[freenet-dev] Transient nodes & Freenet Growing Pains

[Naive suggestion enclosed...] I've been reading through the various posts that postulate the recent freenet slowdown is due to transient nodes. As far as I understand things, transient nodes are essentially 'parasites' living off the network without giving anything back. Here's my latest silly

[freenet-dev] Transient nodes Freenet Growing Pains

[Naive suggestion enclosed...] I've been reading through the various posts that postulate the recent freenet slowdown is due to transient nodes. As far as I understand things, transient nodes are essentially 'parasites' living off the network without giving anything back. Here's my latest silly

[freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

> -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Toseland > Sent: 28 October 2002 21:09 > To: devl at freenetproject.org > Cc: ian at freenetproject.org > Subject: [freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released > > > Hi.

[freenet-dev] If you are seeing extraordinary CPU usage with 600+ builds:

> -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Oskar Sandberg > Sent: 28 October 2002 19:01 > To: devl at freenetproject.org > Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] If you are seeing extraordinary CPU usage > with 600+ builds: >

[freenet-dev] What is the earliest that we can release 0.5.1?

Assuming it's technically a go go, please do. My node's just sitting here happily rejecting everything like a smurf with it's hands over it's ears. > -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Toseland >

[freenet-dev] JobsExecuted graph anyone?

> -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Ian Clarke > Sent: 28 October 2002 11:21 > To: devl at freenetproject.org > Subject: [freenet-dev] JobsExecuted graph anyone? > > > Does anyone have this graph: > >

[freenet-dev] Current global load avg?

Hi, Does anyone have a global load avg? I've restarted my node, it's been up 10 minutes, but my network load data looks like this: entries: 0 globalRequestsPerHour: 0.0 localRequestsPerHour: 9592.239 Also, I thought the QueryReject code only kicked in when the load hit's 95% or so, should this be

[freenet-dev] Current global load avg?

Hi, Does anyone have a global load avg? I've restarted my node, it's been up 10 minutes, but my network load data looks like this: entries: 0 globalRequestsPerHour: 0.0 localRequestsPerHour: 9592.239 Also, I thought the QueryReject code only kicked in when the load hit's 95% or so, should this be

RE: [freenet-dev] JobsExecuted graph anyone?

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:devl-admin;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Ian Clarke Sent: 28 October 2002 11:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-dev] JobsExecuted graph anyone? Does anyone have this graph:

RE: [freenet-dev] What is the earliest that we can release 0.5.1?

Assuming it's technically a go go, please do. My node's just sitting here happily rejecting everything like a smurf with it's hands over it's ears. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:devl-admin;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Toseland Sent: 28 October 2002

[freenet-dev] Website updated - check it out - offer suggestions

> -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Ian Clarke > Sent: 27 October 2002 21:20 > To: devl at freenetproject.org > Subject: [freenet-dev] Website updated - check it out - offer > suggestions > > > I have updated

[freenet-dev] Question/suggestoin

> -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Toseland > Sent: 27 October 2002 16:16 > To: devl at freenetproject.org > Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Question/suggestoin > > > On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 01:29:09PM

[freenet-dev] Question/suggestoin

> -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Ed Tomlinson > Sent: 27 October 2002 11:29 > To: devl at freenetproject.org > Subject: [freenet-dev] Question/suggestoin > > > Hi, > > My node lives on a dsl connection.

RE: [freenet-dev] Question/suggestoin

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:devl-admin;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Ed Tomlinson Sent: 27 October 2002 11:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-dev] Question/suggestoin Hi, My node lives on a dsl connection. My ip changes every couple of day or

RE: [freenet-dev] Website updated - check it out - offer suggestions

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:devl-admin;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Ian Clarke Sent: 27 October 2002 21:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-dev] Website updated - check it out - offer suggestions I have updated the website. If anyone has any

[freenet-dev] Hopefully final 0.5 point release windows installer available

> - Original Message - > From: "William_dw -- Sqlcoders" > > > This fails for me, > > already had freenet installed.. > > > > -Exited freenet > > -Downloaded installer > > -Started installer > > -Chose to keep existing freenet.

