[digitalradio] Re: Straight talk on JT65a

2007-04-21 Thread Vojtech Bubnik
Hi Leigh. The callsigns are source encoded into 28 bits, the grid in 15 bits. This gives 71 bits total for 2 callsigns and a grid. If the same information is exchanged by 6 bit letters of Contestia, 94 bits will be nescessary. That gives coding gain of 10*log(94/71)=1.21dB supposing the same baud

[digitalradio] Path Simulator tests -- JT65A vs Olivia and others

2007-04-21 Thread Tony
All: I used Pathsim to compare the sensitivity of JT65A vs MFSK, PSK31 and OLIVIA using AWGN to alter the SNR. I ran direct-path with no ionospheric disturbance. The chat modes decoded with error-free print down to -12 to -14db SNR. The JT65A mode decoded at -27db SNR (signal inaudible).

[digitalradio] S/N Multipsk figures -- JT65A vs Olivia and others

2007-04-21 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello to all, Comparizon with S/N Multipsk figures. According to JT65 specifications, this mode decodes with few errors down to -23 dB, with a normalized band of 2.5 KHz. All Multipsk figures are normalized with a band of 3 KHz. -23 dB in 2.5 KHz is about -24 dB in 3 KHz band (-23.792 dB

Re: [digitalradio] S/N Multipsk figures -- JT65A vs Olivia and others

2007-04-21 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Patrick, Are you thinking about incorporate J65A in Multipsk? It would be great LA5VNA Steinar Patrick Lindecker wrote: Hello to all, _Comparizon with S/N Multipsk figures._ According to JT65 specifications, this mode decodes with few errors down to -23 dB, with a normalized

Re: [digitalradio] 12M Deep Search/ Straight talk on JT65a

2007-04-21 Thread John GM4SLV
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:20:49 -0400 Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like Shetland John's idea about deep search work on 12 or 10 M. I think I will give it a try tomorrow on 12 and see what I come up with. Will check prop charts for best time to north of John O' Groats... Andy

Re: [digitalradio] S/N Multipsk figures -- JT65A vs Olivia and others

2007-04-21 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Steinar, The problem in JT65 is that the important part of the Reed Solomon coding/decoding (RS tables...) is not described. Moreover, it is writen in the JT65 specifications (about RS decoding): it is based on a research paper by Ralf Koetter and Alexander Vardy and uses computer code

[digitalradio] FSK441 mode :Random QSO Hour 21/4/07

2007-04-21 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I am not sure if the UTC time is correct since the announcement says 8 AM it might be 1200 UTC, not 1300.. Andy -- Forwarded message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 21 Apr 2007 10:57:41 - Subject: [wsjtgroup] Random QSO Hour 13:00 - 15:00 UTC Meteor

[digitalradio] Re: S/N Multipsk figures -- JT65A vs Olivia and others

2007-04-21 Thread Brian A
I'm perplexed by the edited dB figures. On JT65A HF it doesn't make any sense that the values are -5 or -6 db when the signal is strong and moving the S-meter to s5 or s6. Here we use a 300Hz filter and the audio output is adjusted to read about 0db with no signal. What I would have expected is

Re: [digitalradio] 12M Deep Search/ Straight talk on JT65a

2007-04-21 Thread John GM4SLV
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:32:25 +0100 John GM4SLV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to try CQ on 24.910 (DF 0hz) on Fist Minute for most of the day while I'm around the house. I don't expect to be overwhelmed with a pile up! My simple station at the moment is IC706mk2g, set to ~20w on the

Re: [digitalradio] 12M Deep Search/ Straight talk on JT65a

2007-04-21 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I'm not sure which Shetland island you are on John, I checked the Lerwick market web cam but did not see you out doing your shopping. I will try you later. Andy K3UK On 4/21/07, John GM4SLV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:32:25 +0100 John GM4SLV [EMAIL

Re: [digitalradio] 12M Deep Search/ Straight talk on JT65a

2007-04-21 Thread John GM4SLV
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:37:31 -0400 Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure which Shetland island you are on John, I checked the Lerwick market web cam but did not see you out doing your shopping. I will try you later. Andy K3UK Hi Andy, Just returned and see absolutely no

Re: [digitalradio] 12M Deep Search/ Straight talk on JT65a

2007-04-21 Thread Andrew O'Brien
John, name is Andy and am in FN02hk . I have been monitoring 12M while watching footy on the telly but just checked and see no received signals from anyone on 12M. I will transmit for a while and see if anyone picks me up. Andy. On 4/21/07, John GM4SLV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat,

