Re: Racist statement of Ian Clarke on this list

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:34:51PM -0600, Ian Clarke wrote: > Thank you, Hakimi :) > > I don't think anyone in this thread seriously thinks I'm a racist. There is > just a certain type of person who thinks they can get what they want by > throwing false accusations. > > These people are toxic

Re: [freenet-dev] Similarity between original SSK proposal and Bitcoin contracts

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 05:19:34PM -0600, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Peter Todd <p...@petertodd.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:06:57PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > In practice what you can do with Bitcoin sc

Re: [freenet-dev] Similarity between original SSK proposal and Bitcoin contracts

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:06:57PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 04/02/16 20:32, Ian Clarke wrote: > > I've been reading about Bitcoin Contracts > > , and I'm surprised by the > > similarity between these and, not just SSKs, but particularly the

Re: [freenet-dev] Summary of recent opennet discussions

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:36:34PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: Basically the security model is now an attacker has to outspend the defenders in terms of Bitcoins sacrificed. Not perfect, but it may be of value, especially in conjunction with other protections. They do have potential

Re: [freenet-dev] Summary of recent opennet discussions

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:18:32PM -0500, Robert Hailey wrote: Judging from a business-process perspective, if it were up to me (and it's not!) I would elect to do these two options. Direct paypal for those that want it now (and they likely have a paypal account). I presume this is

[freenet-dev] IPv6 works?

On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 02:22:10PM -0600, Timm Murray wrote: > On Sunday 24 November 2002 13:47, Peter Todd wrote: > > I just noticed that on both of my freenet nodes the main port can be > > accessed over ipv6! I set my node address to a domainname that has a > >

[freenet-dev] IPv6 works?

I just noticed that on both of my freenet nodes the main port can be accessed over ipv6! I set my node address to a domainname that has a ipv6 address attached to it as well as ipv4 and from the looks of it my node automatically bound itself to both. The nodes are: gw.petertodd.ca and

[freenet-dev] IPv6 works?

I just noticed that on both of my freenet nodes the main port can be accessed over ipv6! I set my node address to a domainname that has a ipv6 address attached to it as well as ipv4 and from the looks of it my node automatically bound itself to both. The nodes are: gw.petertodd.ca and

Re: [freenet-dev] IPv6 works?

On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 02:22:10PM -0600, Timm Murray wrote: On Sunday 24 November 2002 13:47, Peter Todd wrote: I just noticed that on both of my freenet nodes the main port can be accessed over ipv6! I set my node address to a domainname that has a ipv6 address attached to it as well

[freenet-dev] CPU Eating & other things (bugs?)

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 06:31:54AM +1100, fish wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Um, I'm quite amazed that you can run fred on that _on a good, > > non-overloaded day_ :). > > Hey, I run my node on a p2-233, at the moment! (I, of coursae, havn't > upgraded since

Re: [freenet-dev] CPU Eating other things (bugs?)

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 06:31:54AM +1100, fish wrote: On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote: Um, I'm quite amazed that you can run fred on that _on a good, non-overloaded day_ :). Hey, I run my node on a p2-233, at the moment! (I, of coursae, havn't upgraded since 5.0.1 ;))

Re: [freenet-dev] DS taking longer to load.

On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 02:27:12PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote: does linux have equivalent functionality, or was the freenet 3 style big directory datastore not a problem there anyway? All the popular linux filesystems do efficient sparse files, IIRC. As for java support, no clue. :)

[freenet-devl] 24 CARAT GOLD PLATED DEITIES .......

On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 09:00:47AM +1100, Emil Mikulic wrote: > Peter! I thought you'd left since we hadn't heard anything > from you for so long. Nah, just been very busy with school and work and to be interested in freenet stuff. > Also, does anyone know what ever happened to Mr. Bad? Beats

[freenet-devl] Freenet 0.3 dead

On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 12:48:53PM +0200, Marco A. Calamari wrote: > Hi, > > fisrt, sorry if this is a stupid question. > > Today I had major trouble connetting to Freenet 0.3 > from my node and a couple of Italian gateway. > > gpl.txt is requestable, but all of freesites listed > in the

[freenet-devl] New Website Design

On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:40:44AM -0500, Brandon Wiley wrote: > > > I must be more tired than I thought.. emailing shouldn't be this > > difficult ;) > > > > http://buttsnot.com/freenetrough.gif > > I think this site looks really cool. I'm still amazed you can do design like that with html.

