Re: [tdf-discuss] Addons

2011-01-04 Thread Michael Wheatland
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote: Michael Wheatland wrote (04-01-11 02:59) If everyone was as clear and concise as you there would be no confusion about any issues. No, to me this is an obvious example of someone apparently unable to understand, Please do

Re: [tdf-discuss] Addons

2011-01-04 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Michael, 2011/1/4 Michael Wheatland mich...@wheatland.com.au On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote: Michael Wheatland wrote (04-01-11 02:59) If everyone was as clear and concise as you there would be no confusion about any issues. No, to me this is an

Re: [tdf-discuss] Addons (was: Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format)

2011-01-04 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello Michael, 2011/1/4 Michael Wheatland mich...@wheatland.com.au On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Hello Michael, Le Tue, 4 Jan 2011 01:26:09 +0930, Michael Wheatland mich...@wheatland.com.au a écrit : On Tue, Jan 4,

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format

2011-01-04 Thread Jesper Lund Stocholm
Hello Charles (et al), 2011/1/3 Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org: Barbara, Le Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:55:21 -0600, Barbara Duprey b...@onr.com a écrit : On 1/3/2011 3:06 AM, Davide Dozza wrote: Il 02/01/2011 20:41, Charles-H. Schulz ha scritto: [...] Well, the

RE : Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format

2011-01-04 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Jesper, We are not interested in OOXML, a standard that became one only after a campaign of deception and unacceptable pressures driven by Microsoft. We are interested in ODF, an open standard developed by many players including Microsoft. We are only offering convenience to our users by letting

Re: [tdf-discuss] Addons

2011-01-04 Thread Ian Lynch
On 4 January 2011 07:37, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote: Michael Wheatland wrote (04-01-11 02:59) If everyone was as clear and concise as you there would be no confusion about any issues. No, to me this is an obvious example of someone apparently unable to understand, Hm, has anyone

Re: [tdf-discuss] Addons (was: Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format)

2011-01-04 Thread Ian Lynch
Silverstripe site is that they don't understand the CMS and are not really interested in learning it. It is true, once you use Drupal, you will never install another CMS. That seems to me an important consideration long term. If there is likely to be more and longer term committed developer

Re: [tdf-discuss] Do not support writing to OOXML format

2011-01-04 Thread Johannes A. Bodwing
Hi Ian, ... And they are not equal. That's my problem with it at the moment. I don't really understand how this democratic-meritocratic principle works. And what you explain below with Microsoft, for me it is not meritocratic or democratic that's an ethical aspect. Democracy means that

Re: RE : Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format

2011-01-04 Thread Jesper Lund Stocholm
Hello Charles, 2011/1/4 Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org: Jesper, We are not interested in OOXML, a standard that became one only after a campaign of deception and unacceptable pressures driven by Microsoft.  We are interested in ODF, an open standard developed by many

Re: [tdf-discuss] Do not support writing to OOXML format

2011-01-04 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Johannes, all, Le Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:34:42 +0100, Johannes A. Bodwing jo...@arcor.de a écrit : Hi Ian, ... And they are not equal. That's my problem with it at the moment. I don't really understand how this democratic-meritocratic principle works. And what you explain below with

[tdf-discuss] Re: Addons

2011-01-04 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2011-01-04 04:30, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit : As for Marc's earlier message: the decision was to use Silverstripe. Trying to get around it by pointing out that more volunteers want to work on a different CMS overlooks two things: - the legitimity of the decision : you basically claim that

Re: [tdf-discuss] Just make the damn thing work! (was Re: Dictionary Syncing)

2011-01-04 Thread Rogerio Luz Coelho
In Brazil the leading dictionary is VERO (BrOffice's - LibreOffice default) the only one that ships with most of our new orthography ... so it IS possible for FOSS to bring a BETTER thing to the table, we in Brasil are no longer running AFTER MSO , we are seing them at our rear mirror ;) Rogerio

Re: [tdf-discuss] Test documents to compare interoperability [was: Do not support writing to OOXML format]

2011-01-04 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2011-01-02 7:26 PM, Bernhard Dippold wrote: But as this mail is buried under a huge discussion, she/he should start a new thread, ask for co-workers, define the test documents and help us all with the results. As I have suggested many times in the past, there needs to be a *dedicated* place

[tdf-discuss] Re: Just make the damn thing work! (was Re: Dictionary Syncing)

2011-01-04 Thread Marc Paré
Hi Rogerio: Le 2011-01-04 17:50, Rogerio Luz Coelho a écrit : In Brazil the leading dictionary is VERO (BrOffice's - LibreOffice default) the only one that ships with most of our new orthography ... so it IS possible for FOSS to bring a BETTER thing to the table, we in Brasil are no longer

[tdf-discuss] Fwd: [marketing] Search at the beginning

2011-01-04 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung
Hello all, FYI, Just let LibO search documents from the beginning by default. +1 -- Forwarded message -- From: Sean Haynes s...@keokee.com Date: Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:40 AM Subject: [marketing] Search at the beginning To: d...@marketing.openoffice.org To speed things up –

Re: [tdf-discuss] Fwd: [marketing] Search at the beginning

2011-01-04 Thread Augustine Souza
So long as the search backwards is retained. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung vuhung16p...@gmail.comwrote: ...Just let LibO search documents from the beginning by default. +1 -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive:

Re: [tdf-discuss] Fwd: [marketing] Search at the beginning

2011-01-04 Thread Rogerio Luz Coelho
2011/1/5 Augustine Souza aesouza2...@gmail.com So long as the search backwards is retained. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung vuhung16p...@gmail.com wrote: ...Just let LibO search documents from the beginning by default. +1 I think the search should be from the

Re: [tdf-discuss] Fwd: [marketing] Search at the beginning

2011-01-04 Thread todd rme
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Rogerio Luz Coelho luz.roge...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/1/5 Augustine Souza aesouza2...@gmail.com So long as the search backwards is retained. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung vuhung16p...@gmail.com wrote: ...Just let LibO search documents from

Re: [tdf-discuss] Fwd: [marketing] Search at the beginning

2011-01-04 Thread Andy Brown
On Tue Jan 04 2011 19:39:29 GMT-0800 (PST) todd rme wrote: On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Rogerio Luz Coelho luz.roge...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/1/5 Augustine Souza aesouza2...@gmail.com So long as the search backwards is retained. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung