Thanks Jeff, that helps a lot.
Dan
--- On Sun, 8/29/10, Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, August 29, 2010, 9:51 PM
Dan,
The TH-F6A DOES NOT have a modem
.
Again Thanks,
Dan
--- On Sun, 8/29/10, Jerry W k0hzi...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jerry W k0hzi...@gmail.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, August 29, 2010, 7:58 AM
Dan
- Original Message -
From: KB3FXI
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 2:03 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New guy
Jon,
Excellent explanation! You should be a teacher (if you aren't already).
And, Stephen... welcome to the hobby and digital modes
I just realized that I made reference in my post to the 756 having good digital
rig control capabilities, but in fact the OP said that the radio is an Icom
765, not a 756.
I have no idea what digital rig control the 765 is capable of.
Sorry about that.
Jon
KB1QBZ
I have a LOT to digest!! I thank both of you for the detailed (and that is what
I needed!) answers. THANKS to you both!
Steve
KJ4SLK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KB3FXI kb3...@... wrote:
Jon,
Excellent explanation! You should be a teacher (if you aren't already).
And,
Some of your questions are sort of which taste better -- apples or oranges?
and you may get all sorts of different answers depending on personal
preference. I'll give you some of what I believe are the differentiating
factors. I'll also tell you my personal decisions but they are mine and
Jon,
Excellent explanation! You should be a teacher (if you aren't already).
And, Stephen... welcome to the hobby and digital modes.
Here's my personal preference with some elaboration:
Interface: USB Signalink
USB Signalink has an on board sound card so you don't have to tie up your
Chuck,
I will do my best to make the HamFest. Thanks for the info.
Steve
KJ4SLK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, charles standlee ac5p...@... wrote:
Steve,
Welcome to digital communications... Since you live in Louisiana here are a
couple of sites that you may want to look at, first
I use the free method of the FCC.
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=home
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:18 AM, John Becker, WØJAB
w0...@big-river.netwrote:
What does one have to do to re-new their ticket on-line
now? Been so lone I forgot
--
Mr.C.Robinson
73 DE KF6NFW
And if you are an ARRL member, they will do it for you free.
73 Buddy WB4M
What does one have to do to re-new their ticket on-line
now? Been so lone I forgot
http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
Chat, Skeds, and Spots all in one (resize to suit)
Facebook=
Of J. Moen
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 1:30 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RE-NEW LICENSE
John,
There is an FCC Registration Number (FRN) associated with your call. You
need the FRN and a password to logon to FCC's Universal Licensing System
(ULS).
Go to http
Smooth as baby's bum.
--
From: Dave AA6YQ aa...@ambersoft.com
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 2:37 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] RE-NEW LICENSE
I just renewed my license via ULS, as described below. I had an FRN
At 11:52 AM 7/17/2010, you wrote:
And if you are an ARRL member, they will do it for you free.
73 Buddy WB4M
Thanks buddy, and yes, a life member
Do I need to do anything or is this an automatic happens thing they do?
John, W0JAB
HOT STICKY Missouri.
Q How do you know it's summer in
Regulatory Fee and a $5 ARRL processing fee.
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RE-NEW LICENSE
At 11:52 AM 7/17/2010, you wrote:
And if you are an ARRL
Do any Old Buffers in the UK remember the original Ros, the one by the name of
Edmundo Ros ? He used to have a small band, had a half hour a week on the old
BBC radio and his band played at social gatherings where the young rich and gay
used to dance the hours away.
Mel G0GQK
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 08:46:18PM -, raf3151019 wrote:
Do any Old Buffers in the UK remember the original Ros, the one by the
name of Edmundo Ros ? He used to have a small band, had a half hour
a week on the old BBC radio and his band played at social gatherings
where the young rich and
On 6/19/2010 9:28 AM, aa777888athotmaildotcom wrote:
Skip,
I looked at your patent and could not believe my eyes. You patented a
tone detector and a beeper. One could have argued that it covered the
original beeper pager. You could have owned the entire paging market
(or did you?). Amazing
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, AA0OI aa...@... wrote:
HI Bob:
That LSB on 40 usb on 20.. a bunch in there on 40 right now
Garrett / AA0OI
What is the best time CDST, day/night to look for digital sstv activity on 7173?
Thanks,
Jerry - K0HZI
shape right now and hope
it will open up later this afternoon...
Garrett / AA0OI
From: Jerry W k0hzi...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 11:22:07 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New to SSTV
--- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Wes Linscott w1...@... wrote:
The EPC PSK125 contest was in operation. Is that possibly what you were
seeing/hearing?
