[freenet-dev] Fproxy insert

On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:20:49AM +1000, fish wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > Not at all, it just means that they can't insert with FProxy, I honestly > > doubt many people were actually using FProxy for inserting stuff (more > > likely they will use fcptools, freeweb,

[freenet-dev] Fproxy insert

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:42:37PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Marco A. Calamari wrote: > > None follow Ian's call for opinion about the > > fproxy insertion capability removal. > > > > My opinion about it is that was a bad(TM) idea. > > > > I

[freenet-dev] More Micro$oft insecure crap

On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:34:56PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 01:06:11PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:41:14PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:04:14AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote: > >

[freenet-dev] More Micro$oft insecure crap

On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:41:14PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:04:14AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote: > > >From Travis Bemann > > > > >It would be more appropriate to do so with something like graphical > > >Links; Mozilla is

[freenet-dev] More Micro$oft insecure crap

On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:04:14AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote: > >From Travis Bemann > > >It would be more appropriate to do so with something like graphical > >Links; Mozilla is wayyy to bloated a program to start with... > > how is graphical links portabilit

Re: [freenet-dev] More Micro$oft insecure crap

On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:04:14AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote: From Travis Bemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] It would be more appropriate to do so with something like graphical Links; Mozilla is wayyy to bloated a program to start with... how is graphical links portability wise? I know

Re: [freenet-dev] More Micro$oft insecure crap

On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:41:14PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:04:14AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote: From Travis Bemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] It would be more appropriate to do so with something like graphical Links; Mozilla is wayyy to bloated a program to start

Re: [freenet-dev] More Micro$oft insecure crap

On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:34:56PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 01:06:11PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:41:14PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:04:14AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote: From Travis Bemann [EMAIL

[freenet-dev] More Micro$oft insecure crap

On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 03:37:33PM -0500, Eric Thacker wrote: > Heres another idea.. What about a freenet browser? Why not just hack > up the mozilla code and release a browser that runs on every OS, works > with fproxy, and solves the IE/Media URL problems. This way there would > be a browser

Re: [freenet-dev] More Micro$oft insecure crap

On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 03:37:33PM -0500, Eric Thacker wrote: Heres another idea.. What about a freenet browser? Why not just hack up the mozilla code and release a browser that runs on every OS, works with fproxy, and solves the IE/Media URL problems. This way there would be a browser

[freenet-dev] Fwd: [freenet-support] Insert Key -> Web Interface

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 06:54:27PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:48:56PM -0500, Ed Onken wrote: > > It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the > > fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is > > gone. Was this

[freenet-dev] Liber(ator)/OCaml FCP 1.1.0 has been released

Liber(ator)/OCaml FCP/OCaml High Level Freenet Interface 1.1.0 has been released. While there have been some significant internal changes, in particular the factoring of a significant quantity of code, the most significant changes in this version are in building, distribution, and installation,

[freenet-dev] Liber(ator)/OCaml FCP 1.1.0 has been released

Liber(ator)/OCaml FCP/OCaml High Level Freenet Interface 1.1.0 has been released. While there have been some significant internal changes, in particular the factoring of a significant quantity of code, the most significant changes in this version are in building, distribution, and installation,

Re: [freenet-dev] Fwd: [freenet-support] Insert Key - Web Interface

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 06:54:27PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:48:56PM -0500, Ed Onken wrote: It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is gone. Was this intentional?

[freenet-dev] FProxy overhaul

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:15:03PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:31:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > While looking into making the various error and information pages > > that FProxy throws up conform to our nice new theme, I noticed how > > completely ugly the

[freenet-dev] 0.4 Release

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 10:21:48PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 09:23:58PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: > > But still, we should be extremely firm in warning users about the use > > of M$IE and the insecurity of it. I personally think that even > > A

Re: [freenet-dev] FProxy overhaul

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:15:03PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:31:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: While looking into making the various error and information pages that FProxy throws up conform to our nice new theme, I noticed how completely ugly the FProxy

[freenet-dev] 0.4 Release

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:14:25PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:06:48PM -0700, Reuben Balik wrote: > > I was looking at the Freenet project page and I > > noticed that there hasn't been a release until > > December. Since the latest build seems pretty stable > > (I