Re: [freenet-devl] New Website Design

On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:40:44AM -0500, Brandon Wiley wrote: I must be more tired than I thought.. emailing shouldn't be this difficult ;) http://buttsnot.com/freenetrough.gif I think this site looks really cool. I'm still amazed you can do design like that with html. :) --

[freenet-devl] Addressing the ubernode problem

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 08:58:56PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 05:33:21AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > And how the fuck does "one reference per node" help against a malicious > > attacker? Nothing stops them from making up a new node identity with > > every reply. > > A

[freenet-devl] Addressing the ubernode problem

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:10:51PM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: > IC> This is even a viable attack, since a > IC> node could always set itself as the datasource on all > IC> messages, creating a positive feedback loop (more references > IC> in the datastore lead to still more references

[freenet-devl] Addressing the ubernode problem

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:10:51PM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: > IC> This is even a viable attack, since a > IC> node could always set itself as the datasource on all > IC> messages, creating a positive feedback loop (more references > IC> in the datastore lead to still more references

Re: [freenet-devl] Addressing the ubernode problem

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:10:51PM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: IC This is even a viable attack, since a IC node could always set itself as the datasource on all IC messages, creating a positive feedback loop (more references IC in the datastore lead to still more references in the

Re: [freenet-devl] Addressing the ubernode problem

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:10:51PM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: IC This is even a viable attack, since a IC node could always set itself as the datasource on all IC messages, creating a positive feedback loop (more references IC in the datastore lead to still more references in the

Re: [freenet-devl] Addressing the ubernode problem

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 08:58:56PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 05:33:21AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: And how the fuck does one reference per node help against a malicious attacker? Nothing stops them from making up a new node identity with every reply. A new IP

[freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

[freenet-devl] attack against publisher anonymity

On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 10:42:50PM -0500, Timm Murray wrote: > I'm not quite certian if this attack would work at all, but we were > discussing a while back that caching might be changed to a probablistic > meathod (like there is a 1/3 chance your node won't cache a file). This > would include

Re: [freenet-devl] attack against publisher anonymity

On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 10:42:50PM -0500, Timm Murray wrote: I'm not quite certian if this attack would work at all, but we were discussing a while back that caching might be changed to a probablistic meathod (like there is a 1/3 chance your node won't cache a file). This would include the

[freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:24:44PM -0700, Rob Cakebread wrote: > > Ok, I give up. What does it actually do? Well using repeated inserts and requests fnmap attempts to figure out what nodes are "close" to each other in terms of HTL. That information is then fed to GraphViz and displayed. --

[freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

I just got a half-decent image out of my mapper. I've been running it for the past 24 hours or so. I'm still not done on the mapping, still have another 8000 connections (out of 13000) to go but it should give you some idea of what it can do. In any case I'm redoing the archetecture to make it

[freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

I just got a half-decent image out of my mapper. I've been running it for the past 24 hours or so. I'm still not done on the mapping, still have another 8000 connections (out of 13000) to go but it should give you some idea of what it can do. In any case I'm redoing the archetecture to make it

[freenet-devl] First freenet map

Here's a crude little map of 20 Freenet nodes that I just did up using the GraphViz Perl module. All inserts were done with a htl of 5 The average request htl is shown on the edges between nodes. The map needs more nodes in it obviously, only a few had any connections at all to other nodes and

[freenet-devl] Holy sh1t

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 11:40:00PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=donations > > Make sure you are sitting down, and check the recent amonymous donations > near the bottom of the page. > > I have emailed this guy to make sure his donation was intentional.