[freenet-dev] Hopefully final 0.5 point release windows installer available

enetproject.org > Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Hopefully final 0.5 point release windows > installer available > > > - Original Message - > From: "William_dw -- Sqlcoders" > > > Aargh, > > that darn 'Do you want to remove a failed installation' &g

[freenet-dev] Hopefully final 0.5 point release windows installer available

Aargh, that darn 'Do you want to remove a failed installation' question flew by & it's deleting my datastore. Bye bye 4 days of data :( > -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Mathew Ryden > Sent: 23 October

[freenet-dev] Hopefully final 0.5 point release windows installer available

> -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Mathew Ryden > Sent: 23 October 2002 18:20 > To: chat at freenetproject.org; devl at freenetproject.org; > support at freenetproject.org > Subject: [freenet-dev] Hopefully

RE: [freenet-dev] Hopefully final 0.5 point release windows installer available

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:devl-admin;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Mathew Ryden Sent: 23 October 2002 18:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-dev] Hopefully final 0.5 point release windows installer available

RE: [freenet-dev] Hopefully final 0.5 point release windows installer available

Aargh, that darn 'Do you want to remove a failed installation' question flew by it's deleting my datastore. Bye bye 4 days of data :( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:devl-admin;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Mathew Ryden Sent: 23 October 2002 18:20 To: [EMAIL

RE: [freenet-dev] Hopefully final 0.5 point release windows installer available

] Hopefully final 0.5 point release windows installer available - Original Message - From: William_dw -- Sqlcoders [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aargh, that darn 'Do you want to remove a failed installation' question flew by it's deleting my datastore. Bye bye 4 days of data :( Whoa

RE: [freenet-dev] Hopefully final 0.5 point release windows installer available

- Original Message - From: William_dw -- Sqlcoders [EMAIL PROTECTED] This fails for me, already had freenet installed.. -Exited freenet -Downloaded installer -Started installer -Chose to keep existing freenet.ini -Statusbar said 'Creating socket' -Msgbox appears saying

[freenet-dev] Re: yet another another new windows installer

> > Is there anything else I should have on my todo list for the windows > installer? > - make it so that nodeconf can change every option > - have nodeconf just edit the config in place (effectively, have it treat > %'s and not have to be manually rewritten) > - build in search for fproxy.* and

[freenet-dev] FProxy insert fails

> Sqlcoders wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Here's the debug log & an insert screen copy that might be > helpful... > > > > > > > > freenet.jar is 1,413,120 bytes on disk. I just ran the > snapshot updated > > > > successfully twice in a row for another posting, and the > filesize is the > > > > same

[freenet-dev] FProxy insert fails

Oct 21, 2002 at 05:29:20PM -0600, William_dw -- Sqlcoders wrote: > > Hi, > > Here's the debug log & an insert screen copy that might be helpful... > > > > freenet.jar is 1,413,120 bytes on disk. I just ran the snapshot updated > > successfully twice in a row for a

[freenet-dev] Windows Updater Fails

> -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of SiliconZealot > Sent: 21 October 2002 17:34 > To: devl at freenetproject.org > Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Updater Fails > > > ouch. If true, could play hell with

[freenet-dev] FProxy insert fails

Hi, Here's the debug log & an insert screen copy that might be helpful... freenet.jar is 1,413,120 bytes on disk. I just ran the snapshot updated successfully twice in a row for another posting, and the filesize is the same (to the byte), so I'm assuming my snapshot is as up to date as can be :)

[freenet-dev] Windows Updater Fails

Just a note for the windows installer people: If freenet is running & the snapshot updater is started, the updater will close freenet but fail. If freenet isn't running the snapshot updater succeeds. I've tried this with freenet running, then freenet not running, and then freenet running again.