Wes W1LIC
Well if PSK125 signals are clicky then that's just as bad as if
it's FSK. However I was able to copy one or two of the
Still does not have enough COM port selections...
Al/ W8AII
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, nietorosdj nietoro...@... wrote:
Download here: http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
And configure the Email menu
Hi, where do you go to download the software?
Thanks--- Bob C WU9Q
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, nietorosdj nietoro...@... wrote:
Please download the latest version.
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:w...@mchsi.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:33 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta
Hi, where do you go to download the software?
Thanks--- Bob C WU9Q
Q Will this work with Simon Browns new sdr software ?
G ..
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Siegfried Jackstien
siegfried.jackst...@... wrote:
Another one out in the market . nice and cheap .. Performance tests??
Dg9bfc
Sigi
_
Von:
Brian, take a look at this: http://garage-shoppe.com/wordpress/?p=85#comments
I've gotten comments from other customers by email, and some posted in the
soft-radio group, but I won't quote private comments without permission and
haven't sought it yet. There have been a couple of issues that
The better the soundcard, the better the results will be as with any
soundcard-based sdr. I use a Creative SB-1090, which you can get for $50 - $80
if you shop around, and I am very satisfied. I have not tried one of the
high-end cards, but understand the performance might be even better.
This shows I am ranked number 1 among digitalradio ! That is because I am the
only digitalradio member to participate.
RankCal1 16080 60 40 30 20 17 15
12 10 6 4 2 70 Total Slots Range
1 K3UK3
obrienaj wrote:
This shows I am ranked number 1 among digitalradio ! That is because I am
the only digitalradio member to participate.
You are still at the top of the league Andy...
RankCallsign160 80 60 40 30 20 17
15 12 10
I guess that's because you Andy are the only one that I know
of that try's *every* new mode that comes down the pike.
I guess I really need to take a good look at some of the newer
sound card modes. I just got so turned off by that do nothing
PSK 31.
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
I guess I really need to take a good look at some of the newer
sound card modes. I just got so turned off by that do nothing
PSK 31.
The various WSJT modes can be quite entertaining, especially if you are
into VHF and UHF and JT65 is gaining support on HF as well.
I use Ham Radio Deluxe mainly. I have Skysweeper but havnt used that in a
while. I think it does Stanag 4539.
73
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Siegfried Jackstien
siegfried.jackst...@... wrote:
Maybe stanag 4285
. Used by military
. Tune to 1875 usb don´t know the
submode or i fit
...@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von clive_2e0bsl
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 00:28
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [digitalradio] Re: New to the group
I use Ham Radio Deluxe mainly. I have Skysweeper but havnt used that in a
while. I think it does Stanag 4539.
73
Good summary about the properties of the different digi-modes. I really like it
and have just forwarded the link to some other fellows (and I have just deleted
the different files with the information Tony has published here before).
However: I don't follow his conclusion about the mode to
I bought myself one for Christmas too !! (Hey ! - I am Santa Klaus,
aren't I ? !! ).
What I would like to know (it hasn't been delivered yet!), is how good
members of the Group think that it will be effective and suitable for
working in Digi Mode. (at 25 GB Pounds - 37 US Dollars).The
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Juergen dl...@darc.de wrote:
Good summary about the properties of the different digi-modes. I really
like it
Thank you for your kind comment
However: I don't follow his conclusion about the mode to choose for rag
chew qso's: Based on my experience with a
It will probably work well. His feedback score is good so it must be at least
Ok on performance. The only reason I went with the Signalink was to gain more
throughput on Winmor. My Blaster and use of a motherboard soundcard served me
well on many different modes for several years and this
-standards.htm
http://www.cetest.nl/rtte_directive.htm
Remember Hilberding?
Cortland
KA5S
- Original Message -
From: Music Maker
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 1/2/2010 11:56:51 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New digital interfaces for Christmas
I bought myself one for Christmas too
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi all
I am whispering on 60m @ 5.2872 Dial with 5W.
I'm still on 80M from yesterday when some friends of mine, who don't
have 5MHz permits, wanted to try the program out.
I will probably return to 60M today, but will be RX only when I have to
go out.
Cheers -
I'm getting out
4 spots:
Timestamp
CallMHz SNR Drift GridPwr ReporterRGrid km
az
2009-11-20 01:36K3UK10.140193 -20 0 FN02hk
5 AC7SM DM26ie 3142269
2009-11-20 01:36K3UK
Hi all
I am whispering on 60m @ 5.2872 Dial with 5W.
