to the RPM) is available at the following URL:
http://www.robert2.dds.nl/howtos/apsfilter-howto.html
Regards,
Robert van den Aker
--
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL
.
The HOWTO (with a link to the RPM) is available at the following URL:
http://www.robert2.dds.nl/howtos/apsfilter-howto.html
Regards,
Robert van den Aker
--
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered
An unofficial port of SME 5.1.2 to the Alpha (aka DEC Alpha, Compaq
Alpha, AXP) architecture is available now in my contrib area (thanks
to Mitel for hosting it!). Please refer to the following webpage for
further details (also linked from the 'Contributed HOWTO' page):
,
Robert
Jan van Haarst wrote:
On 4 Jun 2002 at 21:08, Robert van den Aker wrote:
An unofficial port of SME 5.1.2 to the Alpha (aka DEC Alpha, Compaq
Alpha, AXP) architecture is available now in my contrib area (thanks
to Mitel for hosting it!). Please refer to the following webpage
At 09:52 -0400 05-06-2002, Tony Clayton wrote:
Looks like Red Hat might have future plans for PPC:
http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/0203/11.redhat.php
Tony et alii,
RedHat are already in the PPC market. In fact, they have an official
RedHat 7.1 release for PPC. It's just not for Apples (or
in the
iso. Any changes I made were made through patches to the original
sources, or otherwise clearly commented and traceable.
Regards,
Robert
Jan van Haarst wrote:
On 4 Jun 2002 at 21:08, Robert van den Aker wrote:
An unofficial port of SME 5.1.2 to the Alpha (aka DEC
Further to the discussion on (samba) build host configuration, I have
a question about kernel headers. I've been using 2.4 kernel headers
with no apparent problems on my build host (RedHat 7.1 w/ 2.2.19
kernel), but wondered how safe it is to do that. I assumed it would
be safe to use 2.4
The kernel-source RPM contains the headers, but a separate
kernel-headers RPM is a build requirement for a lot of packages. So,
which kernel-headers RPM is installed on Mitel's build host(s) and
where did you get it? To the best of my knowledge RedHat never
provided
I'm sorry, what I meant to ask was if Mitel (but I'm interested to
hear what others did) built their own kernel-headers RPM from the
kernel source, given the fact that, to the best of my knowledge,
RedHat never provided a kernel-headers RPM for 2.2.19-7.0.8 (probably
because standard RedHat
While we're on the subject of tcpserver and mailfront, I'd like to
add that I've had limited success with them on the Alpha.
tcpserver/mailfront/qmail would relay mail from the localhost only
(tested with pine and imp). Mailfront would also give a greeting when
I ran mconnect from the
Dear Alphaphiles,
I'm sure it's not as eagerly awaited as SME 5.6 for x86, and the
announcement is a bit premature, because some final testing remains
to be done, but I'd like to inform anyone interested in the
unofficial Alpha port of SME that I'm currently running what I
believe will be the
At 16:38 -0500 20-11-2002, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Robert van den Aker wrote:
However, tcpserver/mailfront/qmail would not relay mail from hosts on
the network. I could not connect to the smtp service when running
mconnect from a host on the internal network. I _was_ able
At 19:51 -0500 20-11-2002, Rich Lafferty wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:31:35PM +0100, Robert van den Aker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most surprising packages in this set are probably
obtuse-smtpd-qmail and e-smith-obtuse-smtpd. I had to revert
to using obtuse-smtpd because mailfront
At 19:40 -0500 10-01-2003, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Nathan Price wrote:
Thanks for the info about PreReq and Requires. But, more on the patch
files.
Make a patch file containing your changes:
diff -ruN BUILD/e-smith-pkg-0.3-{3,4} \
Dear Alphaphiles,
Looks like my preannouncement in November was a bit premature, but my
unofficial and unsupported port of SME 5.5 to the Alpha (aka DEC Alpha,
Compaq Alpha, AXP) architecture is now ready to be released.
I want to thank Chaloner Hale for all the time and effort he put in to
Dear PostScript-printing friends,
I have updated my apsfilter-HOWTO for SME 5.6 and packaged the latest
apsfilter into an RPM. For those unfamiliar with apsfilter, apsfilter and
ghostscript will let you print text, PDF and PostScript to
{non-,}PostScript printers with a simple 'lpr' command. It
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Michiel Blotwijk wrote:
Hi there,
What is the best way to launch a script when your IP address changes? I
could run a cron-job to test for a new IP, but I guess there is a
cleaner way.
regards,
Michiel
You can put your script in the ip-change event. That's what
NT/2k/XP, which may come in handy for printing to
filtering queues (for page accounting, quotas, etc.).
