-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 09:17 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
Why add something more to bloat the package when an extension already exist?
Probably because the person wants something that works. And the
extension you suggest does not work.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2011 01:27 PM, drew wrote:
A requirement to have to have a US bank account in order to receive funds is
not the same thing as saying the money must be dispersed in the US only, is
it?
No.
A couple of things to do, before setting up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/08/2011 04:36 PM, BRM wrote:
Why resort to deception and Microsoft-esque tactics to promote LO?
FWIW, it isn't uncommon for 501(c)3 organizations to have a for-profit
organization operating at an arm's length. Microsoft-esque only if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2011 13:03, Christophe Strobbe wrote:
3. Implement grammar checking.
This is one of the most requested features for OOo.
It also has been available since OOo 1.1.3, for half a dozen languages.
In all instances, you are better off using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2011 10:38, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Seeing as android is linux based, i honestly dont think it would be that hard.
Browsing through the Android Store, I found two apps that claimed to be
be able to edit ODF files.
One of them relies on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/04/2011 00:05, MiguelAngel wrote:
to waste the efforts to get Libo or OOo runing in Android or similar, and use
in a four-six inches windows, for to do what?
My little android device has more RAM, more file storage space, a faster
chip, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2011 22:11, Denny wrote:
When pointing out competitors, there are a lot more I think.
One I would add to the list is
Softmaker Office (http://www.softmaker.com)
Looking at the app marketplace for my Android device.
* Documents To Go;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/04/2011 14:56, Mike Hall wrote:
long documents, I personally came across only 2 instances of genuine MSO bugs.
I guess it is a feature that when I used MSO 2010 with Win7, the mean
time till seeing the BSOD was under 100 seconds. I guess it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/2011 10:59, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
I have a statement from Thinkfree, that they will support ODF in the next
version.
I'll believe that _after_ the next version is released.
With ThinkFree, their claims and the actuality are, in my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/04/2011 21:23, Robert Derman wrote:
My prime example, the word list in the spell checker is PATHETIC!!!
It is fairly easy to toss out the built in spell checker, and replace it
with something that is more suitable for your organization's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/2011 07:59, lj wrote:
Capitalizing Letters in LibreOffice.
Format Change Case
Options are:
* Sentence Case;
* Lower Case;
* Upper Case;
* Capitalize Every Word. (This should be renamed to Title Case);
* Toggle Case;
* Half Width;
* Full
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/2011 11:58, aqualung wrote:
that with MSO97 on Win2K mean time to BSOD was just on 60 minutes.
That's odd. Don't have MSO 2010, but with MSO 2007 under Windows 7 I have
It doesn't matter which version of windows with which version of MSO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2011 18:19, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
http://tomtasche.at/p/OpenOffice%20Document%20Reader#article
That program has not opened any of my ODT documents.
Reading the marketplace comments, it looks like it can only open
documents that are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/04/2011 03:40, Jon Hamkins wrote:
There are roughly one billion words in the English language. You could
Actually, there are only about one million English words in English, and
You are right. That billion words is the size of the corpus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/2011 03:29, Larry Gusaas wrote:
Someone makes money any time an ad is clicked on. That is contrary to the
spirit of using open source software.
Open Source Software is about LIBRE.
Gratis is completely and utterly irrelevant to FLOSS.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/2011 08:44, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
It is OK if it has a paypal or whatever donate link to explicitly
cover the costs of running the server (but it must be clear that this
You do realize that the organization that puts up the donation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/04/2011 16:03, Ian Lynch wrote:
Those reliant of distant web servers without no knowledge of data security
employed by service providers are being naive.
Most people are not going to worry about it if it works for them and is more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/06/2011 15:25, Jim Jagielski wrote:
now options open and available to LOo and OOo that, until
a week ago did not exist. Maybe some of those long-term
The major, if not only option is that one can now contribute code
directly to IBM, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/06/2011 15:00, Jim Jagielski wrote:
A formal, legal foundation. The ASF is a recognized 501(c)3, non-
TDF might not have 501(c)(3) status, but then consider that it is
incorporated in Germany, not the United States.
More pointedly, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/06/2011 10:48, Sam Ruby wrote:
of the code that they are willing to share the burden of maintenance
with the larger community.
You do realize that IBM will _NOT_ contribute any code to Apache
OpenOffice don't be.
I have to wonder where the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2011 13:25, Jim Jagielski wrote:
that his mind is made up, whether based on reality or not.
