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: Sparc has its own helpers for translating address ranges when the device tree is parsed at boot time, and it isn't able to use of_platform_populate(). However, there are some device drivers that want to use that function

Re: [PATCH 1/4] regulator: twl6030: add support for vdd1, vdd2 and vdd3 regulators

2012-03-02 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Cc: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com Mark, Liam, are you guys taking this one ? Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ ___ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mfd: add irq domain support for max8997 interrupts

2012-04-16 Thread Samuel Ortiz
, the patch looks fine, you can merge it through the regulator tree with my Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com if you think that's necessary. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ ___ devicetree-discuss mailing

Re: [PATCH 0/6 v3] Update TPS65910 to boot using devicetree

2012-05-11 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Rhyland, On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:42:37AM -0700, Rhyland Klein wrote: This patch set updates the tps65910 driver to boot using devicetree. This patch set now uses the new addition to the of_regulator code, of_regulator_match to find all the regulator init data for the device. Rhyland

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] MFD: twl6040: Device tree support

2012-05-19 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Peter, On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 02:11:54PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: Hello, Changes since v2: - Child devices are no longer described in dts, they are created with mfd_add_devices() - ASoC codec device is created unconditionally (main function of twl6040) Changes since v1: -

Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: tps65910: add support for enabling external 32-kHz oscillator

2012-07-05 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Johan, On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:20:20PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: These patches (against v3.5-rc4) add support for enabling the external 32-kHz oscillator input in tps6591x devices. Depending on boot-mode, the internal RC-oscillator may be used by default and the external

Re: [PATCH] mfd: add tps65910 32-kHz-crystal-input init

2012-07-16 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Johan, On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:44:33PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: Replace tps65910_misc_init with a dedicated init function for the 32-kHz-crystal input. Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold jhov...@gmail.com --- Hi Samuel, How about something like this? My thought with misc_init was

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mfd: dt: add power off support for Tegra20/Tegra30

2012-09-11 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Bill, On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 06:07:54PM -0700, Bill Huang wrote: This patch series add new property into regulator DT for telling whether or not to hook pmic's power off routine to system call pm_power_off. Patch 1 add power off support for Tegra20 boards using TPS6586x Patch 2 add

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mfd: dt: add power off support for Tegra20/Tegra30

2012-09-11 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Stephen, On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:15:07AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: On 09/11/2012 04:46 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:25:14PM +0800, Bill Huang wrote: Hi all, Could somebody review this? Given that I haven't been able to test yet (due to time

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mfd: dt: add power off support for Tegra20/Tegra30

2012-09-11 Thread Samuel Ortiz
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:26:55AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: On 09/11/2012 10:08 AM, Samuel Ortiz wrote: Hi Stephen, On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:15:07AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: On 09/11/2012 04:46 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:25:14PM +0800, Bill Huang

Re: [PATCH V4 REPOST] mfd: add MAX8907 core driver

2012-09-15 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Stephen, On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:29:04AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: On 09/06/2012 05:10 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Gyungoh Yoo jack@maxim-ic.com The MAX8907 is an I2C-based power-management IC containing voltage regulators, a reset controller, a real-time clock, and a

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] add syscon driver based on regmap for general registers access

2012-09-17 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Dong, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 06:10:29PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: Hi Samuel, On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:54:12PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: Hi Samuel, The series needs to go via mfd or arm-soc tree as a whole. In case you want to take it through mfd tree, here is my ack.

Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] MFD/ASoC/Input: twl4030-audio submodule DT support

2012-09-18 Thread Samuel Ortiz
to take the whole thing, in which case you can add my: Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com to the MFD patches. Please let me know how you'd like to proceed. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] MFD/GPIO: Add twl6040 GPO driver

2012-09-19 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Peter, On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:13:12PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: Hello, Changes since v1: - Removed the ti,use-gpo property from DT bindings - Register the GPO driver if we booted with DT blob or in legacy if the pdata for the GPO driver is present - DT binding Documentation

