[freenet-dev] Out of memory.

2002-09-05 Thread Oskar Sandberg
Some component is leaking memory. I have been suspecting that for some time. What we need is for somebody to run some heap profiles on long running nodes. See: http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-2001/jw-1207-hprof.html On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:05:42PM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote: > >

[freenet-dev] DSB after "Upstream node sent bad data!"

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/cbe7bd07/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] 0.4 Release

2002-09-05 Thread Travis Bemann
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:14:25PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:06:48PM -0700, Reuben Balik wrote: > > I was looking at the Freenet project page and I > > noticed that there hasn't been a release until > > December. Since the latest build seems pretty stable > > (I

[freenet-dev] DSB after "Upstream node sent bad data!"

2002-09-05 Thread Greg Wooledge
L: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/de09fe03/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Anyone experiencing out-of-memory errors?

2002-09-05 Thread Benjamin Coates
>From Ian Clarke >I just experienced an out-of-memory error - could people check their >recently upgraded nodes and make sure that memory usage is sane? > >Perhaps time for another round of heap-dumps. My new build 498 node runs out of a default-sized heap within hours, and doing -Xmx256m fills

[freenet-dev] Re: Anyone experiencing out-of-memory errors?

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/3295a528/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] 0.4 Release

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/8a0fcb96/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] 0.4 Release

2002-09-05 Thread Reuben Balik
I was looking at the Freenet project page and I noticed that there hasn't been a release until December. Since the latest build seems pretty stable (I haven't had a problem) and has a nice interface (although I dislike the Internet Explorer Sucks message; couldn't you just put a small warning on

[freenet-dev] Re: Anyone experiencing out-of-memory errors?

2002-09-05 Thread Simon G
Sorry about the previous message -somebodies SW being too clever and guessing what I wanted... I've been getting out of memory crashes too: I've also noticed that the ticker contents display is filling up with megabytes of: freenet.node.states.announcing.Announcing$ScheduleAnnouncing at

[freenet-dev] Javadocs

2002-09-05 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:52:46PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 11:19:39PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > For those too lazy to type "ant javadoc", here are the current Freenet > > javadocs: > > > > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/~ian/freenet_javadocs/api/ > > > >

[freenet-dev] Re: Anyone experiencing out-of-memory errors?

2002-09-05 Thread Simon G
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/0656dae4/attachment.html>

[freenet-dev] Anyone experiencing out-of-memory errors?

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/cb09fc58/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Out of memory.

2002-09-05 Thread Dan Merillat
Either we're reporting it now, or something is using a cubic fuckton more RAM. I've got the VM limit set at 96 meg, and I'm sorry, but that's "More Then Enough" to do the job. I've only got a half gig on this box, so running to 128meg is going to start hurting (especially if there's a

[freenet-dev] FEC and Fishtools. oops *^_^*

2002-09-05 Thread fish
My bad, that's what I get for testing on small files ^_^. (when your files are only 1meg, you don't hit hex, and hence, you know, it's all good then :-p.). sorry! Anyhow, looking at GJ's patch, I understand what I did that was incompatable now, so should I fix it to be compatable with the old

[freenet-dev] Out of memory.

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
zer Inc. http://www.uprizer.com/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/4caff113/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Depreciating Makefile

2002-09-05 Thread Timm Murray
<> > The problem with make is javac has a stupid startup time, so is best called > with 30+ files at > once. Make likes to call things sequentially. ant is designed to call javac > once with > all the filenames. That's why I use Jikes :) ___ devl

[freenet-dev] Javadocs

2002-09-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
urceforge.net Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Looking for $coding (I'm cheap) -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/e9c79cf1/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Upping the build

2002-09-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
er. Looking for $coding (I'm cheap) -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/3d69a77f/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] IE and the anonymity filter... big trouble

2002-09-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
nt was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/1ccd1a24/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Anyone experiencing out-of-memory errors?