The reality is that IBM employees wearing their IBM hats, have made it
crystal clear on the general@incubator list that IBM is going to force
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henri wrote:
The circumstances being what they are, would not the best path for ASF to
take(as seems to me to be the case) be to accept the grant (in the event
Oracle is offering it *nulla condicione astrictus*)
Assuming that Oracle is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/06/2011 15:36, Florian Effenberger wrote:
can review and incorporate them, at the same time translating into German for
our lawyer.
When I was reading German law on non-profits, my impression was the
By-Laws had to specify how members of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/06/2011 15:31, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
How exactly would that work. So far the discussion was about moving code
around, but what about generating code for both?
As a practical matter, the code would have to modified to work as
expected
On 19/06/2011 11:34, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Over at Apache, we found compliance quick and easy [1][2][3]
I'm not sure compliance for LibO is as simple and straightforward as you
imply.
For starters, code, amongst other things, that is either from, or
benefits users in North Korea, Cuba,
On 18/06/2011 09:39, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
The spirit does go well beyond the letter.
Ideally, the 'git repositories' should be what everyone gets, rather
than a source code snapshot that has no source change history.
A couple of years ago I sent a question to FSF about meeting source code
On 24/06/2011 00:30, Antonio Olivares wrote:
I like the idea, don't get me wrong.
+1
it is hard for developers out there to make just a viewer when some other
folks have that :( already.
This is the type of project that might be more suitable for the Apache
Software Foundation.
My $0.04
On 07/28/2011 04:21 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
All that I see know for sure is that it took 5 years and the code
still is not in the repo.
IBM claims that since it was in an OOo 1.1.x branch, it was in the repo,
and that it is Sun's fault that it wasn't incorporated into OOo 2.x, or
OOo
On 07/30/2011 01:33 PM, e-letter wrote:
Why wouldn't users simply keep an old version of m$?
a) The old version of M$ won't run on their current operating system;
b) The license for the old version of M$ expired;
jonathon
--
If Bing copied Google, there wouldn't be anything new worth
On 07/30/2011 01:35 PM, e-letter wrote:
Such people should be buying m$;
Your false assumption is that M$ provides a version of MSO for the
platform that is being used.
if they cannot afford m$ why are they in business???
Possibilities include:
* Startup;
* The office-suite is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/11/11 11:14, Pedro wrote:
I'm wondering if the recent offer for download of the add supported limited
edition of Microsoft Office Starter is a reaction to the improving quality
Microsoft has been experimenting with various low-cost/no-cost to
On 6/21/2014 11:30 AM, Terrence Enger wrote:
I have heard about OCR,
OCR usually manages to remove all presentation markup. It can also
remove sentence, and paragraph differentiators.
From my POV, if the content is in PDF format, and the person needs
another format, they can OCR it.
On 12/05/2016 19:02, Joel Madero wrote:
> would dedicate hundreds of hours (or thousands) for such a small amount of
> money.
If the cited amount was one thousand dollars, United States currency,
then one is looking at the going rate on fiver for that size book.
If the quoted amount was ten
Корень Зла wrote:
>add to writer this Open Book XML format for operate.Sometimes i need a Epub
>and FB2 features in Write
An extension which exports Write documents to FB2 can be found at
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/ooo-fbtools.
The LibreOffice Extension site was down, so I
On 08/11/2016 18:08, Hugo Alejandro wrote:
> do you know if WPS Office documents are officially supported in LibreOffice?
> Thank you
Where does installing an extension that does the file import/export fit
into the equation?
jonathon
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
On 09/11/2016 11:54, GwenDragon wrote:
> Please read Bug 35538 - "Writer does not remember formatting (font
> selection) with complex font families"
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35538
I have a theory about why that bug occurs.
Give me a couple of days to fix my laptop,
On 09/11/2016 03:30, Hugo Alejandro wrote:
>> Where does installing an extension that does the file import/export
fit into the equation?
> I don't understand what you mean by your question.
There is an extension that transforms Write documents to one of the
digital Braille formats, without
On 05/12/16 18:18, GwenDragon wrote:
>> If I haven't posted anything on either Bugs.documentfoundation.org, or
> Anything new for this issue?
This is why I'm writing that font analysis addition.
Learning C++ isn't as simple as I expected.
jonathon
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2011 04:18 PM, David Nelson wrote:
suggested to her to take team leadership of the LibreOffice docs teamI
two times in the past. But she's very much occupied with odfauthors.
Need I point out that Jean has been running OOoAuthors for the
On 02/11/2015 16:38, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> 1. Do you commit yourself to have enough time and the necessary
> technological tools in order to participate to the regularly scheduled
> board calls?
Can you be more specific with what you mean by "necessary technological
tools"?
By way of
On 5/26/20 1:51 PM, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
>
>
> On 26/05/2020 15:43, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
>> Paolo Vecchi wrote:
>>> 6 As individual users would you like to make a donation to TDF
>>> specifically to support the development of LibreOffice Online?
