Re: [DDN] why not googlegroups - Re: The future of DDN

2009-02-25 Thread Andy Swarbrick
Steven, You are right about only taking across 25% as a guesstimate. Also it can split the group as one tries to leave the old group running and then it somehow has its own momentum (with perhaps the remaining 75%). Also anyone taking on board social networking would do well to understand the

Re: [DDN] why not googlegroups - Re: The future of DDN

2009-01-15 Thread Steven Clift
Anyone know how big the current membership is and whether the current system can export out member directory data? No matter where it moves to (if it needs to), asking people to move will only bring over 25 percent of the folks. Whether it is GroupServer installed at http://groups.dowire.org or

Re: [DDN] why not googlegroups - Re: The future of DDN

2009-01-13 Thread Don Cameron
Claude Almansi wrote: Yes, the e-mail list is stifled. But isn't it because people hesitate to post to it because they don't know when the post will get through? Yes - and another silent witness here :-) I tend not to contribute to DDN for the above reason, however still follow discussions

Re: [DDN] why not googlegroups - Re: The future of DDN

2009-01-02 Thread Claude Almansi
] Subject: [DDN] why not googlegroups - Re: The future of DDN To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group digitaldivide@digitaldivide.net Date: Wednesday, 31 December, 2008, 11:51 AM hi all first of all a happy new year to everyone hope 2009 gives us a good ddn why not just