Re: [digitalradio] Pactor versus Olivia

2007-01-10 Thread Rich Mulvey
Andrew O'Brien wrote: I actually had my first Pactor QSO today, there was a ham calling CQ on 40M Pactor 1 FEC. After working him via Pactor, we tried to compare Olivia versus Pactor going down to 1 watt, both were 100% copy. We were about 100 miles apart. What BW/tones were you using

Re: [digitalradio] Pactor versus Olivia

2007-01-10 Thread KV9U
Rich and group, I have read from the SCS website that there is still throughput with P2 and especially P3 when down to maybe as low as -16 db below noise. Others have claimed that Pactor 2 and 3 drastically drop off by the time you reach -5 db S/N such as KN6KB's RFfootprints powerpoint on

RE: [digitalradio] Pactor versus Olivia

2007-01-10 Thread DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Pactor versus Olivia Rich and group, I have read from the SCS website that there is still throughput with P2 and especially P3 when down to maybe as low as -16 db below noise. Others have claimed that Pactor 2 and 3 drastically drop off by the time you reach -5 db

Re: [digitalradio] Pactor versus Olivia

2007-01-10 Thread Jose A. Amador
%40yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of KV9U Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 3:12 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Pactor versus Olivia Rich and group, I have read from the SCS website that there is still throughput with P2

Re: [digitalradio] Pactor versus Olivia

2007-01-07 Thread Roger J. Buffington
Andrew O'Brien wrote: I actually had my first Pactor QSO today, there was a ham calling CQ on 40M Pactor 1 FEC. After working him via Pactor, we tried to compare Olivia versus Pactor going down to 1 watt, both were 100% copy. We were about 100 miles apart. -- Andy K3UK Skype Me :