Last night I made a comment about Clark Connect 2.0, I'd not used or got
under the bonnet of 2.1. 2.1 is a benchmark on usability, clarity of
coding, installation design and service configuration that SME can aim
for.
If you've not played with 2.1 I suggest you make time to do so.
It's
As to the distribution in question, one would need to examine the software
in more detail to verify compliance with the GPL.
As you can see here:
http://youresale.com/products/yes_license_agreement.php
they 1) inform their customers that the GPL applies to some included
software
Charlie Brady wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Richard Morrell wrote:
I am guilty of this - wholesale.
That's an interesting public admission.
Thats why I made it, its not an admission - SW doesn't breach the GPL,
what it does do is not clearly make available modifications. What
Just a quick comment to point out I was rather roundly trounced and then asked
to not discuss this anymore on this dev-list the very last time such a topic
came up.
I guess it is who makes a comment more than what is being said that
matters here.
Sigh.
Bob Finch
Freedom of speech is
IF you are looking for another product that works well and is VERY similar to
the above products you could look into clark-connect. It is rock solid AND
comforms to GPL completely.
Bob, I like what Clark Connect and their CEO stand for, he's a great guy
who I respect a lot, however the
Hey Ricard;
Thanxs for the very polite reply.
Well I was referring to 2.1 which has been out for almost a month now. It is a
good product and seems very solid to me. YMMV of course. I agree that 2.0 was
less than stellar, but the clark staff also was quick to point out that it
was an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 29 December 2003 07:05 pm, you wrote:
IF you are looking for another product that works well and is VERY
similar to the above products you could look into clark-connect. It is
rock solid AND comforms to GPL completely.
This sounds like you still do not
Dub Dublin wrote:
I'm going to take a shot at identifying a few things that we all agree
on (or at least that I think we *should* agree on), and one or two
that are not so consensual.
1. E-smith is a *server* distribution
No X, dev tools, etc. in the default distro, nor should there be. One
Peter Schubert wrote:
Hi List,
why we do not use sourceforge.net for e-smith/SME ?
Best
Peter Schubert
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe,
Charlie Brady wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree completely. Free software projects don't work that way.
On the contrary Charlie. Show me a major GPL project that doesn't have some
type of leadership in place.
My point was, and is, that such
10 matches
Mail list logo
