Quoting Greg Zartman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
silly Question is anybody talking to http://free-eos.org/ about joining
efforts?
Charlie pointed these guys out last week. The biggest issue I see is
the language barrier. ;o)
Greg
This really is a non issue. I have 21 translators who worked
Thanks what I understand. We all may not have 19 GPL projects under our
belts, but I think most would be impressed with the collective resumes
of those working on the project over at contribs.org. We can go back
and forth all day about this kind of stuff, yet it gets us no-where.
No flames intended... I will say that I have alot of personal interest
in this community as I've been involved with it for several years. I
like SME and I like working with these people.
Cool I've been using it as long as you and I knew the likes of Dan York
way way way E-Smith even
It is based on RH7.3 with proprietary and GPL Perl mods. I say proprietary
as there are more than a few GPL vagries.
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Greg Zartman wrote:
My subject asks the question. I was under the impression that SME 6 was
based on RH8, but the kernel looks like it comes from RH
(apologies for top posting)
There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with the base we have at all. Remember
Linux is Linux forget the RedHat issues its a non starter - just think
like engineers.
For those that want to realise why this isnt a major issue let me explain.
Four years ago at VA Linux
Guys, I have seen enough of this to last a lifetime from this reflector.
Please refrain from putting others down. There is *NO* need to say things
like ...you havent the skills nor the time, nor the awareness of whats
needed... (sic) , even if you are convinced you are right. It is in
For the last few years I've used OpenH323 on VPN'd connections between
sites, with IP Phones and users with Gnomemeeting and OhPhone. I've always
set up gatekeepers up on internal machines with Procomm VoIP phones
looking to that as its gatekeeper.
I'd love to have OpenH323 as a core package
Cheers Charlie I did use groups.google for 35 mins and came up with
absolutely nothing :)
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Dick Morrell wrote:
I'd love to have OpenH323 as a core package on GPL releases of SME. It's
not that hard to do but it can
I apologised to Dan offlist. I had a polite PRIVATE discussion with Greg,
and Dan chose to post back to the list. I dislike being slapped down to
size as I don't need it. I have apologised off list to Dan and I am
following that through here.
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Greg Zartman wrote:
Dan