[digitalradio] Re: illinoisdigitalham?

2009-02-18 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I am guessing that it was taken down due to violation of Yahoo rules. Several people have written to me privately complaining about what they perceived as violations. I refrained from doing anything because the group was in some sense a competitor to my digitalradio group. Competition is good,

Re: [digitalradio] Re: illinoisdigitalham?

2009-02-18 Thread Jose A. Amador
Some members of another group I am a member too felt harrassed and sent a protest. Sometimes we got too many announcements and no real news, so it became tiresome. Most mails were pdf's with large detailed images, which was quite a burden for slow modems. 73, Jose, CO2JA --- Andrew O'Brien

[digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: [psk31] Global Emergency Network Marks Record

2008-11-23 Thread David Struebel
Just for the record... My original comments were made tongue in cheek But for the record NTS Digital operates 24/7 on 80, 40, 30, 20, 17, and 15 meters... There are mutiple stations that do this, again primarily dedicated to NTS traffic... Some of the delivery points are made through

Re: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: [psk31] Global Emergency Network Marks Record

2008-11-23 Thread Howard Brown
]; Dave Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dan Ostroy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dale Sewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Benson Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 8:22:53 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: [psk31] Global Emergency Network Marks Record Just

Re: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: [psk31] Global Emergency Network Marks Record

2008-11-23 Thread David Struebel
- Original Message - From: Howard Brown To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 2:19 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: [psk31] Global Emergency Network Marks Record Hello David, I would like to ask what type of traffic

Re: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: Power Mask for Bandwidth Rules - USA

2007-12-31 Thread John B. Stephensen
31, 2007 14:25 UTC Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: Power Mask for Bandwidth Rules - USA At one time the ARRL published plans for class B modulators with no filters. What they publish will stay with the times. There is no reason higher order analog filters can

Re: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: Power Mask for Bandwidth Rules - USA

2007-12-30 Thread W2XJ
Modern filters that have been used in real equipment since the 80s can be -1 db at 3100 and down 25 db at 3.5 k with negligible overshoot and ripple in the 10ths of a DB. Chebyshev filters are not really the filter of choice for this, elliptic tilers with some custom tweaks are a better

Re: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: Power Mask for Bandwidth Rules - USA

2007-12-30 Thread John B. Stephensen
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 23:16 UTC Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: Power Mask for Bandwidth Rules - USA Modern filters that have been used in real equipment since the 80s can be -1 db at 3100 and down 25 db at 3.5 k

[digitalradio] RE: [illinoisdigitalham] ARRL Withdraws Regulation by Bandwidth Petition, Plans to Refile

2007-04-27 Thread John Champa
Mathew, I don't think the League is trying to control anything. My guess is that the FCC simply isn't buying the concept! Perhaps it looks too much like an enforcement nightmare. 73, John - K8OCL Original Message Follows From: Matthew Genelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL