-- next part --
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Philip Bych <pot...@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] freenet
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:46:46 +0100
Size: 4747
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604
f the basic hosting cost, so $18.95/mo.
If resource usage is a problem, we could bump it up (on the fly) to 1GB when we
expect a slashdot, and pull it back down before the month ends. During that
month the cost would be about what we pay for emu now - or rather, our half of
what is paid for emu (
g problem...
>
> Ian.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/a055a9d5/attachment.pgp>
ownloads, whether it would be enough for the wiki and the bug
tracker as well is uncertain.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/4c74055e/attachment.pgp>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
> You should seriously consider working with infinity0, his searching plugin
> will provide distributed indexing.
good neews :)
> Why are you splitting the files up? Are you assuming that the key changes
> every time for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
> SSKs are 1KB and have rather high overheads. You need to insert a bunch of
> CHKs under the SSK, and to make that safe you need the CHK data to be
> encrypted. But also you need it for security, because *the SSK is
>
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From:?Philip Bych
> To:?Matthew Toseland
> Date:?Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:46:46 +0100
> Subject:?Re: [freenet-support] freenet
> thanks but i have sorted the problem
> it was the java update
> ?i
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/5aa141a9/attachment.pgp>
on this already!
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/8e772
rent bug tracker (jira, trac etc), we have importing issues but it
might be managed.
We would still use berlios for mailing lists.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/8f1fc7b3/attachment.pgp>
digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/19a1418a/attachment.pgp>
gned message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/6bdcaf6a/attachment.pgp>
ons system? That could cost us
a significant amount of money...
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pi
If you really consider sf.net, someone should analyse what they
provide. And you should clearly
state what you need. The whole discussion is based on assumptions and stuff.
Fyi: sf.net has an own donation system, but you don't have to use it.
The Frost project directly
links to paypal on its
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> Nextgens has suggested Google Web Apps more than once. This is a paid service
> but with a generous free quota. The free quota will become rather less
> generous on June 22nd. Hopefully we will get the release out before then, but
> we
ive hash (sha256) as identifier for archive manager is an
> alternative,
> this would allow matadata inclusion (container insert with
> reportMatadataOnly=true)
I dunno. It seems wasteful to insert a separate CHK for a 2+2 block splitfile,
and has poor redundancy, and if we have DHKs then we're inserting 7 blocks for
that <64KB file!
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/e601f89e/attachment.pgp>
jor factor against them.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/28658dfa/attachment.pgp>
ure!", but it does not
> tell the user what should he do.
Click on the alert. then click on the link to the security levels page?
In terms of usability, I am reluctant to go back to having an explicit warning
about opennet after we have introduced the security levels...
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/b5995a61/attachment.pgp>
more they are
predictable and thus can be used by an attacker just like a full reinsert with
the original key could be.
> The thing is : how would we know the decrypting key in the case we use the
> CHKs? Would the CHK change ? In which case, what are the benefits over SSK
> (despite the facts that SSKs aren't really designed for that ^^" ) ?
The CHKs under the SSK would be unique yes. And you'd have to store the chunk
key somewhere.
> > > - Using some preview system ?
> >
> > Maybe.
> >
> > > WoT-based :
> > > - Using WOT can limit the problem for the bootstrap when you have just
> > > install the filesharing program.
> > > - Using the security of the WOT can help to find people who are
> > > publishing fake files.
> > >
> > > -
> > >---
> > >
> > > Please don't hesitate to comment. Are we missing some points, is that
> > > feasable, will it be too slow, etc...
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/97f1f330/attachment.pgp>
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> What bug tracker should we use? Trac? Jira? Lighthouse? Something else?
I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and
Lighthouse is better than all. It is simple, user friendly, doesn't
impose any particular way of
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3. June 2009 19:08:07 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> Web hosting (of static files). Sourceforge provide this, and it should
>> perform well. If there is no dynamic code there should be no administrative
>> overhead.
>
>
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 June 2009 00:59:55 Daniel Cheng wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 02 June 2009 18:24:48 steve wrote:
>> >> What good is constantly displaying the security level, unless
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 23:25:56 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 June 2009 19:41:51 clement wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here is some try from Sich and myself to think about the design for some
> > insert on demand application based on the WoT plugin.