Re: [freenet-devl] Holy sh1t

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 11:40:00PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=donations Make sure you are sitting down, and check the recent amonymous donations near the bottom of the page. I have emailed this guy to make sure his donation was intentional. Yah! Now

[freenet-devl] Freeweb comments

On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:25:51AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > content on Freenet - all for a cosmetic improvement. Also, don't forget > the dangers of relying on KSKs, how would a future Rob Malda feel if > someone mounted a KSK attack and gained control of www.slashdot.free? > The best way to

Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments

On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:25:51AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: content on Freenet - all for a cosmetic improvement. Also, don't forget the dangers of relying on KSKs, how would a future Rob Malda feel if someone mounted a KSK attack and gained control of www.slashdot.free? The best way to

[freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 01:09:08AM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > > I've recompiled the lot. First thing I tested was binary > > compatibility, found that it was non-existant, so ran make clean ; > > make > > Hm. I can't reproduce the problem. There is a bug that will cause > datasource to be

Re: [freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 01:09:08AM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: I've recompiled the lot. First thing I tested was binary compatibility, found that it was non-existant, so ran make clean ; make Hm. I can't reproduce the problem. There is a bug that will cause datasource to be random when

[freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:51:01PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > > Now for bug time. :) The datasource variable just got broken. :( > > Returns pure binary junk. > > Hm. Are you sure you've recompiled all of your code? That sounds > like a likely stale-object problem. If that doesn't fix it,

[freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:37:07PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > Peter Todd writes: > > > On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:02:38AM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote:

[freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

cal use only. Do not ingest. > > Changes since 0.3.0:* Switched to ints for port numbers. > * Switched to dynamic allocation of hash handles in > the generate_hashes_ functions (thanks Peter Todd) > * Added fre

Re: [freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

. * Switched to dynamic allocation of hash handles in the generate_hashes_ functions (thanks Peter Todd) * Added freenet_close_connection() It would be nice if there was a function to close a *stream* In my fnmap code I have cancel

Re: [freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:37:07PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: Peter Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:02:38AM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: * Added freenet_close_connection() It would be nice if there was a function to close a *stream

Re: [freenet-devl] libfreenet-0.4.0

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:51:01PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: Now for bug time. :) The datasource variable just got broken. :( Returns pure binary junk. Hm. Are you sure you've recompiled all of your code? That sounds like a likely stale-object problem. If that doesn't fix it, I'll

[freenet-devl] datasource

On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 04:06:18PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > Peter Todd writes: > > > Does the datasource field come before or after the data in a > > StoreData message? From what I can see in the libfreenet code it > > comes before but I just want to be sure. >

[freenet-devl] datasource

Does the datasource field come before or after the data in a StoreData message? From what I can see in the libfreenet code it comes before but I just want to be sure. -- Need some Linux help or custom C(++) programming? Drop me a line and I'll see what I can do. Resume at

[freenet-devl] Oskar Sandberg: Employee #1

On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 12:34:03PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > As many of you will be aware, several months ago we set up a non-profit > corporation called "Freenet Project Inc", the intention of which is to > support the development of Freenet (note that this is unrelated to > Uprizer Inc). We

Re: [freenet-devl] Oskar Sandberg: Employee #1

On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 12:34:03PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: As many of you will be aware, several months ago we set up a non-profit corporation called Freenet Project Inc, the intention of which is to support the development of Freenet (note that this is unrelated to Uprizer Inc). We also

[freenet-devl] datasource

Does the datasource field come before or after the data in a StoreData message? From what I can see in the libfreenet code it comes before but I just want to be sure. -- Need some Linux help or custom C(++) programming? Drop me a line and I'll see what I can do. Resume at

[freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

Just a note... I really am working on that Freenet Mapping program. I'm currently implementing basic functions that the mapping will build on, threading functions, disk-io etc. I don't think the whole thing is going to work in the end though. The n^2 cost of a full map and the heisenburg

[freenet-devl] Freenet Mapper

Just a note... I really am working on that Freenet Mapping program. I'm currently implementing basic functions that the mapping will build on, threading functions, disk-io etc. I don't think the whole thing is going to work in the end though. The n^2 cost of a full map and the heisenburg

[freenet-devl] log analyzer authors beware of 0.4

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:51:23AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > I have also been thinking about how logging could be enhanced further. > One idea I had was to have a "dump log" facility, where the last 10 > messages of each debugging level are outputted, and could form part of a > bug report. This

Re: [freenet-devl] log analyzer authors beware of 0.4

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:51:23AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: I have also been thinking about how logging could be enhanced further. One idea I had was to have a dump log facility, where the last 10 messages of each debugging level are outputted, and could form part of a bug report. This would

