Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ARRL Offers Alternate Approach to Regulation by
Bandwidth
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
no the ARRL will pay with loss of 90
-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ARRL Offers Alternate
Approach to Regulation by
Bandwidth
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
no the ARRL will pay with loss of 90% of its members
... they will see just how many unhappy hams
Usually, I can follow this stuff pretty well, but for some reason, I am
missing just what is the change that ARRL made to their original proposal?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Dave Bernstein wrote:
This was just posted:
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/03/23/101/?nc=1
73,
Dave,
UTC
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL Offers Alternate Approach to Regulation by
Bandwidth
Usually, I can follow this stuff pretty well, but for some reason, I am
missing just what is the change that ARRL made to their original proposal?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Dave Bernstein wrote
Dave,
Oh, that's great Dave!. Thanks a lot, partner. (HI)
Not that it's not an excellent proposal, mind you, but the
HSMM modes cover BRUCE's personally owned AM Worldwide
6M Calling spot @ 50.4 MHz!
I am the destroyer of worlds! (The Hunt for Red October?)
So now Bruce will be on constant
no the ARRL will pay with loss of 90% of its members
... they will see just how many unhappy hams are out
there come renewal time .
ENJOY YOUR BAND all 12 of you .
im done ..
It was my understanding that the ARRL compromised on 3.5 kHz for SSB
voice when they submitted the request to the FCC. I think that ESSB
accomodation was part of that reasoning? Can anyone else recall that
initially they were proposing 3.0 and then moved it to 3.5?
Or is it now that they want
The initial proposal was 3.5 kHz bandwidth for any mode within certain HF band
segments.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: kv9u
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 00:56 UTC
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL Offers Alternate Approach