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
obrienaj wrote:
I'm getting out
4 spots:
Timestamp
Call MHz SNR Drift GridPwr ReporterRGrid km
az
2009-11-20 01:36 K3UK10.140193 -20 0
Or you can try SSTV on 20m : 14.230 MHz USB
My SSTV cam is stand by 24/7: http://www.pd4u.nl/sstv.php
Marc, PD4U
I adjusted my VOX and can now run PSK250. So will satay with PSK250 as the
default but can change if people request via sked page.
Andy K3UK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, obrienaj aobri...@... wrote:
Thanks to Rein's hard work, I now have a PSKMAIL Server active. I think it
is
Please post your question to the yahoo group NBEMSham.
There are several elmers on that group that can help you with your problem.
Thanks.
Dave, W1HKJ
fldigi developer
-
_
From: dl8le dl...@darc.de
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 8:07:32 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New 40m Band Plan
The IARU should try to coordinate the different interestes of the ham
Thanks Tony!
So far, MT63 was the only mode that wouldn't decode when saved as an MP3. I
figure it was an example where enough loss from the compression made it useless.
Saving as a raw WAV file worked flawlessly. All the other modes (so far!)
worked fine saved as an MP3.
f
to be excessive.
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: F.R. Ashley gda...@...
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New version of Mixw
My 2 cents worth:
I have tried them all and still prefer MixW. It is a simple
Hi Andy,
Is there any likelihood of future MixW development, for example adding
Patrick's RSID or CALL-ID features? I get asked this myself and can't answer
as I'm not on any MixW mailing lists.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
Nothing that I have heard. Nick is somewhat more active, as his
health has improved, but I hear that the focus of Mixw improvement is
on the logging aspect.
Andy
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Simon (HB9DRV)simon.br...@kns.ch wrote:
Hi Andy,
Is there any likelihood of future MixW
Hi,
It's good to hear Nick is better - long time no news.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
Nothing that I have heard. Nick is somewhat more active, as his
health has improved, but I hear that the focus of Mixw
What is the attraction of MixW now that we have so many other multimode
digital programs that are freely available with one program even open
source and cross platform?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Andy obrien wrote:
Nothing that I have heard. Nick is somewhat more active, as his
health has improved,
Rick W wrote:
What is the attraction of MixW now that we have so many other multimode
digital programs that are freely available with one program even open
source and cross platform?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Rick, nearly all members of Texas Army MARS and Region 6, are using
MixW. idly
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, chas ch...@... wrote:
Rick W wrote:
What is the attraction of MixW now that we have so many other multimode
digital programs that are freely available with one program even open
source and cross platform?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Rick, nearly all
MixW has (I think) support for the data modes used by satellites - that's
one thing I would like to support.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: jhaynesatalumni jhhay...@earthlink.net
What am I missing?
jhaynesatalumni wrote:
No, let's get back to Rick's question and ask what it is about
MixW that you find to be superior to everything else out there.
I downloaded a trial version of MixW long ago and wasn't impressed
enough to want to go further with it. What am I missing?
I can't speak for
chas,
What are the MARS operators using MixW for? Are there modes that are not
available on other programs that they find compelling?
I downloaded MixW again today, but it looks about the same as it did in
past years. It is a fairly clean interface (albeit, that is a subjective
thing for an
I think MARS uses MixW mostly for MT63. Here in South Carolina, in Navy
MARS, we are standardizing on using fldigi for MT63, and before that
some people used MixW and some used Nino's program. It all boils down to
whicher user interface is easier to use, or to train people to use. If
everyone
My 2 cents worth:
I have tried them all and still prefer MixW. It is a simple program yet
does everything I want it to. It is neat and orderly in layout and
appearance. It will use my RAC CD, a lot of logging programs won't. I
just click on a callsign and the logging info fills right
It is all about the visual simplicity of its interface . . . elegant in its
minimalism. And I say that truly as a complement. Although I like HRD and
MultiPSK both for other reasons, MixW is easier to use. More pleasing to the
eyes especially versus MultiPSK.
Rick - KH2DF
Sent from my iPhone
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New version of Mixw
My 2 cents worth:
I have tried them all and still prefer MixW. It is a simple program yet
does everything I want it to. It is neat and orderly in layout and
appearance. It will use my RAC CD
I think that as a digital mode application, MixW is good , but it
has lagged seriously behind other applications in the past 2-3 years.
