the actual changes I made in a document or 10 and post it
here... and study just what I have to do to crank out an RPM or 10 :)
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Rowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: December 21, 2000 4:19 PM
To: Charlie Brady
Cc: Scott Duncan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [e
Easy! remove the symlinks in runlevel 3 (/etc/rc.d/rc3.d) and there you have
it! One semi-functional E-Smith server! :)
Which begs the questionwhat is there left for e-smith to do? If it's
sharing and forwarding you need, use a product like Freesco. E-Smith is a
masterpiece of management in
builds of e-smith when I try stuff like this, but it's a gap that
needs to be filled and e-smith is worth the effort.
Please bear in mind that Scott Duncan modifications are not for the faint of
heart and are only for the EXTREMELY daring.
People who are merely daring should download the e-smith Beta
OOPS! You're right. I was thinking of my hacked-up versionI am playing
with an X-interface for e-smithdon't get your hopes up thoit's never
worked right :)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Doerner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 8, 2001 6:23 AM
To: Scott Duncan
So Near Yet So Far...
I did a test of the RPM mentioned below and it is pretty cool!
Now this may not apply to everyone; but those who have NT servers on their
networks (especially when said servers act as primary domain controllers)
will find that installing this module will kill the
This looked neat, so I tried it...
gzip reports an error
It says it's not a valid gzip file.
Is the server copy corrupt?
-Original Message-
From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: November 3, 2001 4:45 PM
To: e-smith-devinfo
Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] serverstatus.php3
Samba 207 is in es 412.. Samba 222 is the lanman5 protocol with LOTS of
changes to get around microsoft sabotage...
Comparing the 2 revisions is apples and oranges...
TRY it before you dismiss it please
- Original Message -
From: Des Dougan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott Duncan [EMAIL
Samba 207 is in es 412.. Samba 222 is the lanman5 protocol with LOTS of
changes to get around microsoft sabotage...
Comparing the 2 revisions is apples and oranges...
TRY it before you dismiss it please
- Original Message -
From: Scott Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
This is an interesting one...
The only time I've ever seen the symptoms you are describing was when a
client had a machine named the same as a user ID on the network (i.e.: SMB
UserID=sara and a workstation NetBIOS name called SARA).
While you can actually DO this with a true NT domain, SAMBA
This is a simple one :)
In your 90e-smithAccess10primary and your 90e-smithAccess40ibays look for a
filesmatch statement...and add any extension you like, and make sure it
appears in BOTH areas... If you ACTIVATE the PHP functionality in an iBay
you will need to add the filesmatch to that one...
I WAS an E-Smith partner, and the Mitel version of the agreement was NOT
what I signed up for. I wouldn't sign the new agreement because of some of
the clauses... PLUS I don't like having a contract changed on a whim.
The motivation for becoming a partner? Gordon's Woe is us...we're so
exploited
discussed, DON'T RAISE THEM IN THE FIRST
PLACE!
now just answer the guy's question!
sheesh
- Original Message -
From: Dan York [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tom Achtenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Jeff Coleman'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Gordon Rowell' [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
- Original Message -
From: Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] 5.1 RC or Gold?
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Scott Duncan wrote:
now just answer the guy's question
they will be live again... you said so yourself.
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 24, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Scott Duncan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Development planning (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] 5.1 RC or Gold?)
On Thu, 24 Jan
This is my bastardized template for access to Ibays. It deny's access to any
.inc or config files and forces a challenge for the IBay password for any
file/folder called admin. I have found this covers most CMS security
holes. Ignore the opnx references as this is just internal stuff on our
HUGE difference...
MPN has access level controls, unfortunately all the mods don't quite work
and is not as stable as Rogue(Postnuke) or PHPNUKE.
I notice a lot of STRANGE stuff whenever I do ANY playing with it.
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To: Scott Duncan
Subject:RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Postnuke Security
I'd have to take issue with the stability statement, and about the mods,
other than for perhaps myegallery. It may not handle too much playing
with, but does exactly as advertised: Secure, Integrated and STABLE. :-)
IMHO
PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 16, 2002 9:22 PM
To: Scott Duncan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Postnuke Security
Who, me? :-)
Yes I am, and what you say below about PAM rings true. I would like to
say though that although exploits are always possible, NONE
None taken... The documentation folks might be a bit miffed though :P
-Original Message-
From: little bark, BIG BYTE!! [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 17, 2002 6:08 PM
To: Scott Duncan
Cc: 'Brandon Friedman'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [e-smith-devinfo
Been there... done that
Had some MAJOR success, but it started to look like I was going to OWN it if
I kept it up...
So I didn't. This was in the E-smith 4.12 days. I embarked on it because
Anaconda is SUCH an obscufated peice of crap with WAY too many points of
failure. I opted to do a PGI
20 matches
Mail list logo