Re: [PATCH REPOST] mfd: max8907: add power off control

2012-09-19 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Stephen, On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 04:51:19PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com Add DT property maxim,system-power-controller to indicate whether the PMIC is in charge of controlling the system power. If this is set, the driver will provide the

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] MFD/GPIO: Add twl6040 GPO driver

2012-09-19 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Peter, On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:13:12PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: Hello, Changes since v1: - Removed the ti,use-gpo property from DT bindings - Register the GPO driver if we booted with DT blob or in legacy if the pdata for the GPO driver is present - DT binding Documentation

Re: [PATCH 4/4] mfd: max8907: remove regulator-compatible from DT docs

2012-09-25 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Stephen, On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:25:03PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com Commit regulator: deprecate regulator-compatible DT property deprecated the use of the regulator-compatible DT property. Update the DT example in the MAX8907 binding

Re: [PATCHv3 1/4] mfd: smsc: Add support for smsc gpio io/keypad driver

2012-10-01 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Sourav, On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:31:22PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote: smsc ece1099 is a keyboard scan or gpio expansion device. The patch create keypad and gpio expander child for this multi function smsc driver. Tested on omap5430 evm with 3.6-rc6 custom kernel. Cc: Samuel Ortiz sa

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] mfd: tps65217: Set PMIC to shutdown on PWR_EN toggle

2012-11-21 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Anilkumar, On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:18:44PM +0530, AnilKumar Ch wrote: From: Colin Foe-Parker colin.foepar...@logicpd.com Set tps65217 PMIC status to OFF if power enable toggle is supported. By setting this bit to 1 to enter PMIC to OFF state when PWR_EN pin is pulled low. Also adds a

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: stmpe: Use devm_*() routines

2012-11-21 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Viresh, On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:01:54PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: This patch frees stmpe driver from tension of freeing resources :) devm_* derivatives of multiple routines are used while allocating resources, which would be freed automatically by kernel. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: stmpe: Add DT support in stmpe driver

2012-11-21 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Viresh, On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:01:55PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: From: Vipul Kumar Samar vipulkumar.sa...@st.com This patch adds support to probe stmpe devices via DT. Bindings are mentioned in binding document. Signed-off-by: Vipul Kumar Samar vipulkumar.sa...@st.com

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/7] MFD: ti_am335x_tscadc: DT support and TSC features addition

2012-11-21 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Rachna, On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:33:00AM +, Patil, Rachna wrote: Hi, This is just a gentle reminder of the patch set I had posted earlier viz. [PATCH RESEND 0/7] MFD: ti_am335x_tscadc: DT support and TSC features addition Can this patch set be pulled in if there are no review

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mfd: stmpe: Use devm_*() routines

2012-11-23 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Viresh, On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:40:29AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: This patch frees stmpe driver from tension of freeing resources :) devm_* derivatives of multiple routines are used while allocating resources, which would be freed automatically by kernel. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Documentation: Fix historical inconsistency in STMPE DT doc

2012-11-23 Thread Samuel Ortiz
, but the document was neglected. This patch aims to rectify that. Cc: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmpe.txt |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions

Re: [PATCH V1 2/3] mfd: stmpe-i2c: Move .driver structure fields inside {} in stmpe_i2c_driver

2012-11-26 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Viresh, On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:26:19AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: Currently, few fields in stmpe_i2c_driver are initialized as: .driver.owner = THIS_MODULE, Group them under {}, like: .driver = { .owner = THIS_MODULE, ... }, Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar

Re: [PATCH V1 1/3] mfd: stmpe: Arrange #include header files in alphabetical order

2012-11-26 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Viresh, On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:26:18AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: This helps managing them better and also reduces chances of adding an header file twice. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org --- drivers/mfd/stmpe-spi.c | 2 +- drivers/mfd/stmpe.c | 6 +++--- 2

Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] mfd: stmpe: Update DT support in stmpe driver

2012-11-30 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Viresh, Lee, On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:10:18PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: From: Vipul Kumar Samar vipulkumar.sa...@st.com This patch extends existing DT support for stmpe devices. This updates: - DT support from stmpe SPI and I2C drivers - missing header files in stmpe.c -