The DX cluster operations are no-where near as good as Winwarbler
affords via the Spotcollector interface, or the opportunities DM780
has provides via HRD's
Buddy and Rick,
What you are describing seems to be flidigi more than any other program.
Have you tried this program? And unlike Windows-only programs, fldigi
works on more platforms than any other program of its type. Maybe the
RAC CD won't work on fldigi though.
Fldigi is ultra clean and
to the program.
73 Mark KQ0I
--- On Mon, 6/15/09, Charles Brabham n5...@uspacket.org wrote:
From: Charles Brabham n5...@uspacket.org
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New version of Mixw
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, June 15, 2009, 7:51 PM
MixW has
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien k3uka...@... wrote:
http://mixw.net/files/MixW219b5.zip
Andy K3UK
I should mention that this is an UPDATE with new web cluster link, you need the
full version already installed. DX Summit is now used as the basis for the web
cluster
Has there been any further progress on this mode?
Regards
Kevin, ZL1KFM.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:56 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New amazing JT65-HF
and of course the modes works well
there been any further progress on this mode?
Regards
Kevin, ZL1KFM.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:56 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New amazing JT65-HF
and of course the modes works well, here is my brief 80M
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... wrote:
Hi Andy
Any news about JT65-HF?
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Steinar, I think an official release from the author W6CQZ is still a few weeks
away. My beta version has been quite stable and I use it exclusively now
OK, thanks Andy
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland saa...@... wrote:
Hi Andy
Any news about JT65-HF?
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Steinar, I think an official release from the author W6CQZ is still a few
weeks
Hi Andy
Any news about JT65-HF?
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Thanks for the information, actually a good idea. Believe we used to have our
original FeldHell club net in that area or up from there a bit; not a heavily
used band slice usually, but might need to dodge some Winlink Pactor I and II
stuff.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In
Good idea, but the first thing I'd recommend is to use something besides the
PCALE software as your screenshot on the forum!
f, k2ncc
?
Regards
Kevin, ZL1KFM.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 5:56 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New amazing JT65-HF
and of course the modes works well, here is my brief 80M monitoring around
0400 today
Call
Andrew,
Any news when this digital mode might be out to use?
Regards
Kevin, ZL1KFM.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 5:56 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New amazing JT65-HF
and of course the modes
Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] wrote:
Andrew O'Brien skrev:
and of course the modes works well, here is my brief 80M monitoring around
0400 today
Call #Times heard
N9GUE3
W7YES7
ZS6WN3
N9DSJ10
Notice that South African was heard,
Abdy K3UK
--- In
Yes, there IS a Linux version
see
http://www.w6cqz.org/?p=152
Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] wrote:
And of cause the classical question from those of us who live in a
Micro$oft-free zone: Will there be a Linux version?
Or, better yet, documentation of the JT65 modulation
schemes, so JT65* can be added to existing radio
programs like fldigi.
--
All rights
I think it is open, already in three different applications
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Rik van Riel r...@surriel.com wrote:
Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] wrote:
And of cause the classical question from those of us who live in a
Micro$oft-free zone: Will there be a Linux version?
Or, better
We have been very fortunate to have Tony, K2MO's detailed lab testing to
figure out which modes work under different conditions and it has been
surprising, and actually a bit disappointing, because most digital modes
can only tolerate a small amount of ISI and Doppler.
I recently thought of
and of course the modes works well, here is my brief 80M monitoring around 0400
today
Call #Times heard
N9GUE 3
W7YES 7
ZS6WN 3
N9DSJ 10
Notice that South African was heard,
Abdy K3UK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien k3uka...@... wrote:
I was able to see
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick W mrf...@... wrote:
Truthfully, Christian, my goal is to find the modes that work the best
under different conditions. There are not that many.
It's also difficult, in my experience, to find a lot of objective
analysis of the modes on the Internet.
I
From a purely nostalgic viewpoint some of the older MFSK modes like
Piccolo, Coquelet Crowd could be a lot of fun to use on the amateur
bands. Performance-wise they are probably eclipsed by MFSK16/Olivia
but
just as in Hellschreiber even CW, performance isn't everything.
Nostalgia would be
Thanks for the info Bonnie, I was hoping that region 1 and 2 would now share
the same narrow band mode segment.
What is now happening is that many of the narrow band mode operators in region
2 are moving in to the segment suggested by the region 1 band plan. Maybe
region 2 will make a change.
