Ian Clarke writes:
> No, but we could add the insert functionality back-in under the new GUI
> layout. I simply got the impression that it wasn't really being used,
> and thus maybe it would be better if FProxy became a pure retrieval
> tool, leaving insertion to other specialized tools like
Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, but we could add the insert functionality back-in under the new GUI
> layout. I simply got the impression that it wasn't really being used,
> and thus maybe it would be better if FProxy became a pure retrieval
> tool, leaving insertion to other spe
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 06:50:13PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Inserting from the same program which you use all day to browse
> Freenet is a big win. For a single document, it's probably the
> quickest way (especially if you don't dig commandline).
Yeah, perhaps.
> Most important, doesn't
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 06:50:13PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Inserting from the same program which you use all day to browse
> Freenet is a big win. For a single document, it's probably the
> quickest way (especially if you don't dig commandline).
Yeah, perhaps.
> Most important, doesn't N
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 06:54:27PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:48:56PM -0500, Ed Onken wrote:
> > It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the
> > fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is
> > gone. Was this intentiona
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 06:54:27PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:48:56PM -0500, Ed Onken wrote:
> > It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the
> > fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is
> > gone. Was this intention
It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the
fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is
gone. Was this intentional? Is there any way to force the old fproxy
gateway page to appear?
Not that I ever used the gateway page for anything but a hand
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:48:56PM -0500, Ed Onken wrote:
> It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the
> fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is
> gone. Was this intentional? Is there any way to force the old fproxy
> gateway page to appe
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:48:56PM -0500, Ed Onken wrote:
> It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the
> fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is
> gone. Was this intentional? Is there any way to force the old fproxy
> gateway page to app
It took me a little while to realize that he's probably asking about the
fact that the insert capability of the old fproxy gateway page is
gone. Was this intentional? Is there any way to force the old fproxy
gateway page to appear?
Not that I ever used the gateway page for anything but a han
10 matches
Mail list logo
