[freenet-dev] Planned changes to keys and UI

2010-06-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
In git I have working support for a single encryption key for a whole splitfile. This reduces the size of the metadata for a splitfile by a factor of 2, and is part of the bundle of work I have been doing recently to try to get all the metadata changes out of the way at once so as to limit the

Re: [freenet-dev] Planned changes to keys and UI

2010-06-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 13:28:10 Matthew Toseland wrote: In git I have working support for a single encryption key for a whole splitfile. This reduces the size of the metadata for a splitfile by a factor of 2, and is part of the bundle of work I have been doing recently to try to get all

Re: [freenet-dev] Planned changes to keys and UI

2010-06-23 Thread Sich
Le 23/06/2010 21:01, Matthew Toseland a écrit : Insert a random, safe key This is much safer than the first option, but the key will be different every time you or somebody else inserts the key. Use this if you are the original source of some sensitive data. Very interesting for

Re: [freenet-dev] Planned changes to keys and UI

2010-06-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 20:33:50 Sich wrote: Le 23/06/2010 21:01, Matthew Toseland a écrit : Insert a random, safe key This is much safer than the first option, but the key will be different every time you or somebody else inserts the key. Use this if you are the original source of

Re: [freenet-dev] Planned changes to keys and UI

2010-06-23 Thread Evan Daniel
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Wednesday 23 June 2010 20:33:50 Sich wrote: Le 23/06/2010 21:01, Matthew Toseland a écrit : Insert a random, safe key This is much safer than the first option, but the key will be different every time

[freenet-dev] Planned changes to keys and UI

2010-06-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100623/c0df27a2/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Planned changes to keys and UI

2010-06-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
l be encrypted randomly like with option 2. [ KEY BOX ] -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100623/2d01f245/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Planned changes to keys and UI

2010-06-23 Thread Sich
Le 23/06/2010 21:01, Matthew Toseland a ?crit : > Insert a random, safe key > This is much safer than the first option, but the key will be different every > time you or somebody else inserts the key. Use this if you are the original > source of some sensitive data. > > Very interesting for

[freenet-dev] Planned changes to keys and UI

2010-06-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
f you need any specific functionality... > > sich -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100623/78e71a2a/attachment.pgp>