Re: [digitalradio] Re: identify this mode?

2008-12-08 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Tooner I am sorry but, I don't know . I am only using ham software, and my favorite is multipsk http://f6cte.free.fr/index_anglais.htm 73 de LA5VNA Steinar Tooner wrote: LA5VNA Steinar Thank you VERY much for that assistance! Is there any less expensive software that does what

Re: [digitalradio] Re: identify this mode?

2008-12-07 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Tooner A friend of mine used his software from HOKA to analyze your sound file. It is a Dataplex transmission alias globe wireless network http://www.hoka.com/code300-32/gwdataplex.htm Sound: http://signals.taunus.de/WAV/GW-CH-FREE.WAV http://signals.taunus.de/FFT/GW-CH-FREE.HTML 73 de

[digitalradio] Re: identify this mode?

2008-12-07 Thread Tooner
LA5VNA Steinar Thank you VERY much for that assistance! Is there any less expensive software that does what CODE300, RS Argus, Sorcerer, etc. can? I'm guessing that's asking too much. I sure would like to be able to do what you had your friend do! Anyway, thanks again! f, k2ncc

[digitalradio] Re: identify this mode?

2008-12-06 Thread Tooner
No one in the group can ID this mode? f

Re: [digitalradio] Re: identify this mode?

2008-12-06 Thread Jose A. Amador
Well, I have not tried MP3 saving and decoding, since I KNOW it supresses redundancies for the ear as a way to achieve LOSSY compression. Avoiding it makes sense to me, as MP3 mangles the spectrum with its algorithm. But, as you say, it may not be entirely the case. While experimenting with

[digitalradio] Re: identify this mode?

2008-11-30 Thread Tooner
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's OK for aural reference, but a .wav cilp is required for decoding. Jose, I gave thought to what you said and it makes sense. The 'aural reference' and screenshot is good, but the ability to decode is even

[digitalradio] Re: identify this mode?

2008-11-15 Thread Tooner
No zip, just MP3.