Re: [digitalradio] 12M Deep Search/ Straight talk on JT65a

2007-04-21 Thread John GM4SLV
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:58:12 -0400 Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John, name is Andy and am in FN02hk . I have been monitoring 12M while watching footy on the telly but just checked and see no received signals from anyone on 12M. I will transmit for a while and see if anyone picks

Re: [digitalradio] Re: S/N Multipsk figures -- JT65A vs Olivia and others

2007-04-21 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello brian, The S/N referenced to a bandwidth is used to compare modes under a noise environment criteria. A minimum S/N of 0 dB means that with an equal power (let's say 1 watt) of signal and noise (noise distributed over a 3 KHz band so with a density of 0.33 W/KHz), the signal transmitted

Re: [digitalradio] 12M Deep Search/ Straight talk on JT65a

2007-04-21 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi John I have be monitoring 24.910 almost the hole day with no luck, but I was able to work South Africa on 40meter (7.045 USB) with my 12 m dipole right now. The antenna is about 8 meter above the ground and I was using 75W. 193700 3 -21 0.1 -8 3 * LA5VNA ZS6WAB KG461 10

[digitalradio] Re: S/N Multipsk figures -- JT65A vs Olivia and others

2007-04-21 Thread Brian A
Thank you Patrick for the explanation. No doubt the mode has solid theoretical resons for what it edits. Intercomparing various digital modes has some merit-- like for a Ph.D thesis or marketing. However as a user, the present value edited isn't a number that is too useful. It apparently

[digitalradio] MFSK16 pictures , much ado about nothings ?

2007-04-21 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Now that images are legal to transmit (in the USA) and MFSK16 is set for this in MixW and Multipsk, I wonder if it has been determined useful ? I rarely hear/see any use of this function. . -- Andy K3UK Skype Me : callto://andyobrien73 www.obriensweb.com

Re: [digitalradio] MFSK16 pictures , much ado about nothings ?

2007-04-21 Thread Roger J. Buffington
Andrew O'Brien wrote: Now that images are legal to transmit (in the USA) and MFSK16 is set for this in MixW and Multipsk, I wonder if it has been determined useful ? I rarely hear/see any use of this function. . -- Andy K3UK Skype Me : callto://andyobrien73 callto://andyobrien73

[digitalradio] RTTY: ALC with FSK ?

2007-04-21 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I'm used to AFSK RTTY and keeping the ALC to a minimum. What about FSK RTTY I notice my current settings produce a moderate amount of ALC readings. -- Andy K3UK Skype Me : callto://andyobrien73 www.obriensweb.com

Re: [digitalradio] RTTY: ALC with FSK ?

2007-04-21 Thread Jose A. Amador
Andy, I think it does not matter. RTTY has no envelope and nonlimear amplifiers (Class C, etc) can be used with it. Watch the ALC only for modes with an envelope, ie PSKxx. 73, Jose, CO2JA Andrew O'Brien wrote: I'm used to AFSK RTTY and keeping the ALC to a minimum. What about FSK RTTY I

[digitalradio] Re: MFSK16 pictures , much ado about nothing ?

2007-04-21 Thread Andrew O'Brien
-Thanks Roger and Leigh, How much SNR is needed to get a good picture on a typical HF band? Andy -- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew O'Brien wrote: Now that images are legal to transmit (in the USA) and MFSK16 is set for this in MixW

Re: [digitalradio] 12M Deep Search/ Straight talk on JT65a

2007-04-21 Thread John Bradley
I was at work all day, but monitored 24910 from about 1400Z to Z . some consistent activity on a couple of different DF's, but nothing decoded into a callsign Can do the same tomorrow John VE5MU

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Deepsearch on JT65 HF --turn it off

2007-04-21 Thread w6ids
Hello Cesco... I am assuming the file is created automagically by the software. What's the purpose of the date? Should I go in and edit the file manually? Howard W6IDS Richmond, IN - Original Message - From: cesco12342000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent:

[digitalradio] Problem with SpecJT

2007-04-21 Thread Kevin O'Rorke
First a bit of brag. This afternoon on 20m 041300 1 -8 -0.1 -13 3 * CQ ZS6WAB KG461 10 041500 7 -6 -0.1 -11 3 # VK5OA ZS6WAB KG46 OOO 1 10 041700 10 -9 -11 4 RRR ? 041900 3 -8 -0.2 -11 3 * -16DB TU 30M

[digitalradio] 7Mc JT65 Frequency

2007-04-21 Thread Kevin O'Rorke
In Andy's excellent Bozo's Guide the suggested operating frequency on 40 for JT65 is 7076. Here in this part of the world 7050 - 7100 is the main SSB operating area and 7075 is a very popular mobile SSB operating frequency. So we would, by Gentleman's agreement not operate JT65 on 7076 Main