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/c023f705/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] How to deal with developer turnover (Was: Re: Javadocs

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/49e5ec17/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Upping the build

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
2 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/be5c8dab/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] FEC and Fishtools. oops *^_^*

2002-09-05 Thread Dan Merillat
fish writes: > > My bad, that's what I get for testing on small files ^_^. (when your > files are only 1meg, you don't hit hex, and hence, you know, it's all good > then :-p.). sorry! > > Anyhow, looking at GJ's patch, I understand what I did that was > incompatable now, so should I fix it to

[freenet-dev] Fproxy changes

2002-09-05 Thread Dan Merillat
Ian Clarke writes: > > --S1BNGpv0yoYahz37 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Well, in theory - yes, in practice, it ain't so easy. > > The NodeInfoServlet resides on port 8890, that is the thing that

[freenet-dev] IE and the anonymity filter... big trouble

2002-09-05 Thread Dan Merillat
Ian Clarke writes: > > --iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Does this mean that the "view page source" link that comes up when the=20 > anonymity doesn't work in IE? Yes. And the safest

[freenet-dev] HTML/CSS parser?

2002-09-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
for $coding (I'm cheap) -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/79629e3e/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Fixing spurious filter warnings

2002-09-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
achment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020905/ea4e6de5/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Depreciating Makefile

2002-09-05 Thread Dan Merillat
Matthew Toseland writes: > > --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:59:50AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > I would like to encourage those still using the Makefile

[freenet-dev] Upping the build

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
Just a rule of thumb - I suggest that we avoid upping the build number more than once a week. Ian. -- Ian Clarkeian at freenetproject.org Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Projecthttp://freenetproject.org/ Chief Technology Officer, Uprizer Inc.

[freenet-dev] Is anyone alive

2002-09-05 Thread Dan Merillat
Ian Clarke writes: > > --gKMricLos+KVdGMg > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Christ, no matter what horrible mutilations of the code I wilfully admit=20 > on this mailing list, I still fail to provoke a

[freenet-dev] Killing the datastore bug

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 11:12:03PM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote: > Next time my datastore tosses its cookies what should I do? What > information do you need? I'd like to help however possible. I don't think there is much that can be done by the general public, I suspect that diagnosing the problem

[freenet-dev] Javadocs

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
For those too lazy to type "ant javadoc", here are the current Freenet javadocs: http://hawk.freenetproject.org/~ian/freenet_javadocs/api/ These are particularly useful for figuring out how stuff like the filesystem implementation (hint hint) work. Ian. -- Ian Clarke

[freenet-dev] Killing the datastore bug

2002-09-05 Thread Tracy R Reed
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 06:52:40PM -0700, Ian Clarke spake thusly: > It his high-time we took concerted action to kill the datastore bug. Glory glory hallelujah! Next time my datastore tosses its cookies what should I do? What information do you need? I'd like to help however possible. > -

[freenet-dev] Upping the build

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
Just a rule of thumb - I suggest that we avoid upping the build number more than once a week. Ian. -- Ian Clarke[EMAIL PROTECTED] Founder Coordinator, The Freenet Projecthttp://freenetproject.org/ Chief Technology Officer, Uprizer Inc.

Re: [freenet-dev] Fproxy changes

2002-09-05 Thread Dan Merillat
Ian Clarke writes: --S1BNGpv0yoYahz37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, in theory - yes, in practice, it ain't so easy. The NodeInfoServlet resides on port 8890, that is the thing that draws the =

Re: [freenet-dev] Upping the build

2002-09-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 11:44:52PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: Just a rule of thumb - I suggest that we avoid upping the build number more than once a week. I suggest we only up the version number when there is a change to the externally (to the network) visible behaviour of the node, and we do

Re: [freenet-dev] IE and the anonymity filter... big trouble

2002-09-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 03:02:06AM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote: Ian Clarke writes: --iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does this mean that the view page source link that comes up

Re: [freenet-dev] Depreciating Makefile

2002-09-05 Thread Timm Murray
The problem with make is javac has a stupid startup time, so is best called with 30+ files at once. Make likes to call things sequentially. ant is designed to call javac once with all the filenames. That's why I use Jikes :) ___ devl mailing

Re: [freenet-dev] Javadocs

2002-09-05 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:52:46PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 11:19:39PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: For those too lazy to type ant javadoc, here are the current Freenet javadocs: http://hawk.freenetproject.org/~ian/freenet_javadocs/api/ These are

Re: [freenet-dev] Upping the build

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:51:47PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 11:44:52PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: Just a rule of thumb - I suggest that we avoid upping the build number more than once a week. I suggest we only up the version number when there is a change to the

Re: [freenet-dev] Out of memory.

