On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 12:42:07PM -0500, Ed Onken wrote:
> I agree and would like to ask to clarify one thing that Greg proposed and
> add another idea and propose a workaround for the whole issue of human
> readable dates:
>
> Is the new HTL in idea #2 incremented from the previous HTL? Only
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:18:23PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > http://127.0.0.1:/__USE_DATE_20020817__SSK at
> > > rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/TFE//
>
> I think that the user interface should work like this:
>
(snip)
Thanks for stating the bleedin obvious. Some of us around here ha
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 12:33:58AM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Friday 30 August 2002 08:57, Matthew wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > Hi. Newly implemented fproxy functionality allows you to fetch an old
> > > edition of a DBR site, like
> > http://127.0.0.1:/__USE_DATE_20020817__SSK at
> > rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/TFE//
I think that the user interface should work like this:
1) User goes to TFE, and clicks on a link for a site.
2) After a while, fred says DataNotFound, and fproxy draws a page that
looks like this:
I agree and would like to ask to clarify one thing that Greg proposed and
add another idea and propose a workaround for the whole issue of human
readable dates:
Is the new HTL in idea #2 incremented from the previous HTL? Only for
DNF's? I assume most people have 15 for their default fproxy H
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 12:42:07PM -0500, Ed Onken wrote:
> I agree and would like to ask to clarify one thing that Greg proposed and
> add another idea and propose a workaround for the whole issue of human
> readable dates:
>
> Is the new HTL in idea #2 incremented from the previous HTL? Only
I agree and would like to ask to clarify one thing that Greg proposed and
add another idea and propose a workaround for the whole issue of human
readable dates:
Is the new HTL in idea #2 incremented from the previous HTL? Only for
DNF's? I assume most people have 15 for their default fproxy
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:18:23PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >
>http://127.0.0.1:/__USE_DATE_20020817__SSK@rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/TFE//
>
> I think that the user interface should work like this:
>
(snip)
Thanks for stating the bleedin obvious. Some of us around here have
actu
> >
>http://127.0.0.1:/__USE_DATE_20020817__SSK@rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/TFE//
I think that the user interface should work like this:
1) User goes to TFE, and clicks on a link for a site.
2) After a while, fred says DataNotFound, and fproxy draws a page that
looks like this:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 12:33:58AM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Friday 30 August 2002 08:57, Matthew wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > Hi. Newly implemented fproxy functionality allows you to fetch an old
> > > edition of a DBR site, lik
On Friday 30 August 2002 08:57, Matthew wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Hi. Newly implemented fproxy functionality allows you to fetch an old
> > edition of a DBR site, like this:
> > http://127.0.0.1:/SSK at rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/TFE/
On Friday 30 August 2002 08:57, Matthew wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Hi. Newly implemented fproxy functionality allows you to fetch an old
> > edition of a DBR site, like this:
> > http://127.0.0.1:/SSK@rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/TFE//?
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Hi. Newly implemented fproxy functionality allows you to fetch an old
> edition of a DBR site, like this:
> http://127.0.0.1:/SSK at
> rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/TFE//?date=20020817
>
> A test page with activelinks to th
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Hi. Newly implemented fproxy functionality allows you to fetch an old
> edition of a DBR site, like this:
> http://127.0.0.1:/SSK@rBjVda8pC-Kq04jUurIAb8IzAGcPAgM/TFE//?date=20020817
>
> A test page with activelinks to the las
14 matches
Mail list logo