Re: [PATCH V7] mfd: stmpe: Update DT support for stmpe driver

2012-12-09 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Viresh, On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:29:37PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: From: Vipul Kumar Samar vipulkumar.sa...@st.com This patch extends existing DT support for stmpe devices. This updates: - missing header files in stmpe.c - stmpe_of_probe() with pwm, rotator and new bindings. -

Re: [PATCH 0/4] mfd/regulator: tps65090: add DT support and suspend/resume cleanups

2013-02-03 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Laxman, On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 02:59:37PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: The patch series add DT support on TPS65090 device. Also remove the suspend/resume implementation as it duplicates with irq_suspend/irq_resume(). Laxman Dewangan (4): mfd: tps65090: add DT support for tps65090

Re: [PATCH V2 4/6] mfd: tps6507x: add device-tree support.

2013-02-03 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Manish, On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 01:08:52PM +0530, Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish wrote: Add device tree based initialization support for TI's tps6507x mfd device. Signed-off-by: Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish manish...@ti.com --- Changes since V1: - updated subject line for commit.

Re: [PATCH 0/4] mfd/regulator: tps65090: add DT support and suspend/resume cleanups

2013-02-03 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Laxman, On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 03:19:31PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: Hi Laxman, On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 02:59:37PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: The patch series add DT support on TPS65090 device. Also remove the suspend/resume implementation as it duplicates with irq_suspend

Re: [PATCH 0/7] mfd: update on max8925 for DT support

2013-02-04 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Haojian, On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:05:09AM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote: Hi Samuel, Are they merged into your git tree? No, they're not. Qing sent several versions for many of the patches in this patchset: Could you please send a rebased patchset (on top of for-next) with the latest

Re: [PATCH 1/6] mfd: max8925: add irqdomain for dt

2013-02-05 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Haojian, On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:40:42PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote: From: Qing Xu qi...@marvell.com Add irqdomains for max8925's main irq, wrap irq register operations into irqdomain's map func. it is necessary for dt support. Also, add dt support for max8925 driver.

Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Add ChromeOS Embedded Controller support

2013-03-19 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Simon, On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:08:35PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote: The ChromeOS Embedded Controller (EC) is an Open Source EC implementation used on ARM and Intel Chromebooks. Current implementations use a Cortex-M3 connected on a bus (such as I2C, SPI, LPC) to the AP. A separate interrupt

Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Add ChromeOS Embedded Controller support

2013-03-19 Thread Samuel Ortiz
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:56:52AM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: Hi Simon, On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:08:35PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote: The ChromeOS Embedded Controller (EC) is an Open Source EC implementation used on ARM and Intel Chromebooks. Current implementations use a Cortex-M3

Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Add ChromeOS Embedded Controller support

2013-03-20 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Simon, On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:01:42PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Samuel, On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:56:52AM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: Hi Simon, On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:08:35PM -0800, Simon Glass

Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Add ChromeOS Embedded Controller support

2013-03-20 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Simon, On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:14:56AM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:01:42PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Samuel, On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:56:52AM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: Hi

Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: as3711: add OF support

2013-03-22 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Guennadi, On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:40:15PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: Hi all On Sat, 2 Mar 2013, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:57:44AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: Add device-tree bindings to the AS3711 regulator and backlight drivers.

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mfd: as3711: add OF support

2013-03-22 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Guennadi, On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 05:15:47PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: Add Flat Device Tree support to the AS3711 MFD driver. This patch just allows to bind the driver to I2C devices, instantiated from the DT. DT support for AS3711 cell drivers will be added in separate drivers.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: stmpe: DT: Enable no-irq mode configuration

2013-04-05 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Linus, On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 01:07:16PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: From: Gabriel Fernandez gabriel.fernan...@stericsson.com If there is no interrupt property into stmpe node then activate the no-irq mode by setting the irq value to -1. Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: stmpe: DT: Add stmpe-i2c dt alias to get id device

2013-04-05 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Linus, On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 01:07:26PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: From: Gabriel Fernandez gabriel.fernan...@stericsson.com This patch augments the STMP driver to read the device id from the stmpe-i2c dt alias if present. Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH v10 0/12] Palmas updates

2013-04-05 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Ian, On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:55:10PM +, Ian Lartey wrote: This patchset adds to the support for the Palmas series of PMIC chips. Some of the patches have previously been submitted individually. The DT bindings doc has been added first due to comments that it was missing. Patches

Re: [PATCH v10 03/12] mfd: palmas add variant and OTP detection

2013-04-05 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Ian, On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:55:13PM +, Ian Lartey wrote: @@ -278,20 +329,20 @@ static void palmas_dt_to_pdata(struct i2c_client *i2c, int ret; u32 prop; - ret = of_property_read_u32(node, ti,mux_pad1, prop); + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, ti,mux-pad1,

Re: [PATCH v4 04/14] mfd: Add Samsung PWM/timer master driver

2013-04-05 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Tomasz, On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:37:01PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: This patch adds master driver for PWM/timer block available on many Samsung SoCs providing clocksource and PWM output capabilities. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park

Re: [PATCH] mfd: Add device tree bindings for Arizona class devices

2013-04-08 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Mark, On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:38:48PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/arizona.txt | 62 drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c| 64

Re: [PATCH] mfd: Add device tree bindings for Arizona class devices

2013-04-08 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Mark, On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:38:48PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/arizona.txt | 62 drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c| 64

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] max77693: added device tree support

2013-04-08 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Andrzej, On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 04:36:16PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: max77693 mfd main device uses only wakeup field from max77693_platform_data. This field is mapped to wakeup-source property in device tree. Device tree bindings doc will be added in max77693-led patch.

Re: [PATCH v10 02/12] mfd: palmas: is_palmas_charger needed by multiple drivers

2013-04-08 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Ian, On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:55:12PM +, Ian Lartey wrote: is_palmas_charger checks for the presence of charging functionality in the device Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory g...@slimlogic.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ian Lartey i...@slimlogic.co.uk Acked-by: Laxman Dewangani

Re: [PATCH v10 0/12] Palmas updates

2013-04-08 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Graeme, On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: On 05/04/13 17:30, Samuel Ortiz wrote: Hi Ian, On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:55:10PM +, Ian Lartey wrote: This patchset adds to the support for the Palmas series of PMIC chips. Some of the patches have

Re: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: omap-usb-host: Device tree support for 3.10

2013-04-09 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Roger, On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:42:04PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote: Hi Samuel, I've rebased this now on top of 3.9-rc4. Please pull this into your next branch when appropriate. Thanks. The following changes since commit 8bb9660418e05bb1845ac1a2428444d78e322cc7: Linux 3.9-rc4

Re: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: omap-usb-host: Device tree support for 3.10

2013-04-09 Thread Samuel Ortiz
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:39:16AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: Samuel, You had the conflicts because a patch [*] was introduced and is not required since the reset logic is being removed from the driver. Anyways, I've rebased the 2 patches on top of mfd-next, so now it shouldn't matter.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: wm8994: Add device ID data to WM8994 OF device IDs

2013-04-18 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Mark, On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 06:11:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: We can actually read this back from the device but we use this when registered using standard I2C board data registration so make sure it's there for OF too. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] drivers: mfd: vexpress: add Serial Power Controller (SPC) support

2013-06-12 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Lorenzo, I don't particularily like this code, but I guess most of my dislike comes from the whole bridge interface API and how that forces you into implementing pretty much static code. A few nitpicks: On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:59:23AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: diff --git

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] drivers: mfd: Versatile Express SPC support

2013-06-12 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Lorenzo, On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:05:45AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: Hi Samuel, if nobody has objections I think this set is ready to get merged. As Nico mentioned in: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-June/173541.html since we would like to get it

Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: twl4030-power: Split from twl-core into a dedicated module

2013-06-17 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Florian, On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Florian Vaussard wrote: For now, the call to twl4030-power is hard-wired inside twl-core. To ease the future transition to DT, make twl4030-power as a separate module, like what is already done for twl4030-audio and others.

