Re: [freenet-dev] Implemented random first hop

2002-07-30 Thread Mika Hirvonen
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Oskar Sandberg wrote: Masquerading NATs do allow transient nodes to work normally, though. NO! Don't tell me how it works - I wrote the code in question and the protcol specification. A Freenet node, transient or not, needs to be able to accept new TCP connections

Re: [freenet-dev] Implemented random first hop

2002-07-29 Thread Gianni Johansson
On Sunday 28 July 2002 21:11, Matthew wrote: CVS now is at version 489, and this includes code to always route to a random key on the first hop, at oskar's suggestion. This hopefully will have the following benefits: a) prevents the network from splitting, sows it back together when/if it

Re: [freenet-dev] Implemented random first hop

2002-07-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 09:29:07AM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote: On Sunday 28 July 2002 21:11, Matthew wrote: CVS now is at version 489, and this includes code to always route to a random key on the first hop, at oskar's suggestion. This hopefully will have the following benefits: a)

Re: [freenet-dev] Implemented random first hop

2002-07-29 Thread guardian
I have seen a claim (on FMB) that one person can see more with build 489 than he could before. I've also seen claims that the noderefs that are available to a transient node behind a NAT firewall are different from the noderefs that are available to a non-transient node tunneling through a

Re: [freenet-dev] Implemented random first hop

2002-07-29 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 12:19:37PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have seen a claim (on FMB) that one person can see more with build 489 than he could before. I've also seen claims that the noderefs that are available to a transient node behind a NAT firewall are different from the

Re: [freenet-dev] Implemented random first hop

2002-07-29 Thread Mika Hirvonen
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Oskar Sandberg wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 12:19:37PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have seen a claim (on FMB) that one person can see more with build 489 than he could before. I've also seen claims that the noderefs that are available to a transient node

Re: [freenet-dev] Implemented random first hop

2002-07-29 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 11:50:54PM +0300, Mika Hirvonen wrote: On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Oskar Sandberg wrote: Freenet DOES NOT WORK behind a NAT firewall if you do not tunnel (by port forwarding.) It does not work, period, transient or not. Masquerading NATs do allow transient nodes to work

[freenet-dev] Implemented random first hop

2002-07-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
CVS now is at version 489, and this includes code to always route to a random key on the first hop, at oskar's suggestion. This hopefully will have the following benefits: a) prevents the network from splitting, sows it back together when/if it does b) if you can't find a piece of data, then

Re: [freenet-dev] Implemented random first hop

2002-07-28 Thread Ian Clarke
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 02:11:19AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: CVS now is at version 489, and this includes code to always route to a random key on the first hop, at oskar's suggestion. This hopefully will have the following benefits: a) prevents the network from splitting, sows it back