Re[2]: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-26 Thread Vlad_UA6JD
Today evening will testing use RSID on 14073 +/- QRM from 16z Welcome Vlad UA6JD

Re: Re[2]: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-26 Thread pshabasgo
]: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!   Today evening will testing use RSID on 14073 +/- QRM from 16z Welcome Vlad UA6JD

Re: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-25 Thread Charles Brabham
: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE! I was monitoring PSK on 20 meters today with DM780 V5.0 Beta when a window pops up in the lower right corner of the screen that says, MFSK32 transmission on 2632 Hz. Click here to select. I had never heard of MFSK32 before so I clicked on the window

Re: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-25 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
FWIW SSTV has been using VIS (slightly similar) for ~ 10 years or so, maybe more. Simon Brown, HB9DRV www.ham-radio-deluxe.com - Original Message - From: Charles Brabham This is interesting in light of all the claims by WinLink and ALE aficianados that that comprehensive

Re: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-25 Thread Alan Barrow
Charles Brabham wrote: This is interesting in light of all the claims by WinLink and ALE aficianados that that comprehensive signal-detection is 'impossible'. Painting with an awfully wide brush, there. :-) You won't find most of the ALE folks I run with saying it's impossible. Just not

Re: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-25 Thread Jose A. Amador
The difference here is that a helper signal has been added, same as with SSTV, but which is only sent at the start of the transmission. That is essentially different from the raw, bare signal with no ID. A new situation, to be fair. 73, Jose, CO2JA Simon (HB9DRV) escribió: FWIW SSTV has

[digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-23 Thread aa777888athotmaildotcom
aa777...@... To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:33 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE! You know what's really exciting? We are a hop, skip and jump away from a powerful, lightweight ALE implementation that would probably outperform MIL-STD

Re: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-22 Thread Phil Williams
Also, would it not be beneficial to have something like this implemented in the the unattended Pactor stations. A physical convergence layer for all. 73 philw de ka1gmn On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:33 AM, aa777888athotmaildotcom aa777...@hotmail.com wrote: You know what's really exciting?

RE: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-22 Thread Dave AA6YQ
[mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of aa777888athotmaildotcom Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 10:34 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE! You know what's really exciting? We are a hop, skip and jump away from a powerful, lightweight ALE

Re: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-22 Thread Patrick Lindecker
/The_Call_ID_and_Prop_ID_easy_with_Multipsk.doc given a 2 second RSID transmission length 1.4 seconds precisely. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: aa777888athotmaildotcom aa777...@hotmail.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:33 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID

[digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-21 Thread nf2g
I have yet to receive an RSID burst on any digital CQ. 73 de Dave, NF2G