Thanks for the info on HF Packet. My friend is not licenced yet so he cant TX
but wants to check it out. Thanks again73BarryWB1EDI
_
Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect.
No...I was thinking of his actually using the program to connect to a BBS. I
should have made that clear.
73 Mark
--- On Wed, 2/4/09, Jose A. Amador ama...@electrica.cujae.edu.cu wrote:
From: Jose A. Amador ama...@electrica.cujae.edu.cu
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] HF packet
To:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Mark Milburn markk...@... wrote:
Yes, there are a LOT of repeats when the bands are poor. Signal
strength is not the only criteria. I don't have a technical
background to explain it or even understand it, but there are plenty
of days when a signal of S7
Okay,
I now have an 'attach multipsk ...' command on my JNOS system,
and a receiver process to handle the incoming data.
So NOW the fun part begins. How do *we* want to do this ?
It's very easy for me to make it so that we can use JNOS + multipsk
modem to pass RAW ip over HF - I already have a
Hi Mark,
I am not sure why any legal issues are involved. To my knowledge there
has been only one major mode that has been prohibited by the FCC. Even
AM is still grandfathered, however it is also true that if AM was used
extensively, there would be a groundswell to have to eliminated due to
I believe that nowadays 110 baud (or 100 baud) should fare better.
Sadly, PAX only passes unproto in Multipsk as modem (but maybe UI
packets are enough for TCPIP)
I would have to reinstall JNOS and try with Multipsk.
73,
Jose, CO2JA
Mark Milburn escribió:
No...I was thinking of his
We have been talking about using Q15x25 but it turns out to be more talk than
doing so we haven't really done much. I think it's quite possible using FBB or
MSYS and then using MixW as the TNC. That way you have the error correction of
the bbs program and the ability to vary the Q15x25 for a
maybe patrick can builtin such a mailbox without stuck on packet :-)
why not a mailbox that can be used with ANY mode maybe also with arq and
fec
dg9bfc
sigi
- Original Message -
From: maiko4
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 7:15 PM
Hello Mailko,
Glad you connect the TCP/IP link (in local loop I suppose).
I know that there is a KISS interface for AX25 (packet), but I
understand that it's limited to serial port only. I'd like to use
the tcp/ip control of multipsk to pass AX25 (similar to how I do
the RAW ip above).
With
All,
I'm QRV MFTTY 14072.0 1/2 speed FEC mode. Its 20:15z -- February 5th.
Tony - K2MO
Hello Sigi,
There is yet a modest mailbox for ARQ (Packet/Pax/FAE) modes (as the messages
must be error free).
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Siegfried Jackstien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio]
Hello Patrick,
However, I could change the TCP/IP multipsk protocol
to send/receive Kiss frames
That would be very nice (if you think it's an okay idea).
This will be easy. It's just a matter of passing incoming
kiss frames to an existing KISS handler function. It will
take no time at all
Rick,
You can try Q15X25 if you have MixW and can find someone else to
experiment with.
See http://www.mixw.net/index.php?j=downloads for the .dll file
instuctions.
KE7HPV.
Rick W wrote:
I meant to bring up Q15X25 since this was going to be the solution for
HF packet a number of years
PAX and PAX2 can only handle the 6 bit ASCII character set. We would
need at least a 7 bit ASCII character set for upper and lower case,
control characters, etc. If you only wanted to use it for something like
standard message traffic though it could be implemented since you can
then use it
All,
Had another opportunity to test MFTTY on air today. As expected, sensitivity
goes hand-in-hand with character speed and the slower 1/8 mode is probably
close to what you might expect from say PSK31.
Path simulations seem to indicate that the mode is probably more stable than
PSK31 when
I am set up with Q15X25 tonight. Anyone willing to test this? 20 meters
seems to be shutting down so maybe 40 meters (7088?)
Also, is there any way for Tony, K2MO, to test this mode with his
computer model so we can determine the limits of its ISI, Doppler, and
sensitivity?
73,
Rick, KV9U
16 matches
Mail list logo
