-
From: John Bradley
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: Obstination (was Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz
FreqCoordination Info)
Amen Jose;
Seems all the stateside operators want to do is argue.
Is the plan to go back
Seems all the stateside operators want to do is argue.
Is the plan to go back to the fundementals of this group, or do we
set up a new one where policy arguments would be punted?
John VE5MU
Fellows, injecting national slurs into *any* ham radio discussion is a
spectacularly bad idea.
Hey I'm one of the first to complain about WINLINK knocking out a QSO, and it
is usually during a DX contact that it happens
What I can't understand is the constant complaining about big bad old winlink,
with the arguments going around and around.
I don't have to operate in the middle of the
The WinLink folks have run a long and effective campaign of
disinformation. They claim that most of the QRM caused by WinLink
PMBOs either is the fault of a WinLink user who called on a busy
frequency, or isn't really QRM because the victim was running
panoramic reception and thus had his or
Dave Bernstein wrote:
..
So why don't we just not operate in the middle of automatic
stations and shut up, as you suggest? Two reasons:
1. unattended automatic stations with a bandwidth of 500 hz or less
can run anywhere in the data bands, so there is no safe frequency
2.
John,
We have gone over some of this a number of times, but perhaps you missed
it. The Winlink 2000 programmer abandoned further work on the SCAMP mode
because there is mostly one programmer as they don't work with many
other hams on this. The have a closed view of the system and has been
Sorry to hear about your system being on a holiday from digital radio.
There is no Winlink 2000 organization that you can work from within. It
is basically a closed group of maybe half a dozen (at most) owners. They
dictate all the terms to the amateur community and tell us how we are
Amen Jose;
Seems all the stateside operators want to do is argue.
Is the plan to go back to the fundementals of this group, or do we set up a new
one
where policy arguments would be punted?
John
VE5MU
--
