/?yguid=341090159
- Original Message -
From: obrienaj
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:01 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
but Dave, ...how would we define get the job done. I might feel I need to
transfer my message
/Wide Slow/Narrow
but Dave, ...how would we define get the job done. I might feel I need
to transfer my message at 9600 baud on HF but others might argue I should
be patient and accept a 300 baud transfer.
Andy
What we really need
is a rule that says you should use the minimum
DOUGLAS
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 4:39 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
That is exactly the question. The next person may say that 9.6 is too slow
for him. We refer back to the speed limit on road, and knowing human nature
Message -
From: DANNY DOUGLAS
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 4:39 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
That is exactly the question. The next person may say that 9.6 is too slow
for him. We refer back to the speed limit
Message -
From: DANNY DOUGLAS
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
Back to the anology. Auto (ground based) speed have nothing to do with
aircraft speeds. Aircraft were developed off-road
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
The problem with worrying about people interfering with this hobby, you
have to narrowly define this hobby.
OK, staying with your analogy, we'd have to set surface
Digital_modes
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159
- Original Message -
From: Dave Sparks
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
The problem with worrying about
but Dave, ...how would we define get the job done. I might feel I need to
transfer my message at 9600 baud on HF but others might argue I should be
patient and accept a 300 baud transfer.
Andy
What we really need
is a rule that says you should use the minimum bandwidth needed to get
- Original Message -
From: obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 7:01 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
but Dave, ...how would we define get the job done. I might feel I need
to transfer my message at 9600 baud