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.4 Release

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 10:21:48PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 09:23:58PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: But still, we should be extremely firm in warning users about the use of M$IE and the insecurity of it. I personally think that even ALLOWING users to view fproxy

Re: [freenet-dev] Insertion-related bug in Fred

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: Logs? Thread dumps? Profiling? On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:21:16AM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote: While testing a new feature in Liber(ator) (in CVS) which acts to insert multiple files serially, I came upon the problem

[freenet-dev] Insertion-related bug in Fred

While testing a new feature in Liber(ator) (in CVS) which acts to insert multiple files serially, I came upon the problem that the latest snapshot of Fred (20020522) would stop responding to FCP messages after the first file was inserted successfully. I know that this most likely is a new

[freenet-devl] New FCP command, ClientDelete

On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:13:38AM -0600, Mark J Roberts wrote: > Marco A. Calamari: > > this is just an hole in the "deep security" model of Freenet as a > > whole; I cannot say why, because is just another weapon for an > > attacker, but I can say that not giving one more weapon is better. > >

[freenet-devl] New FCP command, ClientDelete

On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:33:35AM +1100, Emil Mikulic wrote: > > While this may be a good reason on it's own, > > I don't see how it can justify the possibility of censorship. > > Yeah, I can just imagine some uber-conservative person out there > weeding out all the kp/pirate music/pirate

[freenet-devl] New FCP command, ClientDelete

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 12:21:18AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote: > I added a ClientDelete command to the node's FCP implementation to delete > keys from the local data store. It takes the admin password and a list of > keys. Note that you must set the admin password, and leave adminPeer unset

[freenet-devl] sun 1.1 java runtime is very broken

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:52:32PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote: > OTOH, we could take the opportunity to abandon these buggy 1.1 JVMs > altogether and start using 1.2+ features if they are supported by the > leading free JVMs (only Kaffe atm). The thing is that there is only one working free software

[freenet-devl] 0.5pre1

On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 03:23:49PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 09:55:26AM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: > > Making the Fred snapshots work with Kaffe is as simple as including > > start-freenet-kaffe.sh, which is already in CVS, in the snapshots. > > s

[freenet-devl] 0.5pre1

On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 10:40:05AM +, toad wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 01:32:32AM -0400, Ian Clarke wrote: > > Someone should really write a page on the wiki about how to get Freenet > > working with Kaffe. > > > > Ian. > > > Just include the shell script fragment attached as

[freenet-devl] 0.5pre1

On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 12:13:07AM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 02:39:33PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > <> > > Remember, every time we try to add a new goal to the project, we risk > > limiting our ability to meet the existing goals of the project (which are > >

[freenet-devl] 0.5pre1

On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 06:25:09PM +, toad wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 09:33:12PM -0800, Tom Longson wrote: > > I think this is a great idea, and as I'm putting together a freenet > > package for mac os x, I'm looking at more effective updating schemes. > > What would be excelent would be

[freenet-devl] 0.5pre1

On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 06:25:09PM +, toad wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 09:33:12PM -0800, Tom Longson wrote: > > I think this is a great idea, and as I'm putting together a freenet > > package for mac os x, I'm looking at more effective updating schemes. > > What would be excelent would be

[freenet-devl] Solution to Kaffe execution problems

On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:52:01AM +, toad wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:59:20PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: > > This is how I got the latest snapshot (20020120) to work on my box > > properly: > > > > ~/freenet-20020120$ export CLASSPATH="" &g

[freenet-devl] Solution to Kaffe execution problems

This is how I got the latest snapshot (20020120) to work on my box properly: ~/freenet-20020120$ export CLASSPATH="" ~/freenet-20020120$ java -classpath /usr/local/share/kaffe/Klasses.jar:/usr/local/share/kaffe/comm.jar:lib/freenet.jar:lib/freenet-ext.jar freenet.node.Main While removing JUST

[freenet-devl] Freenet's problems with Kaffe 1.0.6 may be due to Kaffe's servlet API

Some people have been reportedly able to get the latest snapshot of Freenet (20020119) to work with Kaffe, but I have not been able to get it to work properly. Here's the log generated by my attempt to get the latest snapshot to work with Kaffe 1.0.6: 19-Jan-02 9:47:44 PM (freenet.node.Main,