Regards,
Robert van den Aker
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Dan Brown wrote:
From: Robert van den Aker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The source RPMS can be found at
http://www.contribs.org/contribs/rvandenaker/beta/e-smith-cups/SRPMS
/ (please grab the latest). Once we have x86 binaries, I can upload
a new
Built
Dear all,
Updated e-smith-cups, cups, and hpijs packages for Alpha and x86 (thanks
again, Dan) are in my contrib directory at
http://www.contribs.org/contribs/rvandenaker/beta/e-smith-cups/. If you're
upgrading from a previous version, download the updated packages, install
them all in one go,
I've had two reports from users of my e-smith-cups contrib about
authorization problems when printing to samba shares. One user was trying
to print from a Windows 2000 host, the other from a Windows XP host. My
own limited testing from a Windows 98 host had not shown any such
problems. The samba
I have the following template fragments:
/etc/e-smith/templates/etc/atalk/papd.conf/00ReadPrintersConf
{
@printers = ();
open (RD, /etc/cups/printers.conf)
|| warn Cannot open input file /etc/cups/printers.conf: $!\n;
while (RD)
{
if (/^(Default)?Printer ([\w\-]+)/)
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 23/09/03 Robert van den Aker did say:
But if I run atalk-conf, which contains
foreach (qw(
...
papd.conf
...
))
{
esmith::util::processTemplate ({
...
TEMPLATE_PATH = /etc/atalk
I filed this as a bug with [EMAIL PROTECTED] as suggested on one of the
user forums, but haven't had a response (from a human).
The srpm for proftpd-1.2.8p-es1 is missing from the 5.6 and 6.0b3 updates
directories.
The srpm for e-smith-proftpd-1.8.0-02 is missing from the 5.6 updates
directory.
Alphaphiles,
I finally got around to building proftpd errata packages for SME/Alpha
5.5. You can find them in the usual location.
Robert
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to
Steven Curren reported a rather interesting bug against my cups-1.1.19
build, which is a RawHide build with minor modifications. Upgrading the
cups-1.1.19 package over an existing LPRng package, which is possible
because the cups package Obsoletes the LPRng package and is the method
recommended in
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Robert van den Aker wrote:
I believe it should be possible to 'rpm -U' cups over LPRng properly if
the cups package didn't Provide LPRng, which it does to meet a
redhat-printerconf dependency.
Why would you need or want
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Robert van den Aker wrote:
I'm not using or requiring redhat-printerconf. But redhat-printerconf
requires LPRng, which is why the Red Hat packager for cups decided to make
the cups package provide LPRng.
Odd, I looked it up on rpmfind.net and recent versions of
redhat
Hi,
I was wondering if someone on this list might have the time, skill and
inclination to translate two rather short lexicon files from my
e-smith-cups contrib from English to Spanish. It would be much
appreciated.
The lexicon files are here:
http://www.robert2.dds.nl/test/printers_en-us.txt
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Robert van den Aker wrote:
I was wondering if someone on this list might have the time, skill and
inclination to translate two rather short lexicon files from my
e-smith-cups contrib from English to Spanish. It would be much
appreciated.
Jaime Nebrera Herrera has kindly
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:30:53PM -0700, Jeff Coleman wrote:
We will setup a list shortly on contribs.org to discuss the future and
potential of the e-smith release.
To echo Charlie's question: what's wrong with this list?
Cheers,
Robert
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 12:57:07PM -0800, Greg Zartman wrote:
To echo Charlie's question: what's wrong with this list?
Well, if Mitel is throwing in the towel (so to speak), then this list
will eventually go away. Further, this discussion has nothing to do
with Mitel. It is a community
The e-smith-cups package has been updated to work with SME 6.0b3. Special
thanks to:
- Peter Schubert for SME 6 compatibility testing and fixes,
- Jaime Nebrera Herrera for the Spanish translation,
- Fabien Illide for the French translation,
- Charlie Brady for the suggestion to use standard SME
to download myself.
Kind regards,
Robert van den Aker
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, TekUnsupported wrote:
[snip] with the possibility of E-smith being ported to Debian [...], has
anybody considered re-initiating E-smith support on platforms such as
Sparc or Alpha since the Debian distros are still rather loyal to the
respective aforementioned
35 matches
Mail list logo
