[freenet-dev] freenet.conf lines for new FCP FEC

2002-09-14 Thread Gianni Johansson
I will evenutally make this work automatically, for now there are also a few lines you need in your freenet.conf: FECInstanceCacheSize=1 FECTempDir= FEC.Encoders.0.class=OnionFECEncoder FEC.Decoders.0.class=OnionFECDecoder ___ devl mailing list devl

[freenet-dev] FCP FEC checked in

2002-09-14 Thread Gianni Johansson
To try it out: 0) grab latest CVS 1) use http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/fcp-fec-freenet-ext.jar Instead of freenet-ext.jar 2) grab this python test script http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/freenet/Contrib/gj/TEST_FCP.py (and also the modules subdir). This isn't final. i.e. I

[freenet-dev] FEC method used on usenet

2002-09-14 Thread Michael Wiktowy
Just for your information. I ran across this paper on implementing Reed Soloman Algorithm for Parity Volumes. This is the way that most split file error correction is done in large usenet postings. RAR something and then generate a series of PAR files. If it is similar or the same as what

[freenet-dev] FCP FEC Proposal -- in message body

2002-09-14 Thread fish
On 13 Sep 2002, Edgar Friendly wrote: > > The Metadata spec should probably list the known values for this > > field, and give links to further documentation. A genuine registry for > > these may be needed, but I doubt that there will be more than 3 > > algorithms used in general ... > > > I

[freenet-dev] Fproxy insert

2002-09-14 Thread fish
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Travis Bemann wrote: > > However, you were never able to insert a *site* by fproxy. This would be > > a useful feature, no? :) > > The thing is that fproxy could NEVER actually insert whole sites into > Freenet, and because site insertion is necessary to actually >

[freenet-dev] FCP FEC Proposal -- in message body

2002-09-14 Thread Edgar Friendly
fish writes: > Not to be blunt, but last I checked, and correct me if I'm wrong, freenet > is written in java, and therefore platforms on which you cannot either > compile java source, or execute java bytecode, are already orphaned. > clients don't have to run on the same architectures the

[freenet-dev] Fproxy insert

2002-09-14 Thread Travis Bemann
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:20:49AM +1000, fish wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > Not at all, it just means that they can't insert with FProxy, I honestly > > doubt many people were actually using FProxy for inserting stuff (more > > likely they will use fcptools, freeweb,