[freenet-devl] Here's a modified start-freenet.sh file that works with Kaffe (even though Fred itself may not work with Kaffe)

A modified version of start-freenet.sh, named start-freenet-kaffe.sh, is attached to this email; this modified script can actually start Freenet properly, for it runs kaffe directly with the particular parameters that kaffe expects, rather than running java with the standard Sun parameters. --

[freenet-devl] Freenet 20020117 installation

On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 02:01:47AM +, toad wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 04:06:55PM +0100, Marco A. Calamari wrote: > > Did anyone use Kaffe ? > > > I do. And Oskar does. Oskar doesn't use the tarfile. Ian uses mainstream > JVMs because Kaffe doesn't run Frost. For the same reason most of

[freenet-devl] Load handeling

On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 04:30:44PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:26:17PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > and the widespread use of God aweful network > > flooding applications like "Frost" > > Ooh, that is a harsh way to treat Freenet's first real client > application. I

[freenet-devl] Re: Wazzup?

On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:30:52PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > ian at hawk.freenetproject.org (Ian Clarke) writes: > > > I am a-little disappointed that very few people have actually taken > > advantage of the new Wikified website to add to and improve the > > information available there. >

[freenet-devl] FCP spec on freenetproject.org under devel public area

On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 08:01:48PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 07:34:16PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: > > A modified version of the FCP spec (that is, with an item for Pending > > added, and with several smaller modifications) is now up under the > &

[freenet-devl] FCP spec on freenetproject.org under devel public area

A modified version of the FCP spec (that is, with an item for Pending added, and with several smaller modifications) is now up under the devel public area at freenetproject.org. There is one problem with it, which is that TWiki is for some reason producing HTML that makes the line length in it

[freenet-devl] Wazzup?

On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 12:19:30PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote: > Travis Bemann writes: > > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 12:34:03PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > First thing would be to move the FCP documentation, which is currently > > at http://freenetproject.org/doc

[freenet-devl] Wazzup?

On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 12:34:03PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > I am a-little disappointed that very few people have actually taken > advantage of the new Wikified website to add to and improve the > information available there. In this, I don't include the many people > who have been working on

[freenet-devl] A modest proposal

On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 08:33:11PM -, John Frink wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > I know this isn't the right place to send this, but I can't get Frost to > work (which is a bit ironic considering my following proposal). > > I propose a protocol called freenym. It is an

[freenet-devl] Request for new FCP functions

On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 05:33:55PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > From: "Travis Bemann" > >The only comment is that *is this really the proper way to do this*? > >Should Freenet clients be able to restart the Freenet node at all, > >especially on multiuser systems a

[freenet-devl] Request for new FCP functions

On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 01:23:56PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to strongly request 2 easy new features for FCP. > 15 minutes work for someone who knows the node code well. > [snip] > 2) Restart Node > > With these features, there won't be any need to run the jar file for any >

[freenet-devl] if ((WTC != exist) && idiotRunsCountry) encryption = 0;

On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 08:48:36PM -0700, Jamie Morken wrote: > Hi all, > > How is freenet going to work when encryption is outlawed worldwide? I am in > Canada and they may be passing laws soon to outlaw true encryption for > civilian use. This may be the case in European countries and in the

[freenet-devl] Freenet Farewell

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 01:27:42AM -0500, Brandon Wiley wrote: > > Well I'm not going to be working on this project anymore as I have lots of > other things going on. I plan to help out with maintaining the XML-RPC > interface if there's still any interest in that in the future, but that's >

[freenet-devl] Kickass Client Apps Needed (was: Windows installer and Sun JRE)

On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 06:03:58PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > 6) FTP - not supported yet - repositories of downloadable media files are > presently implemented as a loose network of inter-linked freesites - scope > exists for a freenet client to be implemented as a localhost FTP server, > which

Re: [freenet-devl] Kickass Client Apps Needed (was: Windows installer and Sun JRE)

On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 06:03:58PM +1200, David McNab wrote: 6) FTP - not supported yet - repositories of downloadable media files are presently implemented as a loose network of inter-linked freesites - scope exists for a freenet client to be implemented as a localhost FTP server, which

Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet Farewell

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 01:27:42AM -0500, Brandon Wiley wrote: Well I'm not going to be working on this project anymore as I have lots of other things going on. I plan to help out with maintaining the XML-RPC interface if there's still any interest in that in the future, but that's about

Re: [freenet-devl] if ((WTC != exist) idiotRunsCountry) encryption = 0;

On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 08:48:36PM -0700, Jamie Morken wrote: Hi all, How is freenet going to work when encryption is outlawed worldwide? I am in Canada and they may be passing laws soon to outlaw true encryption for civilian use. This may be the case in European countries and in the USA

Re: [freenet-devl] Request for new FCP functions

On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 01:23:56PM +1200, David McNab wrote: Hi, I'd like to strongly request 2 easy new features for FCP. 15 minutes work for someone who knows the node code well. [snip] 2) Restart Node With these features, there won't be any need to run the jar file for any reason

[freenet-devl] Travis was right about Blackdown

On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 04:09:42PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > $ cat nohup.out > # > # HotSpot Virtual Machine Error, Internal Error > # Please report this error at > # http://www.blackdown.org/cgi-bin/jdk > # > # Error ID: 415353454D424C45523F491418160E43505001A3 > # > # Problematic Thread:

[freenet-devl] 0.4 on a full datastore

On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:33:18AM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > > Okay, now which JVM are you using? > > Blackdown 1.3.1 under RedHat 6.2. First thing - Blackdown is an absolute piece of shit. I've used it, and it always crashed when I tried to start a Freenet node. Therefore, I quickly

Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 on a full datastore

On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:33:18AM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: Okay, now which JVM are you using? Blackdown 1.3.1 under RedHat 6.2. First thing - Blackdown is an absolute piece of shit. I've used it, and it always crashed when I tried to start a Freenet node. Therefore, I quickly switched

[freenet-devl] Please test fcpproxy

On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 06:51:05PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > Hi all, > > The first cut of fcpproxy (the stable fwproxy replacement) is now in cvs > and ready for initial testing. > > As mentioned before, it's built on the robust JunkBusters proxy engine, > and takes great liberties under GPL

Re: [freenet-devl] Status on 0.3.9.3

On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:08:21AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 01:06:26AM -0500, Brandon Wiley wrote: OK, I'll try and track these down. My gut guess is that they won't be GPL-compatible, but we'll see. They don't have to be GPL-compatible. They just have

[freenet-devl] Nostalgia

On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Jan-Thomas Czornack wrote: > > Ok, I'll take your word for it, but I had to jab when a W2k user was the > > first to complain. > > > > While I have the Anything-but-Windows Spotlight, I'd like to point out > > that Windows 2000 requires a substantial

[freenet-devl] Oskar Sandberg: Employee #1

On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:12:57AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 02:37:49PM -0700, Mr.Bad wrote: > > > "SR" == Stefan Reich writes: > > > > >> We are extremely fortunate that Oskar Sandberg has agreed to > > >> work full-time on Freenet this summer, supported

Re: [freenet-devl] Oskar Sandberg: Employee #1

On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:12:57AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 02:37:49PM -0700, Mr.Bad wrote: SR == Stefan Reich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We are extremely fortunate that Oskar Sandberg has agreed to work full-time on Freenet this summer, supported

[freenet-devl] More IndexClient suggestions

On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 05:39:39PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > IndexClient doesn't do any user interface stuff. All this stuff is > > handled by the various programs which use it, and even they very often > > don't have user interfaces (such as the freenet-mail/SMTP gateway and > > the

Re: [freenet-devl] More IndexClient suggestions

On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 05:39:39PM -0500, Brandon wrote: IndexClient doesn't do any user interface stuff. All this stuff is handled by the various programs which use it, and even they very often don't have user interfaces (such as the freenet-mail/SMTP gateway and the freenet-news/NNTP

[freenet-devl] More IndexClient suggestions

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 09:05:15AM -0700, Rob Cakebread wrote: > > > When you list indexes they all run together. > > How about listing each key or printing a delimiter? IndexClient doesn't do any user interface stuff. All this stuff is handled by the various programs which use it, and even

