On Sunday 28 July 2002 21:11, Matthew wrote:
CVS now is at version 489, and this includes code to always route to a
random key on the first hop, at oskar's suggestion. This hopefully will
have the following benefits:
a) prevents the network from splitting, sows it back together when/if it
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 09:29:07AM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote:
On Sunday 28 July 2002 21:11, Matthew wrote:
CVS now is at version 489, and this includes code to always route to a
random key on the first hop, at oskar's suggestion. This hopefully will
have the following benefits:
a)
maxRoutingSteps should not include steps rejected because they point
back to the requestor.
Pro:
Should prevent RouteNotFound, attempts were made to contact 0 nodes
Con:
Requests may get routed too far away from the ideal route.
This is in the new build 490.
Comments? Revocation notices? Flames
I have seen a claim (on FMB) that one person can see more with build 489
than he could before. I've also seen claims that the noderefs that are
available to a transient node behind a NAT firewall are different from
the noderefs that are available to a non-transient node tunneling
through a
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:37:19AM +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
I want the installer to see it's in a directory with lib/freenet.jar,
lib/freenet-ext.jar, and seednodes.ref, and then install using those
rather than downloading.
OK, let me summarize to see if I
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 05:13:59PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
maxRoutingSteps should not include steps rejected because they point
back to the requestor.
Pro:
Should prevent RouteNotFound, attempts were made to contact 0 nodes
Con:
Requests may get routed too far away from the ideal
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 12:19:37PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have seen a claim (on FMB) that one person can see more with build 489
than he could before. I've also seen claims that the noderefs that are
available to a transient node behind a NAT firewall are different from
the
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 12:19:37PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have seen a claim (on FMB) that one person can see more with build 489
than he could before. I've also seen claims that the noderefs that are
available to a transient node
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
I want the installer to see it's in a directory with lib/freenet.jar,
lib/freenet-ext.jar, and seednodes.ref, and then install using those
rather than downloading.
Anyway, this is essential to improving routing and anonymity by reducing
the number of nodes
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 11:50:54PM +0300, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
Freenet DOES NOT WORK behind a NAT firewall if you do not tunnel (by
port forwarding.) It does not work, period, transient or not.
Masquerading NATs do allow transient nodes to work
The Distribution Servlet now includes the Windows installer. You need to
set the following config options:
services=fproxy,nodestatus,nodeinfo,distribution
distribution.class=freenet.node.http.DistributionServlet
distribution.port=8891
distribution.allowedHosts=*
# assuming you want to
For any of you planning to attend DEFCON this weekend in Vegas, you can
see my pathetic attempt to fit a good overview of Freenet into a 50
minute time-slot at 5pm on Friday in the Privacy/Anonymity track.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Founder
12 matches
Mail list logo
