I would also like the ALE and digital community to
recognise that they share the bands with everyone else
Dave (G0DJA)
Hi Dave,
While I can't speak for the whole digital community,
I can probably speak with some authority for
the ALE community...
ALE operators have been sharing the
During an emergency, no one has a problem ceding frequencies to emcomm
stations; its like heading for the shoulder when you hear an ambulance while
driving.
When there's no emergency underway, however, the automatic bands are
available to all amateur stations, not just unattended stations. Its
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:21 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: HF International Automatic Subbands
I would also like the ALE and digital community to
recognise that they share the bands with everyone else
Dave (G0DJA)
Hi Dave,
While I can't speak
When there's no emergency underway, however, the automatic bands are
available to all amateur stations, not just unattended stations. Its no more
acceptable for unattended stations to QRM ongoing QSOs in the automatic
bands than it is to QRM them anywhere else within the amateur spectrum.
!
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message -
From: aa6yq
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:34 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: HF International Automatic Subbands
During an emergency, no one has a problem ceding frequencies to emcomm
My recollection is that the discussions leading to the creation of the
automatic sub-bands included expressions of the same concerns that continue to
surface here: an operator in California who activates an unattended station in
Denver can't know that the unattended station will QRM an ongoing
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of David Struebel
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:50 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF International Automatic Subbands
Bonnie,
Just a point... I don't believe the HF automatic sub bands
