jean-christophe manciot wrote
3) It is not always possible for the bug reporters to hand over their
original file(s), for many different reasons that are beyond the scope
of this thread (confidentiality, legal concerns and so on...).
I do not consider these reasons beyond the scope of this
On 08/11/2014 05:06 AM, Owen Genat wrote:
jean-christophe manciot wrote
3) It is not always possible for the bug reporters to hand over their
original file(s), for many different reasons that are beyond the scope
of this thread (confidentiality, legal concerns and so on...).
I do not consider
Let some moderate heat melt your ice field.
--
Jean-Christophe
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List
Hi All,
I have found that asking for a document is the best way to get closest
to what the user is experiencing and what they are writing the bug for.
If they report the bug on windows, i load up windows to confirm it and
then also check if its on linux as well. Sometimes the steps to
reproduce
Hi,
just to quickly expand on that:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 02:35:43PM +0200, Sophie wrote:
I believe it is always possible for the checkers to trust the
reporters and follow the steps to reproduce on their own material
first; if they can't do that, they probably should ask
I also replied to this off list. We are consistent and that's good ;)
Ultimately, we're not going to change our workflow. It's up to a user to
report with clear steps and a simple test document - else it's just a
waste of our time. Glad we all think alike :-D
Best,
Joel
On 07/14/2014 05:38 PM,