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:46:23AM -0500, Brandon wrote: > The way to filter a whitelist is to subscribe by sending your public key > and some kind of credentials (not think cash) and then filter messages > which are not signed by a known public key. Filtering really isn't good enough. Though the

Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:46:23AM -0500, Brandon wrote: The way to filter a whitelist is to subscribe by sending your public key and some kind of credentials (not think cash) and then filter messages which are not signed by a known public key. Filtering really isn't good enough. Though the

[freenet-devl] Wishlist for 0.3.10

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:53:01PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:36:16PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:54:31PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:38:27AM -0700, Mr . Bad wrote: > > > >

[freenet-devl] Wishlist for 0.3.10

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:54:31PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:38:27AM -0700, Mr . Bad wrote: > > 2) Change InsertClient so that it will do the equivalent of > >freenetmirror or PutFiles if the local file is a directory. > > I actually think that we

[freenet-devl] integrating zlib compression into freenet

On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:06:52AM -0700, Aaron Voisine wrote: > er... yeah... I knew the data was encrypted. I didn't realize that the > encryption rendered the data mostly random. I suppose that makes sense, > recognizable patterns can't be good for security. I guess the only way to > do it

Re: [freenet-devl] integrating zlib compression into freenet

On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:06:52AM -0700, Aaron Voisine wrote: er... yeah... I knew the data was encrypted. I didn't realize that the encryption rendered the data mostly random. I suppose that makes sense, recognizable patterns can't be good for security. I guess the only way to do it then

[freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:12:04AM -0700, Don Marti wrote: > begin thelema quotation of Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:56:33PM -0500: > > > Lesser ability to deny is not really a problem. If someone's > > downloading illegal files off freenet, the cops are going to find the

[freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:18:13AM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: > > "DM" == Don Marti writes: > > DM> If you want deniability, I think you pretty much have to take > DM> Peter's suggestion and don't cache anything requested by a > DM> local client -- don't just blame split files. >

Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:12:04AM -0700, Don Marti wrote: begin thelema quotation of Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:56:33PM -0500: Lesser ability to deny is not really a problem. If someone's downloading illegal files off freenet, the cops are going to find the illegal data in their

Re: [freenet-devl] streaming media on freenet

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:18:13AM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: DM == Don Marti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DM If you want deniability, I think you pretty much have to take DM Peter's suggestion and don't cache anything requested by a DM local client -- don't just blame split files.

[freenet-devl] modification proposal for specific issues (name space and update issues)

On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 01:25:59PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > Unfortunately you didn't do a very good job. You have basically reinvented > a functionality we have had since last summer. I don't quite see how you > could have spent any time at all reading about or using Freenet without >

[freenet-devl] Risks of large key indexes

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 09:12:47PM -0700, Dev Random wrote: > Break up the data into shares that have to be combined in order to > recover the original. Distribute the shares in the system. > This way no node contains data that is useful/incriminating all > by itself. Doing that makes things

[freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:15:52PM -0400, Michael Carmack wrote: > Are you concerned that the future of Freenet might be jeapordized > by people (mistakenly or otherwise) associating it with pornography? > I imagine the content seen on Freenet accurately reflects the > interests of its users.

Re: [freenet-devl] freegle.com: major overhaul

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:15:52PM -0400, Michael Carmack wrote: Are you concerned that the future of Freenet might be jeapordized by people (mistakenly or otherwise) associating it with pornography? I imagine the content seen on Freenet accurately reflects the interests of its users.

[freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:22:20PM -0500, Owen Williams wrote: > On 16 Apr 2001 22:33:46 -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > > > In a mature Freenet network all nodes will be at full > > capacity. Where's this data gonna go? > > > > then it gets deleted. but mayb

Re: [freenet-devl] Think Cash based anonymous submission prototype.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 08:18:00PM +0100, Matthew Burnham wrote: In Computer Vision, the majority of the time, greyscale images are used for analysis, so perhaps a colour image 'set' to convert to a 'horrible mess' when converted to greyscale would be an idea (I guess if digits alternate in

[freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:23:11PM -0500, Owen Williams wrote: > On 17 Apr 2001 02:14:15 +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > > If you are not going to delete data in that situation - > > what are you going to do with it? > > > > My problem with this philosophy is that it is misleading. If I have

[freenet-devl] Public Keyspace and Data Submission

[freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 02:14:15AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > If all he was proposing was a different way of weighing objects in the > DataStore (I gave his mail an honest attempt and understood nothing) then > why all the ranting and attacking (luddites etc)? Nobody has ever argued > that

[freenet-devl] Public Keyspace and Data Submission

[freenet-devl] Permanance is necessary.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:44:54PM -0500, Owen Williams wrote: > Anyone want to tell me what the hell is going on here? We regularly get posts from clueless newbies saying we need permanent files and also saying they've figured out a way to do them. They have been consistantly wrong. We're just

[freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:06:14PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:05:19PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > Another day perhaps, but as of now you can end your little crusade, it > > won't get you anywhere. > > Spoken like a true arch-villian. ;) I still think he needs

[freenet-devl] Bootstrapping with Keyindexes

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:39:09AM -0700, John George wrote: > Now that keyindexes exist in Freenet, couldn't they be used to take the > place of the website running "inform.php" in the bootstrapping process? > > I was thinking that "fn_boot" keyindex could be brought on-line in > addition to

[freenet-devl] I need a few 'FreeGate's

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:27:42PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm doing some tests on key visibility, and need to use a couple of > 'FreeGate's. > (What's a FreeGate?) > A FreeGate is a Freenet node which is configured to allow FProxy connections > from outside, to use the system

[freenet-devl] Push hard or Suck hard?

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:51:06AM +1200, David McNab wrote: > I've got a dilemna with client design: > > I've seen lots of cases where newer inserted keys can't be found by others > unless they use ridiculously high HTLs. > > Which brings me to a question: > In order for a client to be useful,

Re: [freenet-devl] Push hard or Suck hard?

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:51:06AM +1200, David McNab wrote: I've got a dilemna with client design: I've seen lots of cases where newer inserted keys can't be found by others unless they use ridiculously high HTLs. Which brings me to a question: In order for a client to be useful, there

Re: [freenet-devl] I need a few 'FreeGate's

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:27:42PM +1200, David McNab wrote: Hi folks, I'm doing some tests on key visibility, and need to use a couple of 'FreeGate's. (What's a FreeGate?) A FreeGate is a Freenet node which is configured to allow FProxy connections from outside, to use the system as a

[freenet-devl] Snarfoo down?

[freenet-devl] Redesigned Gateway Page

On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 03:04:58PM -0400, Chris Anderson wrote: > On 13 Apr 2001, Mr.Bad wrote: > > > > "OS" == Oskar Sandberg writes: > > > > OS> I got tired of the old look when I was hacking towards and > > OS> http interface for 0.4 and did it this way: > > > > OS>

[freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed

On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 08:52:17PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > > My new versions are very simple BTW, test.jpg is the Freenet rabbit > > logo and test.html just says "Welcome to Freenet!" Nothing fancy. > > for those old school fans of KSK at test.html, i give you KSK at oldtest.html, > which

[freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed

On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 12:08:36AM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > I'm *not* planning to repeat this on any other keys except for > > anything matching KSK at test* There is nothing else I really object too, > > even all that KSK-based childporn. It's all labeled correctly at > > least. > > Please

[freenet-devl] "Freenet/CLI/library" flag

On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 03:45:36AM +1200, David McNab wrote: > Oscar and others, > > Please don't ever remove the "Freenet.CLI.library" flag. > It's really useful! Just out of curiosity what is it? :) -- GCS d s+:-- a--- C UL P L+++ E W++ N- o K- w-- O- M V- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP+++ t 5 X R+

[freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed

On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 09:07:43PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > Peter Todd writes: > > > Well my attack on test.jpg and test.html is well underway. I've got > > my code checking inform.php every 5 minutes and sending new copies > > using libfreenet's testclient (it's fa

[freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed

On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 09:17:18PM -0300, Adrian Lopez wrote: > The important thing to remember here is that such an attack depends on > inform.php to get a list of nodes. The inform.php script is a temporary > solution to node discovery. Once a better mechanism is in place > obtaining a large

