Re: Re[2]: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-04 Thread Dr. Howard S. White
ina, 2003 San Diego Fires, 911" - Original Message - From: Flavio Padovani To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 9:59 AM Subject: Re[2]: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network Saludos Dr.,I str

Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread Danny Douglas
, March 02, 2006 11:59 PM Subject: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network This announcement should really stir up some new rantings from the Anti-Everything Forces... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2006/03/02/5/?nc=1 Have fun

Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread Dr. Howard S. White
From: Danny Douglas To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 8:03 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network I think that is just fine, and a perfect example of where and when something like Wi

Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread John Becker
I totally disagree ! At 10:03 AM 3/3/06, you wrote: I think that is just fine, and a perfect example of where and when something like Winlink could and should be used. Outside the amateur bands. If the government wants hams to be involved in emergency communications they should do the same:

Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread Danny Douglas
PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network I totally disagree ! At 10:03 AM 3/3/06, you wrote: I think that is just fine, and a perfect example of where and when something like Winlink could and should be used. Outside the amateur bands

Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread John Becker
Everything in blue. And just why do you think it should be used outside of the ham bands? Got something against traffic handling? At 11:39 AM 3/3/06, you wrote: You totally disagree with what? Both that it is a good mode to use Outside our bands, or that is should be used outside and not

Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread Danny Douglas
for practice. - Original Message - From: John Becker To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 12:53 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network Everything in blue.And just why do you think

Re[2]: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread Flavio Padovani
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com DHSW DHSW Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 8:03 AM DHSW DHSW Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: ArmyMARS Implementing DHSW Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network DHSW DHSW DHSW I think that is just fine, and a perfect exampleof where DHSW and when something

Re: Re[2]: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Looks like Steve has worked hard on the project. Good luck Steve. Andy K3UK Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band