On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 03:01, Charlie Brady wrote:
If we take axonlinux as a project that has travelled this path already,
they built a new distro iso. To be very brief they essentially took
a disto (SGI XFS) and added all the e-smith rpms that the distro did not
include by default.
Damien Curtain [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And thats going well...
At least they tried. No one else has done better.
Im not sure how in touch people here are with kernel development,
because
I wouldnt be rushing to stick the latest and greatest 2.4 kernel on any
machine other than crash and
Damien Curtain [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And thats going well...
At least they tried. No one else has done better.
What has happened to axonlinux?
--
Regards
Brandon Friedman
Product Manager
Tech-Knowledgy Advantage
Ph: +27 (011) 486-0626
Fax: +27 (011) 486-0629
Cell: +27 (083) 408-7840
: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:44 AM
To: Devinfo@E-Smith. Org
Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SME on top of a distro [was Re:
[e-smith-devinfo] krud? + X]
Anecdotal Evidence (tm) says that the RedHat 2.4.9 (includes patches) is
the most reliable. (ie less panics _and_ page faults)
I think
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Brandon Friedman wrote:
Damien Curtain [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And thats going well...
At least they tried. No one else has done better.
What has happened to axonlinux?
Disappeared without a trace.
--
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lead
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Darrell May wrote:
If we take axonlinux as a project that has travelled this path already,
they built a new distro iso. To be very brief they essentially took a
disto (SGI XFS) and added all the e-smith rpms that the distro did not
include by default. After that
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Charlie Brady wrote:
So you are suggesting a project fork. That's a lot of work, and fragments
the community. So you should have very good justification for proposing
is.
Sorry - for proposing it.
To put it another way, what's wrong with this scenario?
I don't like
Just to put in my $0.02 worth (heavily over-valued actually),
I've been happy with the direction so far.
opinion
I have always seen this server as the Swiss Army Buzzsaw of Linux
distributions, and really enjoy the ability to do the add, subtract,
modify, delete routine for any and all
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So you are suggesting a project fork. That's a lot of work, and
fragments
the community. So you should have very good justification for proposing
is.
Well it is only a project fork if Mitel does not join in and follow along
with the community ;-
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Darrell May wrote:
Comments have been mentioned that 2.4 kernel has limitations. So what.
Isn't that what a development project is all about? I am not talking about
a production release here. I'm talking a bleeding edge development release.
We've been hoping to get
sufficient hours to it. Why should Mitel's owners fund this
development, if they don't see it as a pressing business need?
This topic must be on Mitel's roadmap? Mitel can't possible hope to
stick with the 2.2 kernel for the long term. Correct me if I'm wrong
Darrell, but it appears that
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Greg Zartman wrote:
sufficient hours to it. Why should Mitel's owners fund this
development, if they don't see it as a pressing business need?
This topic must be on Mitel's roadmap? Mitel can't possible hope to
stick with the 2.2 kernel for the long term.
Yes,
Hey Gang;
Time for me to speak up I guess. I think the idea of creating a list of
wanted and needed features and capabilities of the next releases IS part of
what a developers mailing list should be about. I also feel that Mitel and
its representatives should support this affirmatively, even
My only idea. ( dont have many)
A distro that at install time, asks what bits you want. As example we
have a ESSG box behind a firewall/gateway so don't need masq. Also same for
appletalk protocol. Dial up same.
Karl
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Karl Ponsonby wrote:
My only idea. ( dont have many)
A distro that at install time, asks what bits you want. As example we
have a ESSG box behind a firewall/gateway so don't need masq.
This choice you get when you choose serveronly or servergateway (at
initial boot
15 matches
Mail list logo