>>>
>> We can't do that.
> Is that a technical
On 5/22/20 8:05 PM, Andras Timar wrote:
> I disagree. It's a myth. Yes, it can be hard, when firewalls, load
> balancers, 5 users etc. are involved. It's the case when one needs
> professional support. But for the hobbyist, how hard is it to install
> CODE with a few clicks in Univention, or
On 2020/07/15 17:47, Kev M wrote:
>Your branding expert is possibly correct in their assessment that Personal is
>better. But alarms are going off in the heads of me and other FOSS
>supporters/ideologues on the implications of the term. Hard to balance
>interests.
The hardest part of
On 2020/07/16 10:04, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> I think TDF marketing should provide guidance on how running a successful
> major
> LibreOffice deployment without external support is set up, and what benefits
> this yields.
Back in the days of OOo 1.x, there was a document describing how to
On 2020/07/13 12:36, Michael Meeks wrote:
> I think I've detected the location of the bug already.
>
>> and that AOo and LibO are slowly migrating towards
>> mutual incompatibility.
>
> I expect that this is a matter of keeping up with standards. It takes
> significant investment to
On 2020/07/12 22:59, Tuomas Hietala wrote:
> The big issue I'd like to bring up is that the assumptions behind the
> marketing plan and Michael's analysis seem to be somewhat anglo/eurocentric,
> or perhaps more accurately global north / major language centric".
That is because historically:
On 2020/07/13 14:20, Telesto wrote:
>The potential customer has to figure out who to contact themselves. Sending
>customers more or less in the dark.
I'll grant that the LibO webpage on obtaining professional, paid
support, could be clearer. From my perspective, the biggest change to
that page
On 2020/07/14 10:41, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On 12/07/2020 20:32, toki wrote:
>> On 2020/07/08 12:40, Michael Meeks wrote:
>>> I think Thorsten stated more cleanly as:
>>>
>>> "The market for desktop libreoffice is tough;
>>> sales cy
On 2020/07/08 12:40, Michael Meeks wrote:
> One clarification since it caused some private questions:
>
> On 07/07/2020 21:13, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> Collabora - despite C'bra still putting a lot of work into
>> LibreOffice Desktop, having an outstanding support capability, doing
>> lots of
On 2020/07/10 12:59, Kev M wrote:
> Why not call it LibreOffice Vanilla?
I might be hypersensative right now, due to the riots in the United
States, but I suspect every HR department seeking to reduce "hostile
work environment" lawsuits would flat out bar the use of any product
that contained
On 2020/07/09 16:56, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:47 PM Andreas Mantke wrote:
>
>>
>> please read through the whole discussion and you may get an impression
>> that there are some intent to use TDF for such a promotion.
>>
>
> However, those with that impression are entirely
On 2020/07/08 11:08, gerry wrote:
> There is no such thing as a homogenous "enterprise" that leads to a certain
> level of software support services needs or that is per se 'suitable' for
> purchased licenses. If the marketing plan is based on wrong assumptions, then
> it might be
On 2020/07/09 16:54, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> On 7/9/20 6:35 PM, Aravind Palla wrote:
>
>> - that there will be no change of license;
>
> Based on what you assume there can be a change of license, the marketing
> plan says exactly the opposite, i.e. we do stay loyal to the copyleft
> license,
On 2020/07/25 07:58, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> for those who complains about LibreOffice campains stating free (like
> free beer), here is a current example from the official LibreOffice account:
>
> https://twitter.com/libreoffice/status/128692953570496/photo/1
Both "No Registration" and "No
On 2020/07/17 16:22, Mark Hung wrote:
> My impression as a user regarding LibreOffice Personal ( or Individuals,
> Individuals WFH, students ) vs LibreOffice Enterprises is that they might
> be different in their features, where LibreOffice Enterprise might have a
> bunch of features that suits
On 2020/07/16 10:04, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> I think TDF marketing should provide guidance on how running a successful
> major
> LibreOffice deployment without external support is set up, and what benefits
> this yields.
Back in the days of OOo 1.x, there was a document describing how to
On 26/02/2022 08:10, Lothar K. Becker wrote:
Please take also into account as there was mentioned if someone else like from
China want to engage for the sake of TDF would be hindered to contribute by
If I can make a recommendation, create a list of specific criteria that
will result in
On 07/25/2013 10:06 PM, theUser BL wrote:
The big question is: Why doing LibreOffice that?
The short answer is that the licenses that each organization uses allows
that to happen.
The longer answer is that free qua libre has implications that free qua
open does not have. Implications that the
58 matches
Mail list logo