[freenet-dev] Inserting a file fails with the latest snapshot

> > > > > > This is the byte size after redownload: > > Size: 127,205 > > Size on disk: 131,072 > For freenet.jar? That shouldn't even run. It is possible that you caught > it in the middle of an upload, in which case you should try again. > > > > And the new one runs, but I get > > You're right,

[freenet-dev] Inserting a file fails with the latest snapshot

latest > snapshot > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 04:02:40PM -0600, William_dw -- Sqlcoders wrote: > > > > > freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory$LRUWalk.getNext(NativeFSDirectory > > > .java:70) > > > >

[freenet-dev] yet another another new windows installer

> > to 8812. I'm pretty sure where it is occuring but most likely > > won't be able > > to fix it until ~3 hours from now. > > > > Anyone who finds a new bug in the windows installer or brings > my attention > > back to a real bug will get $5 or my thanks, whichever I happen > > to have more > >

[freenet-dev] yet another another new windows installer

> -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Mathew Ryden > Sent: 21 October 2002 15:55 > To: devl at freenetproject.org; chat at freenetproject.org; > support at freenetproject.org > Subject: [freenet-dev] yet

[freenet-dev] Inserting a file fails with the latest snapshot

> freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory$LRUWalk.getNext(NativeFSDirectory > .java:70) > > at freenet.support.WalkEnumeration.(WalkEnumeration.java:16) > > at > freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory.lruKeys(NativeFSDirectory.java:479) > > at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java:447) > How recent is

[freenet-dev] Inserting a file fails with the latest snapshot

> freenet.client.http.InsertContext.insertMetadata(InsertContext.java:588) > > at freenet.client.http.InsertContext.run(InsertContext.java:610) > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) > I need more information, so please run the current snapshot and try > again. > > > > > > I was

[freenet-dev] Inserting a file fails with the latest snapshot

Hi, latest snapshot (updated via the freenet update tool for windows), new error message on inserts (windows).. Inserting a split file can consume a lot of resources. Use the link below if you want to stop the

[freenet-dev] Web Interface default hostname

Just another quick question/note/thingamajig, not sure if this is common or trivial or somesuch... The default windows install keeps trying to load the web interface (FProxy) as http://127.0.0.1:, This creates two problems for me: 1) I dont 'live' on 127.0.0.1, I'm on 10.0.0.2 because of my

[freenet-dev] Windows 'Update snapshot' exits without any confirmation message

Just a note to the windows installer folks, The 'Update snapshot' app exits without any confirmation screen, if it becomes necessary to ask a lot of people to update the snapshot after 0.5 is released it would be good to actually get a message (just an alertbox saying 'Snapshot updated, please

[freenet-dev] Web Interface default hostname

Just another quick question/note/thingamajig, not sure if this is common or trivial or somesuch... The default windows install keeps trying to load the web interface (FProxy) as http://127.0.0.1:, This creates two problems for me: 1) I dont 'live' on 127.0.0.1, I'm on 10.0.0.2 because of my

RE: [freenet-dev] Inserting a file fails with the latest snapshot

freenet.client.http.InsertContext.insertMetadata(InsertContext.java:588) at freenet.client.http.InsertContext.run(InsertContext.java:610) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) I need more information, so please run the current snapshot and try again. I was running Build:

RE: [freenet-dev] Inserting a file fails with the latest snapshot

freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory$LRUWalk.getNext(NativeFSDirectory .java:70) at freenet.support.WalkEnumeration.init(WalkEnumeration.java:16) at freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory.lruKeys(NativeFSDirectory.java:479) at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java:447) How recent is this?