[freenet-devl] Problem with IndexClient design

There is a critical problem with the design of IndexClient. When using dates, IndexClient assumes that the date is the current date (UTC/GMT, of course). This is fine when inserting files into something like a newsgroup or mailbox, but it is horribly unsuitable when requesting items from a

[freenet-devl] An eXtensible Freenet Message Board System

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 02:01:15PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > From: "Travis Bemann" > > >We (actually, Brandon and I for the most part (even though I haven't > >done too much work lately)) have done a moderate deal of work on > >something called freenet-news

Re: [freenet-devl] More IndexClient suggestions

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 09:05:15AM -0700, Rob Cakebread wrote: When you list indexes they all run together. How about listing each key or printing a delimiter? IndexClient doesn't do any user interface stuff. All this stuff is handled by the various programs which use it, and even

[freenet-devl] An eXtensible Freenet Message Board System

On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 08:56:25PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 04:36:43PM -0400, Jeffrey Borden wrote: > > I have implemented a Freenet Message Board System for a school project. > > > > The system uses XML files and transactions to allow users to

Re: [freenet-devl] An eXtensible Freenet Message Board System

On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 08:56:25PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 04:36:43PM -0400, Jeffrey Borden wrote: I have implemented a Freenet Message Board System for a school project. The system uses XML files and transactions to allow users to maintain message boards

Re: [freenet-devl] An eXtensible Freenet Message Board System

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 02:01:15PM +1200, David McNab wrote: From: Travis Bemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] We (actually, Brandon and I for the most part (even though I haven't done too much work lately)) have done a moderate deal of work on something called freenet-news, which is essentially Usenet

[freenet-devl] Problem with IndexClient design

There is a critical problem with the design of IndexClient. When using dates, IndexClient assumes that the date is the current date (UTC/GMT, of course). This is fine when inserting files into something like a newsgroup or mailbox, but it is horribly unsuitable when requesting items from a

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: multipart/signed Size: 1 bytes Desc: not available URL:

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:09:45AM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 07:46:21AM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote: > > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 12:19:48AM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > > > > > > > Now you just need to suggest a pu

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:08:31AM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > > is the best I can come up with. > > > > Overall, the problem is that there are NO things that humans can do > > that machines can't do, computationally, at the theoretical level. > Thats complete bullshit. There are plenty of

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 01:30:28AM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 12:19:48AM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > > > > > Now you just need to suggest a puzzle which is machine generatable, n

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 12:19:48AM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > > > Now you just need to suggest a puzzle which is machine generatable, not > > machine solvable, and not too obnoxious. > > Heres one idea, but I dont think it generates enough information for a > key. I define "enough

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 11:29:52PM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > > > A whitelist effectively stops spam. You have to check a possibly spammable > > keyspace, spam can be removed from it mechanically. Think cash requires > > this as well. It just uses a token instead of a signature as the > >

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 11:14:46PM -0400, Mark J. Roberts wrote: > On Tue, 1 May 2001, Travis Bemann wrote: > > > 2. Does not require any Java or Javascript or any other sort of smart > > content. > > Think cash requires a client that understands think cash. B

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 04:45:46PM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 05:35:27PM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote: > > On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 09:37:06AM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > > On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 12:07:34AM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > &

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 09:37:06AM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 12:07:34AM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > > > Reminds me of SecureCard, the credit card sized random number generator > > > synchronized with a login password challenge. Could use Think Cash to > > > seed it

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 05:18:59PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 07:05:43PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > Yes, but I already have such an e-mail client, which is why I'm asking how > > this is useful. > > firstly, your email client is just one example, not everyone might wish >

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 04:25:59PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > Here is a document I just finished - comments are welcome: > > Freenet Client Protocol Layer #3 : Stacks > Draft > > Introduction > > > This document is an informal description of the third layer of the > Freenet Client

Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 09:37:06AM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 12:07:34AM -0500, Brandon wrote: Reminds me of SecureCard, the credit card sized random number generator synchronized with a login password challenge. Could use Think Cash to seed it so that you

Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 11:14:46PM -0400, Mark J. Roberts wrote: On Tue, 1 May 2001, Travis Bemann wrote: 2. Does not require any Java or Javascript or any other sort of smart content. Think cash requires a client that understands think cash. But we CANNOT AT ALL rely on client

Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks

On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 11:29:52PM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: A whitelist effectively stops spam. You have to check a possibly spammable keyspace, spam can be removed from it mechanically. Think cash requires this as well. It just uses a token instead of a signature as the

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3

On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 11:20:44AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:40:25AM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote: > > > #3 Stacks > > > Supports "stacks", these are a generic name for documents which are > > > updated by appending a higher

Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3

On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 11:20:44AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:40:25AM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote: #3 Stacks Supports stacks, these are a generic name for documents which are updated by appending a higher number each-time. Stacks may be public or private

[freenet-devl] integrating zlib compression into freenet

On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:00:00AM +0100, toad wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:48:58PM -0500, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > > > > > One solution would be to have a minimum compression threshold. Files > > > under this threshold would be uncompressed, and files larger than this > > > threshold

[freenet-devl] integrating zlib compression into freenet

On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 07:21:22PM -0400, Chris Anderson wrote: > On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Stefan Reich wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Chris Anderson" > > > > So, the equation becomes, for sufficiently small data values, compress > > > > time + const xfer time vs. const xfer

[freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:41:47PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > FCP* seems to be separating out into three layers, these are: > > [* By FCP I also include the XML-RPC interface] > > #1 Basic > Standard insert/request along with pk generation stuff > > #2 Metadata > Intercepts metadata documents

[freenet-devl] fproxy bug?

On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:31:59PM -0500, Owen Williams wrote: > my .fproxyrc says that ServerAddress=127.0.0.1:19114, but it tries to

[freenet-devl] Manifest Tools Broken

On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 04:36:23AM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > The changes to the client API seem to have broken both freenetmirror and > PutFiles. How has the client API been changed? I might need to know because if such changes break freenetmirror and PutFiles, they might also break EOF news?

Re: [freenet-devl] fproxy bug?

On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:31:59PM -0500, Owen Williams wrote: my .fproxyrc says that ServerAddress=127.0.0.1:19114, but it tries to contact my ip when I request documents. since I'm behind a firewall this doesn't work. has this bug been fixed in cvs? Freenet.ConnectFailedException:

[freenet-devl] Proposal: Freenews

On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 01:31:34AM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 01:21:46AM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:09:58AM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > > > > > I have thought of an idea that could make freenet a lot

[freenet-devl] Proposal: Freenews

On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 01:21:46AM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:09:58AM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > > > I have thought of an idea that could make freenet a lot more useful. > > > Basically the idea is a Freenews - a freenet based usene

[freenet-devl] Proposal: Freenews

On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:09:58AM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > I have thought of an idea that could make freenet a lot more useful. > > Basically the idea is a Freenews - a freenet based usenet. > > The EOF project (eof.sourceforge.net) has a functioning news over Freenet > implementation and an

Re: [freenet-devl] Proposal: Freenews

On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 01:21:46AM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:09:58AM -0500, Brandon wrote: I have thought of an idea that could make freenet a lot more useful. Basically the idea is a Freenews - a freenet based usenet. The EOF project

[freenet-devl] Snowhite and the Seven Dwarfs - The REAL story!

On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:11:28PM -0700, Hahaha wrote: > Today, Snowhite was turning 18. The 7 Dwarfs always where very educated and > polite with Snowhite. When they go out work at mornign, they promissed a > *huge* surprise. Snowhite was anxious. Suddlently, the door open, and the > Seven >

[freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed

On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 09:54:44PM -0400, Mark J. Roberts wrote: > On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Travis Bemann wrote: > > > Yeah, I completely agree. Mimetype in metadata which fproxy > > understands would make life much easier (compared to guessing based on > > the names o

[freenet-devl] Freenet Usage

[I decided to resend this because my machine's date and time was fucked up, so the previous message with this content may be far in the back of your email box]

[freenet-devl] Freenet homepage hacked

On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 10:21:29PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > Travis Bemann writes: > > > On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 09:56:53PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:56:59PM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote: > > > > Lighten up! > > >

[freenet-devl] Freenet homepage hacked

On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 09:56:53PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:56:59PM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote: > > Lighten up! > > .. said the Rage Against The Machine fan. :-) Look - I like anything rebellious (and especially anarchist) which can be really c

  1   2   3   >