2002-09-05 Thread Oskar Sandberg
Some component is leaking memory. I have been suspecting that for some time. What we need is for somebody to run some heap profiles on long running nodes. See: http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-2001/jw-1207-hprof.html On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:05:42PM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:

Re: [freenet-dev] Out of memory.

2002-09-05 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:54:07PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: So - question - do OutputStreams/Writers to Servlets (as obtained from HttpServletResponse objects) need to be closed before the doGet() method of the servlet terminates? resp.flushBuffer() should be called. -- Oskar Sandberg

RE: [freenet-dev] Anyone experiencing out-of-memory errors?

2002-09-05 Thread Benjamin Coates
From Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] I just experienced an out-of-memory error - could people check their recently upgraded nodes and make sure that memory usage is sane? Perhaps time for another round of heap-dumps. My new build 498 node runs out of a default-sized heap within hours, and doing

Re: [freenet-dev] Anyone experiencing out-of-memory errors?

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:49:59PM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote: My new build 498 node runs out of a default-sized heap within hours, and doing -Xmx256m fills up and starts thrashing on my 128MB system. how do you get a heap dump? Something like this: java

[freenet-dev] Re: Anyone experiencing out-of-memory errors?

2002-09-05 Thread Simon G
I've been getting out of memory crashes too: I've also noticed that the ticker contents displayis filling up with megabytes of: freenet.node.states.announcing.Announcing$ScheduleAnnouncing@e90e23 could this have something to do with it ? The log looks like this: Snip Sep 5, 2002 2:26:47 AM

[freenet-dev] Re: Anyone experiencing out-of-memory errors?

2002-09-05 Thread Simon G
Sorry about the previous message -somebodies SW being too clever and guessing what I wanted... I've been getting out of memory crashes too: I've also noticed that the ticker contents display is filling up with megabytes of: freenet.node.states.announcing.Announcing$ScheduleAnnouncing@959352

[freenet-dev] 0.4 Release

2002-09-05 Thread Reuben Balik
I was looking at the Freenet project page and I noticed that there hasn't been a release until December. Since the latest build seems pretty stable (I haven't had a problem) and has a nice interface (although I dislike the Internet Explorer Sucks message; couldn't you just put a small warning on

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.4 Release

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:06:48PM -0700, Reuben Balik wrote: I was looking at the Freenet project page and I noticed that there hasn't been a release until December. Since the latest build seems pretty stable (I haven't had a problem) and has a nice interface (although I dislike the

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Anyone experiencing out-of-memory errors?

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:53:19PM -0700, Simon G wrote: I've been getting out of memory crashes too: I've also noticed that the ticker contents display is filling up with megabytes of: freenet.node.states.announcing.Announcing$ScheduleAnnouncing@959352 This could easily be the problem as I

[freenet-dev] DSB after Upstream node sent bad data!

2002-09-05 Thread Greg Wooledge
05-Sep-02 6:37:37 PM (freenet.node.Node, main): Starting interfaces.. 05-Sep-02 7:59:05 PM (freenet.client.http.FproxyServlet, QThread-321: freenet.interfaces.LocalInterface$ConnectionShell@1531d48 (time: 1031270280)): Error sending data to browser: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe 05-Sep-02

Re: [freenet-dev] DSB after Upstream node sent bad data!

2002-09-05 Thread Andrew Rodland
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:38:56 -0400 Greg Wooledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [DSB occuring right after Upstream node sent bad data!] I've seen this too, but I've also seen the bad data message without any obvious DSB consequences. I've also gotten messages around that time about unable to send

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.4 Release

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 09:23:58PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: But still, we should be extremely firm in warning users about the use of M$IE and the insecurity of it. I personally think that even ALLOWING users to view fproxy beyond a rejection page with links to other browsers one can get

Re: [freenet-dev] DSB after Upstream node sent bad data!

2002-09-05 Thread Ian Clarke
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:38:56PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: (The rumors of memory leaks in the newest builds scare me, especially since I came back this afternoon to find my node using 253 out of 256 MB allocated memory, so I reverted.) Matthew checked in a potential fix for these memory

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.4 Release

2002-09-05 Thread Travis Bemann
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 10:21:48PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 09:23:58PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: But still, we should be extremely firm in warning users about the use of M$IE and the insecurity of it. I personally think that even ALLOWING users to view fproxy