[freenet-devl] Freenet Usage

As for the other thing traceable to me... And the rather rash and probably not all that great an idea in forsight thing! If anyone ran over the childporno.html etc. keys with nothing in them but a 1x1 webbug that was my doing. My little webbug recorded 383 hits over 5 days. 25 of those users used

[freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed

On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 03:45:58AM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > I'm personally a little irritated with you appointing yourself the > > policeman of Freenet. Censorship and monitoring sucks, period. > > I'm pretty happy when people attack Freenet, at least at this point. On > the one hand, I want

[freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed

On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 03:45:58AM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > I'm personally a little irritated with you appointing yourself the > > policeman of Freenet. Censorship and monitoring sucks, period. > > I'm pretty happy when people attack Freenet, at least at this point. On > the one hand, I want

[freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed

On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:36:44AM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 11:58:30PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > > I'm thinking of running this attack against test.jpg (!@#$ childporn, > > as a *test* key? makes us look real bad) It should work. If it does > > an

[freenet-devl] Freegle

On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 06:23:35PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > Anyone else noticed that www.freegle.com seems to be down? Looks up to me. -- GCS d s+:-- a--- C UL P L+++ E W++ N- o K- w-- O- M V- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP+++ t 5 X R+ tv-- b+ DI+ D++ G e- h! r-- y-- pete at petertodd.ca

[freenet-devl] Re: Key indices / version number

On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 04:03:15PM -0400, Michael Carmack wrote: > > > Whereas a jump to 0.3.8.2 "feels" less significant than a jump to > > > 0.3.9 and one could argue for choosing to version this way, I'm not > > > sure it's really that useful developers or users. A more logical > > > versioning

[freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed

On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:55:31AM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 09:56:22PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > > Remember: Friends don't let friends use KSK's. > > Then why are they part of Freenet? Because dispite the fact that they are very insecure they

[freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed

On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 02:46:21AM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 08:42:22PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > 3) KSKs are just pointers to to other files which provide a name. So all > >you're really doing is misassociating a name, something that we have > >to be robust

[freenet-devl] Metadata Ramblings

On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:45:36PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 06:29:20PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > I mean, really, you're talking about putting a typed functional language > > in our URIs. > > > > Here's an idea. If you want an expandabl

[freenet-devl] Metadata Ramblings

On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 06:29:20PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > I mean, really, you're talking about putting a typed functional language > in our URIs. > > Here's an idea. If you want an expandable way to specify parameters: > > freenet:SSK at 2932032/blah?baseline=203102=202020 > > Sure it's not

[freenet-devl] the encryption key for all control docs on Freenet is..

On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:55:25AM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > If we're talking about keys found in other Freenet documents (ie > hypertext) rather than through websites, graffiti, skywriting etc., then > this overhead could be avoided in most cases if there was a way of adding > simple

[freenet-devl] new date-based URIs?

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:24:41PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > I still think we should use Gregorian/GMT/Base10, since these are numbers > > that > > are meaningful to even non-technical humans. The other problem I see with > > this (besides the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" argument) is

[freenet-devl] First example of spam

Looks like someone just spammed Snarfoo's (MSK at SSK@p0EFqjmDioSqKmYYORPrClUepi4QAgE/snarfoo//) feedback KSK (KSK at snarfoo_feedback_x) with 100 messages saying "Aren't you glad I decided to only send 100 messages?" Perfect example of how vulnerable freenet mail is to spam... :( -- GCS d

[freenet-devl] "Freegle" online

On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 06:47:22PM +0200, Stefan Reich wrote: > >How does you verification work BTW? Do you download the whole key or > >abort the second something comes through? > > Currently I'm doing it the simple & stupid way - URLConnection to fproxy. I > will change this to use the official

[freenet-devl] "Freegle" online

On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:51:08AM +0200, Stefan Reich wrote: > -a little more than 1000 verified keys (all working keys from Steve's index > plus a few others) > -searching for keys or parts of keys (word-oriented, phrases and boolean > expressions too) > -direct fproxy link for each search

[freenet-devl] Needed Software?

Are there any peices of software, perferable a independent project, (IE not, say, implementing a new data store) needed for Freenet right now? I need to do a big project (10k lines code or so) for my computer science course and am looking for something to do. I was thinking of writing a stripped

  1   2   >