On 9/27/07, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my personal experience, JNOS first, and Linux in second place, have
You probably mean Linux kernel-mode AX.25, since JNOS runs fine on Linux =)
been a fairly good match to the radio channel characteristics for e-mail
and web browsing over
Robert Thompson wrote:
You probably mean Linux kernel-mode AX.25, since JNOS runs fine on
Linux =)
Yes, I meant EXACTLY that. Kernel AX.25 can be fooled to endless repeats
by TFPCX and an inadequate computer (say, a 286 running some terminal
ughh !!) That has been a factual case for
In my personal experience, JNOS first, and Linux in second place, have
been a fairly good match to the radio channel characteristics for e-mail
and web browsing over AX.25 packet radio.
How is that?
Well, JNOS has tweaked timers, or better stated, the ability of
setting channel access
It could be that either I am misreading the information, or the
information is too old and was superseded by a change in the proposed 3G
MIL-STD-188-141B Appendix C, messaging protocol. I am referring to one
of E. Johnson's documents where he writes:
The use of standard
internet applications
Hi Rick,
That reference is to Government/Military HF e-mail topology which has
evolved to the STANAG 5066 standard pretty much across the board,
however not everyone is there yet due to costs and time to update
their network infrastructures. STANAG 5066 can basically be thought
of as what
OK but how about the question I had?
Are you saying that 3G will include the MIL-STD-188-141A 8FSK125
waveform as the method for linking? Or it won't?
When you use the term ALE, do you mean the related
MIL-STD/FED-STD/STANAG protocols, or do you mean the linking part only,
particularly
Rick;
please let me know where you and Sholto are using FAE ARQ, since I would like
to come amd play,too.
On the subject of ALE; in my humble opinion some operators have become too
focused on ALE, forgeting that ALE is the means to establish which stations
available, and the best frequency
John,
As I was preparing an assessment of my experiences last night with
Sholto (that I published on the HFDEC group), I needed to look up the
URL for the 30 meter spotting website and noticed that Sholto was
monitoring on FAE this late morning/early afternoon. So I tuned up on
his QRQ of
I had very good luck testing FAE with Sholto, KE7HPV yesterday evening.
The 8FSK125 waveform is a fairly old design. They would not be using FSK
if they were developing a new mode. From what I have been reading, the
government/commercial long term plan for the MIL-STD/FED-STD/STANAG's
will
Hi Rick,
Patricks FAE ARQ is an excellent protocol, it is the best example to
date in my opinion of a PCSMD based ARQ protocol developed for Amateur Radio.
The ALE 8FSK is not being replace by serial tone modem use for its
Sounding/LQA/Calling/Linking, believe me that is not going to happen.
Like so many things in life, there are tradeoffs and ALE is not all that
bad, but it is also not all that good either. Rud's comments are
accurate, unless you ignore what the military/commercial/government
actually writes about ALE.
When I first read about ALE in QST many years ago, beginning
: Saturday, September 22, 2007 11:35 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] ALE yes ... or no?
...
I have been spending a LOT of time researching the studies of ALE and
the standards from the company claims. Many of these are computer
simulations and not real world tests
12 matches
Mail list logo