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: twl4030-power: Start transition to DT

2013-06-17 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Florian, On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:51:55PM +0200, Florian Vaussard wrote: int twl4030_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct twl4030_power_data *pdata = pdev-dev.platform_data; + struct device_node *node = pdev-dev.of_node; int err = 0; - int i; -

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/2] drivers: mfd: vexpress: add Serial Power Controller (SPC) support

2013-06-18 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Olof, On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:44:51AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 04:51:09PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: The TC2 versatile express core tile integrates a logic block that provides the interface between the dual cluster test-chip and the M3

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] drivers: mfd: Versatile Express SPC support

2013-06-18 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Pawell, On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:45:57AM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 01:13 +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: Now, about the driver itself, besides the really odd code design, the static variables all over the place, the nasty init hacks and the unneeded long function names

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: twl4030-power: Start DT conversion and updates

2013-06-19 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Florian, On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 03:17:55PM +0200, Florian Vaussard wrote: Hello, This series enables a partial DT support for twl4030-power. The missing part is the power management scripts, as the required binding should be defined first. It however enables the complete shutdown of

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] drivers: mfd: Versatile Express SPC support

2013-06-19 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Pawel, On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:29:42AM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 10:09 +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: Hi Pawell, Double l in the wrong place ;-) Apologies... If you feel strongly about it, I'm ready to split it into mfd_cells and move the gpio and leds code

Re: [PATCH] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032

2013-06-20 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Oleksandr, On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 03:24:02PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote: From: Graeme Gregory g...@slimlogic.co.uk The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to reference the TWL6032 class and

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] MFD: Palmas: Add TPS659038 PMIC support on Palmas

2013-06-20 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi, On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:27:46AM +0530, Keerthy wrote: From: J Keerthy j-keer...@ti.com The Patch series adds TPS659038 PMIC support in the palmas MFD and Regulator drivers. The TPS659038 has almost the same registers as of the earlier supported variants of PALMAS family such as the

Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] mfd: Palmas: Add TPS659038 PMIC support

2013-06-20 Thread Samuel Ortiz
insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) This one does not apply against mfd-next as I don't have the palmas.txt. For Grant to take this one: Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com If that creates conflicts (I already have a few palmas.c changes) then we'll have to find a way to fix them (Me taking

Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] MFD: Palmas: Add SMPS10_BOOST feature

2013-06-20 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi, On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:34:42AM +, J, KEERTHY wrote: -Original Message- From: J, KEERTHY Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:28 AM To: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org Cc: broo...@kernel.org; J, KEERTHY; ldewan...@nvidia.com; sa...@linux.intel.com;

Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] MFD: Palmas: Add SMPS10_BOOST feature

2013-06-20 Thread Samuel Ortiz
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 09:13:06AM +, J, KEERTHY wrote: Could you please pull this patch? I'm reverting this one for now as of_match_device is not define for !CONFIG_OF. So the of_match_device parts can come under #ifdef CONFIG_OF? Nevermind, you were just missing an of_device.h

Re: [PATCH 2/4] MFD: Palmas: Add TPS659038 PMIC support

2013-06-24 Thread Samuel Ortiz
detection, Vibrator, USB OTG are missing when compared to TWL6035. Signed-off-by: J Keerthy j-keer...@ti.com Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com --- drivers/mfd/palmas.c |5 + 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel

Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/1] drivers: mfd: Versatile Express SPC support

2013-07-17 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Lorenzo, On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:05:42PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: Hello, version v5 of VExpress SPC driver, please read on the changelog for major changes and explanations. The probing scheme is unchanged, since after trying the early platform devices approach it appeared

Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/1] drivers: mfd: Versatile Express SPC support

2013-07-17 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Pawel, On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:20:11PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 15:16 +0100, Nicolas Pitre wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Pawel Moll wrote: On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 13:33 +0100, Nicolas Pitre wrote: If this is really miscelaneous code that really doesn't fit

Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/1] drivers: mfd: Versatile Express SPC support

2013-07-17 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Nicolas, On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:29:02PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:57:55AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: The sanest location at this point might simply be drivers/platform/vexpress_spc.c or