>
> You should seriously consider
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 23:25:38 Clément wrote:
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 23:25:56 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 19:41:51 clement wrote:
Hello,
Here is some try from Sich and myself to think about the design for some
insert on demand application based on the WoT
On Thursday 04 June 2009 01:27:33 Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 00:59:55 Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Tuesday 02
On Thursday 04 June 2009 01:31:46 Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de wrote:
On Wednesday, 3. June 2009 19:08:07 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Web hosting (of static files). Sourceforge provide this, and it should
perform well. If there is no
If you really consider sf.net, someone should analyse what they
provide. And you should clearly
state what you need. The whole discussion is based on assumptions and stuff.
Fyi: sf.net has an own donation system, but you don't have to use it.
The Frost project directly
links to paypal on its
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 10:15:23 bo-le wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 29. April 2009 03:20:48 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 15:16:55 sa...@freenetproject.org wrote:
Author: saces
Date: 2009-04-21 14:16:55 + (Tue, 21 Apr 2009)
New Revision: 27153
Modified:
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 20:21:46 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
On Wednesday, 3. June 2009 19:08:07 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Web hosting (of static files). Sourceforge provide this, and it should
perform well. If there is no dynamic code there should be no administrative
overhead.
They
On Thursday 04 June 2009 12:36:31 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
If you really consider sf.net, someone should analyse what they
provide. And you should clearly
state what you need. The whole discussion is based on assumptions and stuff.
Fyi: sf.net has an own donation system, but you don't
Nextgens has suggested Google Web Apps more than once. This is a paid service
but with a generous free quota. The free quota will become rather less generous
on June 22nd. Hopefully we will get the release out before then, but we will
definitely have to pay to release 0.8. Details:
- 10GB/day
On Thursday 04 June 2009 14:06:16 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Nextgens has suggested Google Web Apps more than once. This is a paid service
but with a generous free quota. The free quota will become rather less
generous on June 22nd. Hopefully we will get the release out before then, but
we
On Thursday, 4. June 2009 14:58:35 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Can you elaborate on this? Are you saying that the only way to take
donations with sourceforge is through sourceforge's donations system? That
could cost us a significant amount of money...
That's what I read in their docs:
--
Essentially the problems are:
1. Hosting the static web site and files. This includes web hosting, hosting
big files, fixed redirects over SSL, etc. It may involve moving from
https://checksums to somewhere else, but it will still have to include SSL.
This can be solved fairly easily with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
SSKs are 1KB and have rather high overheads. You need to insert a bunch of
CHKs under the SSK, and to make that safe you need the CHK data to be
encrypted. But also you need it for security, because *the SSK is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
You should seriously consider working with infinity0, his searching plugin
will provide distributed indexing.
good neews :)
Why are you splitting the files up? Are you assuming that the key changes
every time for
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
What bug tracker should we use? Trac? Jira? Lighthouse? Something else?
I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and
Lighthouse is better than all. It is simple, user friendly, doesn't
impose
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
Nextgens has suggested Google Web Apps more than once. This is a paid service
but with a generous free quota. The free quota will become rather less
generous on June 22nd. Hopefully we will get the release out
On Thursday 04 June 2009 15:51:31 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Essentially the problems are:
1. Hosting the static web site and files. This includes web hosting, hosting
big files, fixed redirects over SSL, etc. It may involve moving from
https://checksums to somewhere else, but it will still
On Thursday 04 June 2009 17:08:22 Ian Clarke wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
What bug tracker should we use? Trac? Jira? Lighthouse? Something else?
I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and
Lighthouse is
On Thursday 04 June 2009 19:01:47 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 04 June 2009 15:51:31 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Essentially the problems are:
1. Hosting the static web site and files. This includes web hosting,
hosting big files, fixed redirects over SSL, etc. It may involve moving
---BeginMessage---
thanks but i have sorted the problem
it was the java update
i updated java runtime to the latest 1.6.0.14 and it seems that freenet
does not work with this so i have reinstalled java 1.6.0.13 and uninstalled
then reinstalled freenet
all works fine as long as i do not update
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Philip Bych pot...@googlemail.com
To: Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:46:46 +0100
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] freenet
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Thursday 04 June 2009 17:08:22 Ian Clarke wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
What bug tracker should we use? Trac? Jira? Lighthouse? Something else?
I
44 matches
Mail list logo
