On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On Monday 28 Jan 2013 21:39:54 Michael Grube wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On Monday 28 Jan 2013 18:09:07 Michael Grube wrote:
On Sun,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On Monday 28 Jan 2013 21:39:54 Michael Grube wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On Monday 28 Jan 2013 18:09:07 Michael Grube wrote:
On Sun,
I was thinking about the fact that we still build Freenet using the tools
that were available to us a decade ago, while the Java world has moved on
to more sophisticated dependency management tools like Maven.
I recall that the reason for not using Maven is that it doesn't operate
over a secure
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Ian Clarke i...@freenetproject.org wrote:
I was thinking about the fact that we still build Freenet using the tools
that were available to us a decade ago, while the Java world has moved on
to more sophisticated dependency management tools like Maven.
I
Old response that was never forwarded.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.dewrote:
Hi Snark,
Thank you for posting! Your analysis looks pretty good.
Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013, 00:02:17 schrieb Michael Grube:
Not bad! There is obviously still some
On Thursday 31 Jan 2013 17:50:32 Michael Grube wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Ian Clarke i...@freenetproject.org wrote:
I was thinking about the fact that we still build Freenet using the tools
that were available to us a decade ago, while the Java world has moved on
to more
On Thursday 31 Jan 2013 16:16:38 Michael Grube wrote:
So how exactly do you use the 0.037 constant?
If you don't have a peer with distance greater than 0.037 * (distance from
random location to nearest node to the random location), then you reset?
(This will break for nodes with very
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Michael Grube michael.gr...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Thursday 31 Jan 2013 17:50:32 Michael Grube wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Ian Clarke i...@freenetproject.org
On Thursday 31 Jan 2013 19:24:27 Michael Grube wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On Thursday 31 Jan 2013 16:16:38 Michael Grube wrote:
So how exactly do you use the 0.037 constant?
If you don't have a peer with
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Thursday 31 Jan 2013 17:50:32 Michael Grube wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Ian Clarke i...@freenetproject.org
wrote:
This is despite the fact that no such compromise as ever occurred on
any
On Thursday 31 Jan 2013 20:37:43 Ian Clarke wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Thursday 31 Jan 2013 17:50:32 Michael Grube wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Ian Clarke i...@freenetproject.org
wrote:
This is despite
Some strings that users hopefully will never see. But if they do see them, they
need to be clear. Any comments welcome.
RevocationKeyFoundUserAlert.text=The Freenet auto-update system appears to have
been compromized! A trusted member of the Freenet team has uploaded a special
signed message
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
But most importantly, we need it to be reasonably easy to *develop
Freenet
anonymously*. This is not a theoretical aspiration. There are anonymous
developers today, and some of them are extremely
The term blown is jargon, I don't think we should use it.
All messages should give the user guidance as to what course of action to
take, and what the implications of the various messages are.
Ian.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
Some
14 matches
Mail list logo
