Re: [digitalradio] Do we need a separate group for JT65A?

2007-04-10 Thread John Becker
I would say no. Same thing happens every time a new mode comes along. Hang in there is all will be over soon. John, W0JAB moderator At 10:03 AM 4/10/2007, you wrote: Or is the message volume going to die down after everybody here has worked everybody on all bands?

Re: [digitalradio] Do we need a separate group for JT65A?

2007-04-10 Thread Danny Douglas
- Original Message - From: jhaynesatalumni [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 11:03 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Do we need a separate group for JT65A? Or is the message volume going to die down after everybody here has worked everybody on all bands

Re: [digitalradio] Do we need a separate group for JT65A?

2007-04-10 Thread w6ids
, 2007 11:15 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Do we need a separate group for JT65A? Isnt this the reason for the group? If we had a separate group for every mode, there would be dozens of sites we woudnt even be aware of, and it would drag none of us into researching the modes ourselves. If the mode

Re: [digitalradio] Do we need a separate group for JT65A?

2007-04-10 Thread Jose A. Amador
tongue_in_cheek Maybe what we need is a new group for PSK31 and RTTY. Those are mature modes, and people who doesn't want to wouldn't be forced to bother about innovation. /tongue_in_cheek Jose, CO2JA jhaynesatalumni wrote: Or is the message volume going to die down after everybody here

Re: [digitalradio] Do we need a separate group for JT65A?

2007-04-10 Thread John Bradley
A. Amador To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 10:43 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Do we need a separate group for JT65A? tongue_in_cheek Maybe what we need is a new group for PSK31 and RTTY. Those are mature modes, and people who doesn't want