On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:20:49AM +1000, fish wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> > Not at all, it just means that they can't insert with FProxy, I honestly
> > doubt many people were actually using FProxy for inserting stuff (more
> > likely they will use fcptools, freeweb,
Robert Bihlmeyer writes:
> Gianni Johansson writes:
>
> > C. Within a segment all data blocks must be the same size and all
> > check blocks must be the same size. The check block and data block
> > sizes are not required to be the same however. Smaller trailing
> > blocks must be zero padded
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:42:37PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Marco A. Calamari wrote:
> > None follow Ian's call for opinion about the
> > fproxy insertion capability removal.
> >
> > My opinion about it is that was a bad(TM) idea.
> >
> > I canno
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> It's good to make the distinction because if you manage to get all the data
> blocks you don't need to decode at all.
bob the angry flower says "wrong,m wrong, wrong ,wrong, where did you
learn that??! wrong!!!" :-p. Seriously, this is a very bad
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Not at all, it just means that they can't insert with FProxy, I honestly
> doubt many people were actually using FProxy for inserting stuff (more
> likely they will use fcptools, freeweb, or frost).
You'd be surprised, actully, at how many people were u