RE: [freenet-dev] yet another another new windows installer

to 8812. I'm pretty sure where it is occuring but most likely won't be able to fix it until ~3 hours from now. Anyone who finds a new bug in the windows installer or brings my attention back to a real bug will get $5 or my thanks, whichever I happen to have more of (probably the

RE: [freenet-dev] Inserting a file fails with the latest snapshot

This is the byte size after redownload: Size: 127,205 Size on disk: 131,072 For freenet.jar? That shouldn't even run. It is possible that you caught it in the middle of an upload, in which case you should try again. And the new one runs, but I get You're right, it shouldnt, I

[freenet-dev] Windows Updater Fails

Just a note for the windows installer people: If freenet is running the snapshot updater is started, the updater will close freenet but fail. If freenet isn't running the snapshot updater succeeds. I've tried this with freenet running, then freenet not running, and then freenet running again.

[freenet-dev] FProxy insert fails

Hi, Here's the debug log an insert screen copy that might be helpful... freenet.jar is 1,413,120 bytes on disk. I just ran the snapshot updated successfully twice in a row for another posting, and the filesize is the same (to the byte), so I'm assuming my snapshot is as up to date as can be :)

RE: [freenet-dev] Windows Updater Fails

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:devl-admin;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of SiliconZealot Sent: 21 October 2002 17:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Updater Fails ouch. If true, could play hell with my early morning cron job... =)

RE: [freenet-dev] FProxy insert fails

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:devl-admin;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Toseland Sent: 21 October 2002 18:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] FProxy insert fails On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 05:29:20PM -0600, William_dw -- Sqlcoders wrote

[freenet-dev] Does fproxy FEC inserting work on windows for anyone?

> Insert Succeeded. > > --- end copy -- > Cool. But this is too small to be FEC encoded. Could you try something > about 1-2Mb. You can insert with htl=0 if you don't want to wait > for a real > insert. > > --gj > No problem, Inserted PHP Windows Manual (~3MB at

[freenet-dev] 0.5 release - Wednesday

> -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Toseland > Sent: 20 October 2002 16:44 > To: devl at freenetproject.org > Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5 release - Wednesday > > > No, only *critical* bugs. Such

[freenet-dev] I think something's wrong with my node

Hi, I think something's wrong with my node, I just downloaded the latest snapshot with the windows webinstall... I inserted a file and tried to reach the freedom engine. The first request took around 3 minutes, and the insert took 60 seconds or so. Now this is the strange part: After those two

[freenet-dev] Does fproxy FEC inserting work on windows for anyone?

> -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Gianni Johansson > Sent: 20 October 2002 12:34 > To: devl at freenetproject.org > Subject: [freenet-dev] Does fproxy FEC inserting work on windows for > anyone? > > > I

[freenet-dev] I think something's wrong with my node

Hi, I think something's wrong with my node, I just downloaded the latest snapshot with the windows webinstall... I inserted a file and tried to reach the freedom engine. The first request took around 3 minutes, and the insert took 60 seconds or so. Now this is the strange part: After those two

RE: [freenet-dev] Does fproxy FEC inserting work on windows for anyone?

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:devl-admin;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Gianni Johansson Sent: 20 October 2002 12:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-dev] Does fproxy FEC inserting work on windows for anyone? I just tried the newest web installer. I

RE: [freenet-dev] 0.5 release - Wednesday

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:devl-admin;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Toseland Sent: 20 October 2002 16:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5 release - Wednesday snip No, only *critical* bugs. Such as the very long loading time

[freenet-dev] MIME-browser-check for users

. > > > - Original Message - > From: "William_dw -- Sqlcoders" > To: > Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 3:47 PM > Subject: RE: [freenet-dev] MIME-browser-check for users > > > > This looks like just the ticket... > > > > http://suppor

[freenet-dev] MIME-browser-check for users

This looks like just the ticket... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239750 Nice name for the registry key, 'isPlainTextHonoured'. You'd think it was optional to display plain text as plain text. > -Original Message- > From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org >

RE: [freenet-dev] MIME-browser-check for users

This looks like just the ticket... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239750 Nice name for the registry key, 'isPlainTextHonoured'. You'd think it was optional to display plain text as plain text. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [freenet-dev] MIME-browser-check for users

]]On Behalf Of SiliconZealot Sent: 08 September 2002 11:59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] MIME-browser-check for users This seems to only apply to IE5/win9x. I find no such registry key on my IE6/WinXP box. - Original Message - From: William_dw -- Sqlcoders [EMAIL