Thanks for the info Bonnie, I was hoping that region 1 and 2 would now share
the same narrow band mode segment.
What is now happening is that many of the narrow band mode operators in region
2 are moving in to the segment suggested by the region 1 band plan. Maybe
region 2 will make a change.
Rick N6RK wrote
What are these comments based on? They are not
consistent with the April QST article. Do you
know something the ARRL doesn't know or isn't telling?
Hi Rick,
The April 2009 QST article by Brennan N4QX, is
good, and it provides a feel-good positive spin
back story on
I would love to try Piccolo
Andy K3UK---
In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Christian Crayton n5...@... wrote:
If you could experiment with a mode for the first time, would you rather
try a new mode like Thor, or an old-school mode like CROWD or Piccolo?
I've been thinking about fiddling
Hi all
There is some MFTT activity on around 14.075 now
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Norbert Pieper wrote:
Hi Paul,
try the new MFTT 3.0.150_Beta it now has a simple FEC in a way that
single damaged characters are suppressed. They will no longer damage
the sync of the whole word.
Do not
Hello Steinar, Norbert and all the others:
On 80 mtrs 3.590 usb and up, there is also MFTT activity now.
Saw ON, OK and OH around 20.00 utc.
I have the impression that some stations are still using the old
version without FEC, but that will change soon.
Norbert:
My first impression of the new
Hello Norbert,
Yes ok about tuning in, in the first Test I was doing only the
transmitting
Last night I heard a MFFT station on 80 meters and it was Yussi OH7TE.
The signal strength was about s-6 with QSB, so a pretty good signal
and I had no problem tuning in and decoding the signal at
Hi Paul and the rest
I am testing MFFT with some local HAM here. I am running a beacon
(double) in MFFT on 14.075 now.I will let it be one for about 20min
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
pa0ocd wrote:
Hello Norbert,
Yes ok about tuning in, in the first Test I was doing only the
transmitting
Hi Paul,
try the new MFTT 3.0.150_Beta it now has a simple FEC in a way that
single damaged characters are suppressed. They will no longer damage
the sync of the whole word.
Do not expect a wonder, but it will help a bit.
I had to double the pause between the words to be able to distinguish
: [digitalradio] Re: New to the Group
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, clarkmvimi clarkmv...@... wrote:
Good day. I am new to the group and digital modes. My name is Steve
Clark V73CS and I am located in the Marshall Islands. I am wanting to
setup a digital station here. I have
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, clarkmvimi clarkmv...@... wrote:
Good day. I am new to the group and digital modes. My name is Steve
Clark V73CS and I am located in the Marshall Islands. I am wanting to
setup a digital station here. I have someone sending me an AEA 232
MBX for my
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New MFTTY Version 30.145
HI,
I have just downloaded this program and installed it on my radio computer.
Problem, when I run it after installing I get the error message Run-time
error '372'
Failed to load control 'RichTestBox' from RICHTX32.OCX. Your
dear buddy
just go on the spot page (chatpage) and there you can find others to test with
greetz
dg9bfc
sigi
dear howard
answers are intermitted in your txt
To All,
I did download the new release and found a couple of things.
Pressing the Appointments button takes me to K3UK's page but there's no way to
post comments or log in.
If I instead go to my Favorites and select the page, I can log in and
Well, I don't see the problem if the Tower of Babel is getting larger
and larger. I think diversity is crucial to innovation.
I find it satisfactory to play with new modes, and I have to play with
them to find out what the
advantages are (..) over previous modes .
My thanks to all of you
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New MFTTY Version 30.145
Well, I don't see the problem if the Tower of Babel is getting larger
and larger. I think diversity is crucial to innovation.
I find it satisfactory to play with new modes, and I
DTMF tones are easy to distinguish for us OT's. Maybe not so easy for
new digital hams, but and that might be a useful characteristic as long
as it can compete well against the existing modes of which we have many,
some with not that much difference in performance.
A couple days ago I started
sigi
- Original Message -
From: Rick W
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New MFTTY Version 30.145
DTMF tones are easy to distinguish for us OT's. Maybe not so easy for
new digital hams
100%agree
dg9bfc
sigi
- Original Message -
From: kh6ty
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New MFTTY Version 30.145
There is always a search for a Holy Grail of digital modes for ham radio,
with ease
100%agree
dg9bfc
sigi
- Original Message -
From: Steinar Aanesland
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New MFTTY Version 30.145
Well, I don't see the problem if the Tower of Babel is getting larger
1 - 100 of 370 matches
Mail list logo
