Re: Topic of board-discuss list (was: [tdf-discuss] Re: Rules of Procedure approved for TDF board of directors)

2012-10-01 Thread Pedro
Thorsten Behrens wrote terribly sorry if we ever gave that impression. Admittedly, the entry on http://www.documentfoundation.org/contribution/ was worded like that (Public discussions of the Board of Directors), but I'm rather certain it should read List for focused interaction of the public

Re: Topic of board-discuss list (was: [tdf-discuss] Re: Rules of Procedure approved for TDF board of directors)

2012-10-01 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Pedro wrote: I'm not sure that is the idea. Otherwise you would not get the following message when you try to post to that list on Nabble Authorized Users Only Only authorized users can proceed in this area. You can use the form below to send a request to the administrators. Access

Re: Topic of board-discuss list (was: [tdf-discuss] Re: Rules of Procedure approved for TDF board of directors)

2012-10-01 Thread Pedro
Thorsten Behrens wrote No idea - if you subscribe via board-discuss+subscribe@ , you can post w/o moderation, like on every other TDF mailing list. Nabble misconfiguration? It is not a misconfiguration. It is a different configuration. I think you are misinterpreting the words Public

Re: Topic of board-discuss list (was: [tdf-discuss] Re: Rules of Procedure approved for TDF board of directors)

2012-10-01 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
I guess what Thorsten means is that in the case of the board discuss list Nabble might be misconfigured. Jean Weber and David Nelson posted on it less than a month ago, so at least it works with the standard mailing list usage. Besides the BoD always intended to make this list a list where members