[freenet-dev] MSIE issues

> > > > > > If IE is detected, FProxy could make an HTML document with a large > > > > > > > > > (say, 70 cols and 25 rows) and put the actual document in > that. Surely > > > IE won't parse HTML inside a . Or would it? > > > > This is just a thought, but... > > > > If I wanted to be malicious

RE: [freenet-dev] MSIE issues

If IE is detected, FProxy could make an HTML document with a large TEXTAREA (say, 70 cols and 25 rows) and put the actual document in that. Surely IE won't parse HTML inside a TEXTAREA. Or would it? This is just a thought, but... If I wanted to be malicious I could

[freenet-dev] MSIE issues

> > > > > >As a final thought, couldn't we just work around deficiencies like > > >that? What happens if you send "text/x-really-plain" instead? > > > > > >-- > > >Robbe > > > > As far as I've found IE really likes HTML, unless it pop's up a file > > download box it will try to interpret any HTML

[freenet-dev] MSIE issues

>-Original Message- >From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org >[mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Robert Bihlmeyer >Sent: 06 September 2002 12:44 >To: devl at freenetproject.org >Subject: [freenet-dev] MSIE issues >As a final thought, couldn't we just work around

RE: [freenet-dev] MSIE issues

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Bihlmeyer Sent: 06 September 2002 12:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-dev] MSIE issues As a final thought, couldn't we just work around deficiencies like that? What happens if you send

RE: [freenet-dev] MSIE issues

As a final thought, couldn't we just work around deficiencies like that? What happens if you send text/x-really-plain instead? -- Robbe As far as I've found IE really likes HTML, unless it pop's up a file download box it will try to interpret any HTML looking text in the file

[freenet-devl] Freenet hex DBR format

>> I'm not qualified from a java perspective, >> but boy does that sound good from a user perspective, >> freenet is actually becoming easy(ier) to use :) > >There is no need to be insulting. ? I think you might have picked up the wrong end of the stick somewhere along the way, I wasnt insulting

[freenet-devl] Freenet hex DBR format

> > > >before being mapped to the 23 byte SSK value would not be any different. > >Doing the actual hashing on a seconds since the epoch value makes a lot > >of sense, since date formats are complicated often include a lot of > >redundancy. > > > > Cvs uses getdate, public domain code that parses

[freenet-devl] InterScan NT Alert

>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:21:22PM +, Timm Murray wrote: >> > This is getting really bloody annoying. Is there any way we can ban any post that isn't 100% >> > text/text. >> >> So that we don't have to read anything that Ian, Adam, or Scott posts? > >Oh thats right, crypto programs use a

[freenet-devl] Auto-ip address detection

> And people ask why software works so badly... > > hey don't get your panties in a twist, it was just my 2 cents, I didn't say to do it that way, I just threw in a possible idea, feel free to tell us the proper way, if you do that then it'll solve the problem that I was trying(a bad attempt

[freenet-devl] Auto-ip address detection

>A cross-platform solution (though a kludgy one) would be to open up a ServerSocket on >port n, then have a Socket open up a connection to localhost:n, then read the IP with >Socket.getLocalAddress(). Will that work? Not with windows sockets in my experience, Windows figures that any local

[freenet-devl] State of Freenet #2

- Original Message - From: "Are" To: Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 12:27 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] State of Freenet #2 >> Of course if i knew java i'd be creating something similar to ie's "ie has >> caused a crash, can we send debug info for anyalisis?"

[freenet-devl] State of Freenet #2

A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7m Type: application/x-pkcs7-mime Size: 8638 bytes Desc: not available URL:

[freenet-devl] State of Freenet #2

- Original Message - From: "Mark J Roberts" To: Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 10:43 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] State of Freenet #2 > Ian Clarke: > > 0.4 is working well surprisingly well despite a number of serious > > outstanding bugs. > > There are under a dozen